It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

9/11 Bombshell: Methodical Deception -- Rebekah Roth

page: 14
135
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 05:03 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958

FBI file on ATT Operator who received a call asking to be connected to (202) 514-2201 (Ted Olson's DoJ office)

www.911myths.com...

FBI files on notes on phone calls made that day, including an interview with Lori Lynn Keyton about the telephone calls she received from Barbra Olson that day. Ms. Keyton, at the time was Ted Olson's secretary.

www.911myths.com...


So, according to the FBI, Barbra Olson, DID call her husband, she just used an Airfone and not her personal cellphone.




posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 05:05 PM
link   
a reply to: PhyllidaDavenport

Your video, is full of fiction. And easily disproven fiction at that. But, please, run right out and buy her book.


edit on 13-9-2015 by cardinalfan0596 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 05:09 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958



The FBI doesn't make mistakes.


Actually, the FBI does make mistakes. Check it out.

FBI Admits Mistake



FBI Chief Acknowledges 9/11 Errors

FBI Director Robert Mueller, acknowledging serious lapses in how the FBI mishandled some information prior to Sept. 11, suggested for the first time that investigators might have detected the terrorist plot if they had pursued leads more diligently. Mueller's acknowledgment came amid two new disclosures of what could be missed hints about Sept. 11.

www.cbsnews.com...


Pre-9/11 Missteps By FBI Detailed

The inability to detect the Sept. 11, 2001, hijacking plot amounts to a "significant failure" by the FBI and was caused in large part by "widespread and longstanding deficiencies" in the way the agency handled terrorism and intelligence cases, according to a report released yesterday.

www.washingtonpost.com...


9/11 commission faults U.S. intelligence

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- U.S. intelligence gathering was fragmented and poorly coordinated before the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, the 9/11 commission reported Wednesday, adding that it remains unclear how such crucial information is managed.

The report, examining the performance of the intelligence community, described a "loose collection" of intelligence agencies that often operated independently of one another with little communication or cooperation. And it faulted CIA Director George Tenet for not having a management strategy to battle terrorism before the 9/11 attacks.

www.cnn.com...


Report Cites FBI's pre-9/11 intelligence lapses

WASHINGTON — The FBI missed at least five opportunities before the Sept. 11 attacks to uncover vital intelligence information about the terrorists, and the bureau didn’t aggressively pursue the information it did have, the Justice Department’s inspector general says in a newly released critique of government missteps.

www.nbcnews.com...


FBI admits that ALL its forensic experts exaggerated hair evidence at every criminal trial for nearly 20 years

www.dailymail.co.uk... l#ixzz3leuK4r4V


As you can see, the FBI does make mistakes, and continued to make mistakes even after 9/11.



Let me remind you this was exposed during a trail. The FBI said Barbra Olsen did not make a call to Ted Olsen that morning.


You might want to read the FBi's report on the phone calls of Barbara Olson in its interview.



FBI interview with Ted Olson about the calls he had received

...Shortly after, the same person buzzed him again and said Barbara was on the phone again. Barbara was put through to him. Barbara said the pilot had announced that the plane had been hijacked. She asked Olson what she should tell the captain to do. Olson asked her for her location. She said they were over homes and asked someone else in the plane who said they were traveling North East. Olsen told his wife that two planes had been hijacked and hit the WTC. Barbara did not seemed panicked. This call was then cut off. She didn't manifest anything about a crash. Olson then went back to the television and learned of the crash at the Pentagon.

Barbara did not say anything to describe the hijackers, but did refer to them as "they". She told him "they" had knives and box cutters. She did not make any statements about the hijackers stabbing or slashing the passengers.
Barbara Olson's cell phone number is (202) 365-5889. Olson doesn't know if the calls were made from her cell phone or the telephone on the plane. She always has her cell phone with her.

www.911myths.com...



edit on 13-9-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 05:10 PM
link   
a reply to: cardinalfan0596

That is a fallacy. And most people know to stay away from 911 Myths website, it was proven years ago to be full of lies, misinformation, and outright fabrication.

