It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

9/11 Bombshell: Methodical Deception -- Rebekah Roth

page: 50
135
<< 47  48  49   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Oct, 6 2015 @ 10:18 AM
link   

originally posted by: PublicOpinion
a reply to: Boone 870

What makes you think the "Freedom Files" are the original tapes?


Digitized and remastered by Dictaphone, how in hell is that supposed to be first-hand evidence? Wouldn't be sufficient in any decent lawsuit either.

Now you're just being silly.

Of course they're not the "original tapes." Unless you have the actual reels that were recorded on on September 11, 2001 from NEADS, you are listening to a digitized version, or copies, of the originals.

This is how your conspiracy theory has progressed so far:

You inferred that some anonymous person from NEADS called the SOF at Langley and ordered him to go flying in order to sabotage the F-16s' heading after departure.

I provided evidence that proves even if the F-16s had headed directly towards Washington upon departure, they did not have time to reach the Pentagon before American 77 impacted, and they would not of been anywhere near Washington DC anyway because they were headed to Baltimore.

You chose to ignore that and continued on arguing that it was sabotage because we didn't have recordings of who ordered the SOF to go flying.

I found the recording that proves it was major Anderson from NEADS and not some anonymous conspirator who made the phone call, and that it was Capt. Borgstrom himself who made the decision to go flying.

You responded by questioning the authenticity of the recordings because you don't have access to the actual reels from NEADS thereby not only implicating NEADS in the conspiracy, but also Dictaphone because the recordings debunked your theory.

If this is all you have, you have nothing at all.

I asked you a few posts back if you learned anything from this discussion. The answer is a resounding NO!






edit on 6-10-2015 by Boone 870 because: (no reason given)




posted on Oct, 6 2015 @ 10:54 AM
link   
a reply to: Boone 870




you have nothing at all.


Except that I had to correct your false claims.

First you said Langley made the decision to scramble straight to the training-area, which was incorrect at best. Secondly you claimed there wouldn't have been enough time to intercept and of course you didn't care about FAA-accounts or Nasypanys orders. And finally you didn't even realize the difference between first and second hand evidence with regards to digitized tapes. Yeah, trust the military if ya like. I won't.

How can I possibly learn something when I have to straighten up the facts all the time? Whatever. Let's stop derailing this topic for a while and focus on the op instead, this is fruitless.


edit on 6-10-2015 by PublicOpinion because: (no reason given)



posted on Oct, 6 2015 @ 01:31 PM
link   

originally posted by: PublicOpinion

First you said Langley made the decision to scramble straight to the training-area, which was incorrect at best.

False. I never said Langley sent them to W-386. I said Langley ignored the scramble order and entered 090° for 60 miles into the system. This, of course, sent them toward W-386 and that is where they eventually ended up. That happened only because Langley didn't inform anyone else that it was them who had changed the direction they were sending the fighters. Langley Tower had zero control of the F-16s once they were handed off to Norfolk TRACON. Langley Tower no longer has control of any aircraft once they are five miles from the airport, that is no longer their airspace.

As I said earlier, NEADS, GIANTKILLER and Langley Tower all agree with this. You are the one calling them all liars to perpetuate your silly conspiracy.


Secondly you claimed there wouldn't have been enough time to intercept and of course you didn't care about FAA-accounts or Nasypanys orders.
I'm not sure which FAA account and which orders of Nasypany's that I'm ignoring, but they are completely irrelevant to the speed that the aircraft could've traveled to the Pentagon.

I provided a link to two separate documents which contain the maximum possible obtainable speed for the F-16s in the configuration they were in on 9/11. The time It would've taken for them to cover that distance at the speed they could've traveled Is indisputable. Unless you want to dismiss the two documents I linked about speed because they're not "first-hand accounts."



and finally you didn't even realize the difference between first and second hand evidence with regards to digitized tapes.
Once again, you're blaming Dictaphone and NEADS with zero evidence. You have nothing but conspiratorial fantasies.




Let's stop derailing this topic for a while and focus on the op instead, this is fruitless.

