It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

9/11 Trillions: Follow The Money

page: 1
50
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+23 more 
posted on Sep, 15 2015 @ 02:29 PM
link   
In the last few days there have been a handful of 9/11 videos presented here on ATS (good thing). Most were in the 1 hour range and I watched them all. I know it is a lot to ask for someone to sit through a video that long and may never happen if they are back to back, so I waited til today to post what I found to be a very strong presentation. The AE911 video was pretty much the same ol thing, Christopher Bollyn added some new depth to Israel possible involvement and Rebekah Roth's was interesting, but not really convincing.

So here I present the Corbett Report's "9/11 Trillions: Follow The Money" if you don't know James he has been following and 9/11 since the beginning and most likely started The Corbett Report because of 9/11. This video names names and delves into the untouched areas the Media never bothered to investigate. From the 9/11 Commission to the Bush Administration, to Insider Trading, etc. James has it covered.

I truly recommend it.





posted on Sep, 15 2015 @ 02:53 PM
link   
a reply to: ugmold

I do think there were a number of individuals/organizations that had foreknowledge of the attacks and were able to profit off of it. Snopes did say that the 9/11 Commission researched this premise and determined that insider trading did NOT occur Snopes

So according to Snopes, the insider trading claim is false BUT this is based on the findings of the 9/11 Commission, which in and of itself doesn't sit well with me.

Conflicts of interest, inaccurate data submitted to the Commission by the FAA and NORAD, among other sketchy factors have lead me to conclude that the 9/11 Commission was ineffective (or effective, depending on how you look at it).

Just goes to show that you should also take Snopes' conclusions with a grain of salt. In this case, I think Snopes is wrong entirely. Insider trading likely DID occur.

I bet someone who works for SEC or NSA could do some digging and find out if there really is hard evidence of insider trading. Unfortunately I haven't heard of any.
edit on 15-9-2015 by FamCore because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 15 2015 @ 03:43 PM
link   
Pretty simple. This should be an open and shut case. If only the investigators would just FOLLOW THE MONEY!



posted on Sep, 15 2015 @ 04:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: FamCore

So according to Snopes, the insider trading claim is false BUT this is based on the findings of the 9/11 Commission, which in and of itself doesn't sit well with me.


I bet someone who works for SEC or NSA could do some digging and find out if there really is hard evidence of insider trading. Unfortunately I haven't heard of any.

Trouble is, would the NSA want to? To me, "Tarred with the same brush" comes to mind. This whole thing is a big circle of who knows who, and even the Military and FAA R&D could be considered compromised before 9/11, never mind the R&D of intranet type monetary systems being compromised..(if that was a third party of course?)
For the OP thanks for the video, some I knew about, other stuff I didn't. Christopher Bollyn did add to the story quite a bit, I guess he is not a born orator, but still, he got there too.


Just to add, I think it's time G.W. and George Tenet ended their pact and started splitting on one another...that would be something.
edit on 15-9-2015 by smurfy because: Text.



posted on Sep, 15 2015 @ 04:13 PM
link   
a reply to: ugmold

Didnt see it but lemme guess:

Israel and Murica!!!




posted on Sep, 15 2015 @ 08:32 PM
link   
a reply to: combatmaster

I wish I could make sense of everything as easily as you do.



posted on Sep, 16 2015 @ 04:22 AM
link   
a reply to: FamCore

General question - I often see people quote Snopes as a legitimate source with no agendas but it makes me wonder who runs Snopes and how do we know that they are legit 100% of the time?



posted on Sep, 16 2015 @ 04:42 AM
link   
a reply to: ugmold

So many agencies has a hand in 9/11 both US and Israeli

No wonder it leaked out

Google "dancing Israelis"



posted on Sep, 16 2015 @ 06:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: ragsntatters
a reply to: FamCore

General question - I often see people quote Snopes as a legitimate source with no agendas but it makes me wonder who runs Snopes and how do we know that they are legit 100% of the time?


That was exactly my reasoning behind explaining the BS behind the 9/11 Commission Report and how Snopes automatically labeled the insider trading claim as "false", based on the 9/11 Commission Report (which ITSELF is questionable, therefore making Snopes evaluation more than questionable, when they point the the Report and say it's true and reliable)

I will be looking into any Snopes claims much more closely now.



posted on Sep, 16 2015 @ 07:43 AM
link   
Soooo now the SEC and Snopes are in on it too?

Silverstein's insurance company fought the double claim but didn't consider investigating the 'pull it' claims?
If Silverstein ordered the building demo'ed, why should they pay out?

