Topless Women Activist disrupt Muslim conference in France (One female kicked)

I find it ,in a word, vulgar.
I understand why they did it and I would imagine getting beaten was just sauce for the goose to them.
I just have differing views on activists in general and their end games.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Different stroke for Different Goats.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

I protest like this

YouTube link

a reply to: CallYourBluff

Treating women as lesser people is in every religion, even yours.
Did you notice it wasn't the speakers but some people from the crowd that did the kicking?

And how is showing that this happens regardless of religion not relevant?

a reply to: TechniXcality

Do you usually get rear naked choked by a naked guy?

originally posted by: JohnthePhilistine
a reply to: enlightenedservant Hey Mods, will I be the one banned for pointing out that this member is an obvious shill?

LOL Please point out whatever your delusions are showing you. ATS is pretty entertaining to me, but a lot of the doom porn & conspiracy theories have sucked lately. So maybe you can enlighten us on my supposed shill properties? (Though I'm pretty sure calling people shills is against the rules here, but whatever).

EDIT to stay on topic:

I stand by my posts in this thread. As most of you know, I'm an actual Muslim. And I'm also pretty devoted to equality. I support true women's civil rights, which deal with equal treatment, protections, benefits, rights, privileges, and responsibilities. I even accept that there are other women's issues that men simply won't understand, so I'd prefer that women be able to speak openly on them (as in, I have no clue about what it's like to be pregnant, to go through menstruation, etc).

But that doesn't change the fact that abuse of women is a global problem. I even showed 2 other Femen protesters getting slammed down & detained from 2 years ago. I also showed a clip of Trump implying there would be fighting if the 2 women BLM protesters interrupted him. I mentioned facts which go against the general direction of this thread, so that makes me a "shill"?

originally posted by: infolurker
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Another link here:
www.liveleak.com...


Anyone know what the Goat on the big screen (31 seconds) was for? Cannot read the writing.

is it a goat?

or a calf?

one of the comments,
"suicide boobers."

originally posted by: CallYourBluff

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: CallYourBluff
Guarantee you wouldn't see that kind of a beating at my local christian church(maybe in the time of the Crusades). Islam, the religion of peace.

There are plenty of so called Christian bullies.

Many women suffer abuse because a priest/minister tells them its their fault if they don't keep their man happy.

There are bullies in every religion, but nothing quite like Islam.Muslims believe it's there duty to inflict violence on non believers and blasphemers.
Dawkins on apostasy.Even the moderate Muslim representative tries his hardest not tell the truth.
www.youtube.com...

You're so funny. You're having difficulty separating so called Muslims from the Quran. Anybody can call themselves a Muslim and act like a douchebag or a psycho.
There is no death sentence for blasphemers, apostates or homosexuals in the Quran. The Quran encourages the freedom of religion and strongly condemns oppression of any sort. Dressing up like a Middle Easterner, growing a beard or wearing a burqa doesn't make you more righteous, pious or religious. Again, there is no such dress codes in the Quran either. Dressing up religiously or calling yourself a Muslim doesn't give you the right to treat people like crap or look down at others. I disagree with what those women did but kicking them was very wrong.

You want to know the real Islam? Read the Quran. Muslims or hadith books don't represent Islam, the Quran does.

a reply to: enlightenedservant

I think they probably would have been thrown off the stage shirt or no shirt.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

If they have a valid cause and legitimate grievance, it would be nice to have those issues up front and center, as opposed to seeing two wildly irrational topless chicks acting like animals. It doesn't set a very good precedence for their cause....at least from my vantage point. You have to understand, as a woman...it's just childish histrionic behavior.

But hey, whatever gets your rocks off....right?

a reply to: GENERAL EYES

it would be nice to have those issues up front and center, as opposed to seeing two wildly irrational topless chicks acting like animals.

Gibberish.

originally posted by: Gin
The two imams were addressing in their lecture the issue of wether men are allowed to beat their wives or not, according to Islam’s teachings. Well this encounter proved that point on which side they fall toward, by needing 20 men and kicks to subdue 2 female protesters.

and what was the conclusion?

originally posted by: GENERAL EYES
If they have a valid cause and legitimate grievance, it would be nice to have those issues up front and center...

The issue was up front and center, it was the two Bronze Age morons who were giving a lecture on whether it is okay to slap your wife around or not.

Those guys are the ones who should have been kicked in the head, not the protester.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

But we don't get to see how the debate they were engaging in manifested....nope...instead all the coverage is on the topless chicks. Completely diverting attention away from the original assembly. Tell me then, what was the final summation of their discussion? Does anyone know? Of course not.

Girl....interrupted.

originally posted by: Stormdancer777
a reply to: enlightenedservant

I think they probably would have been thrown off the stage shirt or no shirt.

I actually agree. Security guards of all kinds can get very physical if they perceive a threat. Do you remember the "don't tase me bro!" videos? Or the guy who foolishly threw the shoes at Bush?

EDIT: Before someone tries to take this post out of context. I'm saying I agree that they probably would've been thrown off the stage either way, NOT that I agree that they should've been thrown off the stage. I even stated in an earlier post in this very thread that I'm against violence against women & believe that trained security guards should be able to safely escort them off the stage & into custody. But some people may have bad reading comprehension & will jump to the obviously wrong conclusion.

originally posted by: GENERAL EYES
But we don't get to see how the debate they were engaging in manifested....nope...instead all the coverage is on the topless chicks. Completely diverting attention away from the original assembly. Tell me then, what was the final summation of their discussion? Does anyone know? Of course not.

Girl....interrupted.

That was not the point. I was not aware that there was even a debate about whether it is okay to beat your wife or not (it is not). Now I am aware. Mission accomplished.

a reply to: enlightenedservant

Tasers are for taser-ing. Feet are for walking, not kicking women.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Fair enough.

I suppose in the end, despite the means...raising awareness is important.

Flipping tables in the temple and all that.

So it goes.

originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: CallYourBluff

There is people of every race and religion beating women everyday.

People are just assholes period.

Even in your church.

I don't attend a church and I'm not religious.