Fruitless is the perfect definition of the 9/11 truth movement. 14 years on and zero accomplishments.



posted on Mar, 9 2016 @ 08:21 AM
link   

originally posted by: jude11
Let's start out by saying...I don't know. But it's info I haven't ever heard before now. Quite a few dots connected that are shocking but then again, the entire subject is just that.



What I do know is that we have never been told the truth behind 9/11.

I know that we have a right to know.

I know that if everything checked out to be as the OS states, there would be no questions.

I also know that what the OS states is NOT what actually happened.

I know that if the Govt. wanted to put this all to rest because what they say is the truth, they would be forthcoming with ALL info. Nothing to hide? Nothing to worry about. Sound familiar?

So if this video is yet another piece of crap with no substance we can dismiss it. But there are those here that know a hell of a lot more than myself and I will appreciate their input.

Here is the full interview.

From the YT source:

Source

In this interview Rebekah drops some bombshells that prove not only that 9/11 was a false flag event long in the planning, but that the operation leads directly back to companies and intelligence assets deeply rooted in and connected to the state of Israel.

In fact, some of the information shared in this remarkable interview is so critical for every American to understand that if you don't want to listen to the full interview, at least make sure you fast forward to the 31:20 mark.

Because as Rebekah says, "This is the elephant in the room that nobody wanted to talk about." The pictures you will see and the information you will hear may well shock you to your core. Share it with your friends and family.

Every single American citizen should know the truth about what happened on 9/11 and the months leading up to it - and who the REAL culprits were.


Just passing it along and asking for answers from those that know more than myself. If you believe that coming on here and saying "This is a load of crap" is your hard based evidence, then back it up.

If you think you might have something to say that can change my mind, it won't work.

I don't know as fact as to what, who, how or why but I do know that we are being lied to and that's enough. I do have my own theories as to what, who, how and why but that's for another thread.

So, watch the first vid and if it intrigues you move on to the second and more detailed vid. Then, and only then will it be time to comment.

Jude






It's interesting that I have not heard of her until a couple of weeks ago, and yet my own research had led me to believe that Israel and Mossad had something to do with 9/11. But she comes to those conclusions with information I have never heard before.

Fantastic interview in the last video.



posted on May, 5 2017 @ 03:50 PM
link   
The video has no substance, it is fiction. This kind of far out fantasy about an event sells soap for the fringe news and entertainment business like Coast to Coast, you love to listen, even rational people who know it is BS.

Rebekah Roth lies about 9/11 and make up false claims.

Rebekah Roth is late to 9/11 truth, one big lie which makes her suspect - she claims there were automatic systems to take control of the jets. There were not automatic systems to take control of 11, 175, 77 and 93. She claims the flight failed to follow hijack procedures, and she has no clue the pilots and some crew were murdered as the planes were take. The pilots on 93 had just received a message warning of cockpit instructions when they were attacked and you can hear them screaming on ATC freq. It is sad to see so much fiction for an event where 19 failed humans for UBL murdered thousands on 9/11. Why does she lie about 9/11, is it money... she sells fictional books on 9/11, offers zero evidence, no proof for her claims.



posted on May, 6 2017 @ 10:09 AM
link   
a reply to: beachnut

You make some good points, but no matter what Rebecca Roth writes, the preponderance of the facts and evidence work against the official story.

Maybe she is just trying to make a few dollars through book sales, but it doesn't really matter. With or without Roth, the official story fails at every turn.



posted on May, 6 2017 @ 01:44 PM
link   
a reply to: Salander

Personally, I agree with much of Roth's input. She's also not afraid to implicate Mossad and all the Israeli ties that are simply undeniable.

What's considered the popular "truth movement" will not even discuss the Israeli connection.



posted on May, 8 2017 @ 08:24 AM
link   
a reply to: AgarthaSeed

IMO, of all the independent journalists writing of 911, Christopher Bollyn is the best. I've read both his books. Rather ironic that he is married to an Israeli woman, but I think that gives him a special insight into the many, astounding, Israeli connections to the events of the day.

One of these days I'm going to try to get hold of The Medusa Touch, a 1978 movie with artwork depicting airliners striking the WTC.




top topics



 
135
<< 47  48  49   >>

log in

join