And no one has talked in 14 years?
The president can't get a BJ in secret.
The head of the CIA can't have an affair in secret.
A US general can't get a little on the side in secret.
But trillions of dollars can change hands and go missing and no one talks?
Not one ex wife or widow feels they were short changed?
Not one peon in the plan feels they didn't get their fair share?

Russia and China can steal our military secrets.
Russia and China can steal personal data from our computers.
Russia and China can turn our citizens into spys against us.
But not one conspiracy peep out of them.



posted on Sep, 16 2015 @ 08:54 AM
link   
Bravo yet again James Corbett! Nice condensation of the financial crimes aspect of 9/11. Note that he doesn't even wander in to hearsay stories about trucks removing gold bullion from the WTC during the attacks, he only sticks to the facts which there are a multitude of.

Not mentioned however was Project Hammer, a plan from the GHWBush administration to destroy the ruble and crash the Soviet economy which they did with the help of Soros. The plan was funded by bonds in the amount of $310 billion which were due to mature (coincidentally!) on 9/11 and were to be processed by the brokerage of Marsh and McClennan whose offices were "coincidentally" hit by the AA flight 11. The only time in history normal rules were suspended immediately after the attacks and the Federal Reserve automatically cleared such bonds without the usual checking system which would have shown them fraudulent.

The take down of WTC 7 conveniently destroyed all the evidence against corporate fraud committed by Enron and WorldCom along with many other financial crimes of smaller scope than hundreds of billions.

9/11 was such a brazen attack on the American people and system of government smugly concealed by those who at least benefitted greatly from it if they weren't indeed in on the planning and execution as well.
Forget partisanship here, it was not the work of just the Neocons there were Democrats a plenty tied in with these crimes as well.

Yet here were are probably $10 Trillion unaccounted from the Pentagon alone while our National debt looms at a staggering sum of double that, close to $20 Trillion. They foisted the axe of financial doom over our heads threatening to crash the economy in 2008 as a pretext for the great TARP bankster giveaway of a couple more cool Trillion.

What I find most ironic is the role of 2 men: one named Yassin Al-Qadi fellow who had deep ties to PTECH and the other named Oussama Ziadi. Knowing what PTECH's role and reach were (basically knowing EVERY weakness in nearly every major government department including the FAA, White House and DOD) how on Earth was our government willing to allow such a company unlimited insider access to government computer networks?

Is it just "coincidence" that Osama Bin Laden and Al Qaeda sound an awful lot like Oussama Ziadi and Yassin Al Qadi? Who had these deep connections to the Saudis? How about the Bush family and the CIA who basically set them up as Royalty to rule over a desert that happened to contain lots of oil?

9/11 launched the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq leading to todays crisis situation in the Middle East as well as launching the war on civil liberties and freedoms at home. The American people not only allowed it but cheered thinking in their fearful state that the government was going to protect them from the bad guys. What it did was allow the bad guys to hijack our entire system of government and run it for personal profit and power.

The few thousand lives lost in the attack themselves are but a drop in the bucket of hte true damage done to America and to the world using the pretext of 9/11.

There are at a minimum several hundred people that should hang for treason against their own country.



posted on Sep, 16 2015 @ 09:29 AM
link   
a reply to: ugmold

been some good movies coming out - while they might not prove anything they definitely warrant another state sponsored investigation.

I've always wondered though, why do people think there needs to be such a large number of people involved.....

the only two planes that were involved in that day did hit the buildings... beacons were placed at the precise floors where they impacted and just guided the empty planes in... 2 guys could walk in posing as janitors or printer technicians drop the suitcase sized beacon and walk out!

you'd need 10 further people (5 per building) to enter every night and coat sections of every floor in a chemical compound that dissolves cement - the sections that are load bearing for the floors!

it might take a month.. maybe more - but when you own the security of the building you can get them in anytime you need

of course career brass types at the military would be involved, who else can snatch 2 Boeing's from the boneyard, paint them up and supply the homing beacons. but those guys aren't going to talk are they!

you'd have a fighter pilot drop a bomb in shanksville and shoot a missile at the pentagon then return to Andrews..

the key.. would be Rupert Murdoch!

you needed him to allow the officials, advisers and such on tv spouting the cover story.. over and over and over and making it look as official as F**k!!!

the theory that a few guys with box cutters over whelmed an entire airline without a struggle is the elite giving you the sumbolic finger in the history books

of course.. what involved a lot of people was the aftermath!

fake narrative for War
War and occupation
Insurgency
Saddam's execution
Zarqawi and IEDS
Lebanon
Libya and Qaddafi
Egypt
Syria
ISIS
public be-headings and mass murdering armies across the middle east...

having all snowballed from 9/11
edit on am931308162015-09-16T09:31:26-05:00092015p by Agit8dChop because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 16 2015 @ 09:55 AM
link   
a reply to: Agit8dChop

The cement was non structural in wtc. There was a great deal of painting/fireproofing going on at night leading up to the date. Thermite can be easily added to paint or fireproofing, without any workers being aware.

