Hi Guys. I brought up the subject of Planet X's orbiting moons/planets in the last post, as My suspicions were confirmed that I am indeed noticing
something else other than the original object at two o'clock.
Over the last few days I have been looking over My old images from throughout the year (hundreds) and I have noticed some reoccurring patterns
regarding these objects that I thought I may have been seeing more recently. I have also acquired an eye for this different opaque red orb with
'wings' form recently, and this has now appeared in old images in addition to the primary object of interest. I Want to go into why I think it has
taken this form in a moment.
I feel Confident and certain enough to
Actually say there are undoubtably more objects. These objects have remained consistent in their positions for the most part of the duration, but I
dismissed them previously as my focus was on the main object at two o'clock. I have included a drawing (below) that I made, depicting where the extra
objects are in relation to each other and the sun. I attempted to make it to scale as well as I could. If anyone is interested in taking note of this
pattern? This link has many images for reference:poleshift.ning.com...
One object in particular, in the just shy of 11 o'clock position, I believe may be light blue. This conclusion was also reached through seeing
multiple videos and images with the object in the same place in the N. Hemisphere. The blue 11 o'clock object, in retrospect, was the first object I
ever captured before My campaign this year. At the time it was a small orb next to the sun, but I didn't take it any further and dismissed it. I also
noticed it was blue without the filter. BTW I now know this object has remained in that position since 2014.
I have included a link here (relevant info near the bottom of the page) www.zetatalk.com...
from a Zetatalk Q&A regarding a red
orb sighting in South Africa. This object was determined by ZT to actually be a 'monster persona' of Venus. I have also included a link
on light refraction and the reason for the appearance and size of these personas. This principle I can
now say, is relevant to certain characteristics I am seeing from numerous objects.
Even more curiously I was reviewing yesterday's images from the Giglio Campese webcam here:
and I could also make out faint winged orbs, very reminiscent of what I have been seeing in My own images. Furthermore I also spotted a winged orb in
the South Africa photo; both of these images I will include alongside previously documented images of the winged object from earlier in the
My theory is now, that as these extra planets and moons I have noticed must also be in the locale of the Brown Dwarf's debris field and this has also
given them the appearance of having 'wings'. As I also hope you'll understand, the seeming increased size of the opaque objects at times is due to a
light refraction of sorts; clouds also play a crucial role at enhancing the object's form/s I have found, just the other day it was overcast and I
could make out a very faint 'projection' of the object's form through the clouds, just visible to the human eye if you knew what and where to look for
them, the camera is also working wonders at enhancing further the appearance of these objects.
I just want to also mention that when I first set out in search of seeing Planet X, I expected to see a round sun like object, as I explained in the
link to my previous thread in the OP. I can also say now, that I know the actual size of the solid version/form of the core object, is not many times
greater than a typical star; but still bigger than anything in the night sky, bar the moon of coarse. So many of the actual 'second sun' sightings
around the world, have actually been refracted enlarged projections of the true size of the objects they were portraying at the time.
The sizes and forms/personas can vary due to many factors:
•The object's movement and position in space.
•The object's position in relation to the debris cloud in space as this also filters light.
•Atmospheric conditions on Earth;rain, cloud/Chem trails etc. ~On clear days and also during the height of the day (with no cloud) it is actually
more tricky to spot the object, until right at the last 45 minutes of the day. For the most part it will appear as an orb if seen then, but generally
smaller than at other times of the day, this orb can appear whitey yellow at times, but usually the core is picked up as a pinky red dot by the
•At times the orbiting objects around the core may actually appear bigger than the core itself;even though they technically are probably not? I
assume this? I know the mass of the core would be greater than the orbitals, but it may not necessarily mean it is larger in size,I'll assume it
Likely to be larger though. This additional factor relating to size perspective as seen from Earth,is due to the orbiting moons/planets actually being
placed out ahead of the core object (at times) as they are gravitationally bound to the mini solar system traveling through space.
•The seasonal tilt of Our planet plays a role in size perspective as well I can imagine. Add to this the "wobble" that the Earth has gained due to
PX's gravitational effects and this also contributes to what size the object is perceived during sightings.
•Lastly, for many years the object was seen more clearly from the Southern Hemisphere as it travelled from below the ecliptic. This at the time
would no doubt have also been a factor as to why it appeared bigger in images compared to other locations. BUT, now we have more clear sightings in
the Northern Hemisphere, so it is clearly gaining on Us.
I can imagine at times this thread may have challenged what is commonly thought and peoples expectations etc, but this is new territory! so expect to
see and hear more stuff that will continue to test your perceptions.
Going back to the 'monster persona' aspect of Venus, as brought up before. This was also due to it's increased proximity due to "Earth's halted
orbit". I admit I initially found this ZT claim to be hard on my preconceived beliefs. BTW I have never seen the ZT proof (SOHO images) of halted
orbit debunked anywhere. Here's a simple point a friend brought up the other day. How come the object/s by the sun (which I am clearly capturing no
questions) have and do, consistently remain viewable ALL year round?! Shouldn't we see it disappear behind the sun at times each year if Earth was in
it's traditional orbit?! I can also attest It is viewable all year long and has been in consistent position for near on two years. So logically the ZT
halted orbit is proven by this fact.
edit on 8-10-2015 by EndOfDays77 because: (no reason given)
edit on 8-10-2015 by EndOfDays77 because: (no reason