The only people who uses the 911 myths websites are only people who support the OS narratives.

As I posted the evidence in my above posts, the FBI made a public statement that the calls never took place.



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 05:12 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409

You never answered my question about Barbra Olsen alleged phone calls, but just move the goal post instead. Time to MAN UP.

And you are using a well known website known for it's lies as well.

911 Myths is a proven fallacy.
edit on 13-9-2015 by Informer1958 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 05:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: cardinalfan0596
a reply to: Informer1958

FBI file on ATT Operator who received a call asking to be connected to (202) 514-2201 (Ted Olson's DoJ office)

www.911myths.com...

FBI files on notes on phone calls made that day, including an interview with Lori Lynn Keyton about the telephone calls she received from Barbra Olson that day. Ms. Keyton, at the time was Ted Olson's secretary.

www.911myths.com...



So, according to the FBI, Barbra Olson, DID call her husband, she just used an Airfone and not her personal cellphone.


Isn't the point about the phone calls... at least when it comes to Rebekah's information & this thread... is that her theory claims the plane's were on the ground... and that's the only way phone calls could be made?

And the radar hits are due to the 'war games' that were going on that day and were controlled on the ground - since planes weren't air-born.

So if someone was to believe Rebekah, it wouldn't matter if calls were connected or not, because they would have been made by someone on the ground.



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 05:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958

it is very simple, Barbara Olson made the phone calls as confirmed by multiple sources.
edit on 13-9-2015 by skyeagle409 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 05:17 PM
link   
a reply to: Zaphod58

The woman who made the video and wrote the book was an actual stewardess on actual AA flights and states categorically that there were no seatback airphones on these planes at that time. Most recipients of the phone calls stated it was from their loved ones cell phone, many recognising the number with caller id, something that wouldn't have been possible. Other phone calls were alleged to have been made collect and then later in Affidavits submitted in the Moussri trial it was said that passengers made collect calls from airphones, again not possible as the airphones that WERE available at the time, needed to be swiped with a credit card to operate. During the trial the FBI changed their story rather a lot swapping from cell phone calls to airphone calls constantly in their evidencein order to obfucate the fact that cell phone calls cannot be made at altitude

Regardless of the above, most calls were recorded as being made on cell phones..which as most know is not possible on a place flying over a few thousand feet. These planes were at the time of the calls flying at 30,000 approx no cell calls could have been made, the towers in those days and still today did not have the reach...plus back in 2001 each cell phone call needed to "handshake" the next tower on the ground to connect the calls. That would have been impossible to do at the speed the planes were travelling at. The mass of such a large plane also added to the impossibility of one call being connected never mind the dozen or so that allegedly were which I might add were crystal clear recordings with no interference disconnections etc.

Tim Wagner of AA himself stated that there were no phones fitted on 757's for passenger use OR for crew use and that the crew had other means of communication available to them. This then rules out the theory that any of the passengers used airphones

If the Barbara Olsen call was a fabrication and if Ted Olsen lied about actually speaking with his wife on the phone twice, then why is it so difficult to believe the other calls were too? Sad as it is
edit on 13-9-2015 by PhyllidaDavenport because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 05:20 PM
link   
BREAKING 9/11 NEWS: FBI Says Barbara Olsen Did Not Call Ted Olsen. Bush Solicitor General LIED !!


A center piece of the increasingly apparent BULLSH*T story our government and corporate media have fed us for six long years was a complete fabrication!
We were fed a lie by Ted Olsen who served as Solictor General for the Bush Administration, when on 9/11 he held a press conference to tell America and the world that his dead wife had called him before her demise from the jet she was on that had just been hijacked.
Personally, I thought it was odd at the time that a man would decide to hold a press conference minutes after hearing of his own wife’s death, when it happened on 9/11. If my own wife had just died, the last thing I’d want to do would be to talk to anyone, let alone call a press conference. It didn’t “smell” right.

Now we know why it didn’t smell right. It was a lie. The FBI has reported that no such call between Barbara Olsen and Ted Olsen ever took place on 9/11/2001.