Im not convinced this is what happened, but it fills a few gaps in your theory.

Also bld 7 contained one of the facilities for the remote operation of the planes. Since the iran hostage crisis, all commercial airliners are to be able to be flown remotely. Very few of the smaller planes meet this requirement yet, but most of the newer and larger airliners do. I read that all 767s and 777s are equipped with this.

Im not an aviation guy, maybe someone else can clarify, it did seem very well sourced when i read it.



posted on Sep, 16 2015 @ 02:45 PM
link   
a reply to: Asktheanimals




Yet here were are probably $10 Trillion unaccounted from the Pentagon alone while our National debt looms at a staggering sum of double that, close to $20 Trillion.

You don't know what you are talking about.
You need to look up a few things before you spout gibberish.

From 1970 to 2001 the entire defense budget was less than 7 trillion dollars. (6.96 trillion)
So you are claiming that the DOD couldn't account for any of the money it received from about 1950 to 2001?
Bull cookies.

It sounds like you make up your own information.



posted on Sep, 16 2015 @ 07:03 PM
link   
I remember very clearly there were someone/group, or organization that shorted the airline stock, but we never heard much about it afterward.

It was a very large some of money, because at the time I was heavily into trading stocks. Only someone with foreknowledge would have shorted an airline stock then.



posted on Sep, 16 2015 @ 07:19 PM
link   
There is nothing in the video that even remotely suggest a false flag operation.

Remember, the government has been wasting billions for decades even before 9/11. I can still remember that $250.00, 2-inch long aluminum extrusion that was part of a C-5 seat modification kit and it wasn't even drilled. That same piece would go for less than 75 cents at the local hardware store.



posted on Sep, 16 2015 @ 07:50 PM
link   
a reply to: Realtruth




It was a very large some of money, because at the time I was heavily into trading stocks. Only someone with foreknowledge would have shorted an airline stock then.

Not true!
Pick almost any airline stock.
They have cycles tied to 'Mom'.
Meaning they tend to peak between thanksgiving and xmas.
But they also take a dip at the beginning of September.
Plus back then none of the airlines were making money on a consistent basis.
There were downgrades left and right.

To be specific about 911, a downgrade was traced to a stock news letter to subscribers.
Thus the higher number of shorts that day.
These new letters still go out and people still trade on them.
Nothing sinister. Nothing illegal.



posted on Sep, 16 2015 @ 10:20 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409

And so this leads you to believe Trillions of dollars cannot disappear and be "stolen" because other sectors of government and corporations are stealing everything first ?

Remember, one who thinks the towers "collapsed" is clearly a mortal enemy of reality.



posted on Sep, 16 2015 @ 10:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: samkent
Soooo now the SEC and Snopes are in on it too?

Silverstein's insurance company fought the double claim but didn't consider investigating the 'pull it' claims?
If Silverstein ordered the building demo'ed, why should they pay out?

And no one has talked in 14 years?
The president can't get a BJ in secret.
The head of the CIA can't have an affair in secret.
A US general can't get a little on the side in secret.
But trillions of dollars can change hands and go missing and no one talks?
Not one ex wife or widow feels they were short changed?
Not one peon in the plan feels they didn't get their fair share?


That's because they focus on irrelevant issues to draw your attention away from the big picture. It seems they're doing a good job.
edit on 16-9-2015 by v1rtu0s0 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 16 2015 @ 11:37 PM
link   
a reply to: ParasuvO



And so this leads you to believe Trillions of dollars cannot disappear and be "stolen" because other sectors of government and corporations are stealing everything first ?


Not in this case. I knew the Pentagon's system was outdated and could not handle the that much money at one time.

During the 9/11 attack, I was supervisor/inspector for a team of specialist working on an Air Force contract as employees of a major defense contractor at Travis AFB, CA., and it was my job to order parts, equipment and other support items for my team.

I might add that most of the $2.3 trillion in question has now been accounted for. The money was never stolen as truthers would lead us to believe.

edit on 16-9-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)




top topics



 
50
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join