It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Astyanax
a reply to: Phantom423
We have to accept that in this universe at least, there are no absolutes.
Accepted. Now tell me again, what is the proposition we are supposed to be debating (or discussing, if you prefer)?
Scientific investigation is conducted when a question has some evidence one way or another that can be tested and analyzed. A divine entity has no such evidence.
That sounds like a shortcoming of the scientific method, not an advantage.
Besides, I put it to you (as I did before, though you may have missed it) that the Paleyan argument for Creation is actually a very powerful one, and despite the advent of Darwin and the massive advances evolutionary science has made since the latter's day, it has not yet been refuted.
originally posted by: Blue_Jay33
Nope, the huge amounts of energy being transformed into matter and then expanding into the void of nothing billions of years ago to start our universe off looks like a "big bang",
I have no issue with the science behind that. After all this time of back and forth, and you STILL don't know what I believe, a shame really.
I leave where all that energy came from, for another thread.
That's what I do like about you Barcs you always give me idea's for new threads.
originally posted by: Phantom423
originally posted by: SuperFrog
Is it me or number of people believing in creationist claims on ATS has dropped?!
I remember live discussions here on ATS in regards to creation myth, but now whole forum is kind of dead with overwhelming evidence being found on daily bases that points to evolution.
Interesting time we live in...
It's the disappearing act that always happens when the rational side posts overwhelming evidence that they can't match. The pro science posters continually add to the quality and quantity of evidence. The Creationists may have run their course. In that case, I guess we won
We didn't change any minds. We just pushed them into hiding until such time as they think they can come out and start all over again. By that time, I hope that the library is relatively complete so the pro side can use the links.
In any case, we'll be here when they think the coast is clear and they come out of hiding!
originally posted by: Astyanax
You guys keep acting like evolution is a personal preference choice like blue vs red. It's not.
Why not, exactly?
Either you agree that science teaches us things about the earth and universe or you don't.
What if you don't?
originally posted by: PhotonEffect
a reply to: Phantom423
I think the child abuse moniker is a bit much, but that's just me.
Are there universities that teach creationism?
For instance meditation is also just a tool. It is just a matter of preference with which we choose to progress through life and try to get some understanding or whatever you desire with the tools we like the most.
But in case of meditation. This tool is the only one available to work on your inner world. Well there are psychedelic drugs, but I would not recommend using them to learn about spirituality, but are great just for curiosity and for fun. But other than that we have no other tools available to work with or I am not aware them.
originally posted by: UniFinity
a reply to: TzarChasm
I am not comparing, just putting out a prospective that everything can be consider as a tool. Science, meditation, spirituality, archaeology, biology, physics, etc...
And a good scientist would do as you say, but there is more. A good scientist would take any opinion into account weather it is outside his beliefs or comfort zone and work with all the tools at his disposal. They are not biased.