It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Like I said on another thread they could have bombed those buildings for hours and they would have NEVER gone down that way.
Kader building - uninsulated steel girders of poor quality building far smaller and not built to same standard, already damaged by previous fires, no sprinkler system installed (not to mention fire doors that weren't actually installed, external doors locked, fire alarm didn't work poor design & layout)
Oakland overpass - whilst all asphalt was clearly melted there was only one section of the road that collapsed and the steel did not melt as it did allegeldy in WTC.
Any typical office fire will weaken steel to the point of failure. Remember, the impacts dislodged fire protection from the steel structures of the WTC buildings.
The impact may have dislodged the fire protection in the impact hole, however it did not dislodge the protection from the rest of the WTC.
You want us to believe that fire alone did what is shone in those pics, to the iron in the images because a website and you say so? Sorry, but you can't sell me that easy.
(which all melted simutaneously).
That is moot by the fact the collapse were initiated at the impact points where the fires were centered and nowhere else.
According to scientific investigation, fire, in conjunction with impact damages, was responsible for the collapse of the WTC buildings.
We know that demo explosives were not responsible because there are no sounds of demo explosions in any WTC video.