It was part of the rapidly unraveling scam that is the official story of 9/11.

In fact, Griffin went on to explain that there is zero evidence that any hijackers had commandeered a plane at all. True Bush believers will say, whao, wait a minute, we all know they did. How do you know? Because Bush told you.

But, as Griffin rightly points out, in this interview, there is no “EVIDENCE” of their existence.
Which also reveals that mis-information shill, Popular Mechanics, in their 9/11 interview on the Charles Goyette Show months ago, lied when they told us there was DNA evidence of the so-called Muslim hijackers. LIES, all lies.


www.fourwinds10.net...

The OS of Barbra Olsen phone call is a lie period.



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 05:23 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958

FURTHERMORE

The Official Story is a lie, PERIOD.

People get suckered every day, and even worse, people spend years defending the lie.

I can't imagine spending year after year defending the OS.... what a waste!!!
edit on 2424x6724America/ChicagovAmerica/Chicago9 by six67seven because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 05:23 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409


it is very simple, Barbara Olson made the phone calls as confirmed by multiple sources.


That is a proven fallacy and you know it. You can not MAN UP when you have been proven wrong.
Yet you continue to hand wave the hard cold facts because they do not support you OS fallacies.

Having this conversion with you is like talking to a brick wall.



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 05:24 PM
link   
a reply to: six67seven



Isn't the point about the phone calls... at least when it comes to Rebekah's information & this thread... is that her theory claims the plane's were on the ground... and that's the only way phone calls could be made?


That is false because I have used my cell phone in flight a couple of times and it is distracting, which is why I now turn it off when I am flying.

Review this phone record and tell us, at what altitude were the two cell phone calls made.

Cell Phone Calls of United 93



And the radar hits are due to the 'war games' that were going on that day and were controlled on the ground - since planes weren't air-born.


You lost me. What planes are you referring to?



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 05:25 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958

That won't work.



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 05:27 PM
link   
a reply to: Bundy




You're right. If this were a false flag attack, it would have been planned months or years in advance. Since there are no official vehicles with men wearing CIA jackets standing around figuring this whole thing out on the ground, it obviously didn't happen that way.


So if explosives were planted months before why did :

Nothing discover the explosives or the cabling . WTC 7 was an occupied building, I know several people who
worked there at Salomon Smith Barney - according to them were packed tighter than sardines

Why nobody discovered anything associated with explosives - detonators, shock tubes, metallic smears
from cutting charges on beams in the rubble

Why were explosives not detonated by fires before



All aboard the shill o clock express.


Your tinfoil is showing........



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 05:27 PM
link   

originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: six67seven



Isn't the point about the phone calls... at least when it comes to Rebekah's information & this thread... is that her theory claims the plane's were on the ground... and that's the only way phone calls could be made?


That is false because I have used my cell phone in flight a couple of times and it is distracting, which is why I now turn it off when I am flying.

Review this phone record and tell us, at what altitude were the two cell phone calls made.

Cell Phone Calls of United 93



And the radar hits are due to the 'war games' that were going on that day and were controlled on the ground - since planes weren't air-born.


You lost me. What planes are you referring to?


Unfortunately, thats not an official log. That's a photo of an excel spreadsheet with no links to official sources. Not credible in the least bit.

and if you don't know what planes I'm referring to... then, oh boy.



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 05:27 PM
link   
a reply to: six67seven



The Official Story is a lie, PERIOD.


Evidence please, because the overwhelming majority of structural and civil engineers, architects, demolition experts and even firefighters support the Official Story.



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 05:28 PM
link   

originally posted by: six67seven
For "us"... or just for you... because no one else brought the (incorrect) West Point similarity but you. Again, nice try, but fail!


Right, because a guy who graduated from the Point would have only one ring on in every picture of him and it would just happen to be *dun dun dunnnnnn* an evil Masonic one!!!!


And sure, here is the pic of Lemnitzer's ring:


Not seeing a Square and Compasses in that.


Why are you asking about it? If you don't know what it looks like then how can you say it looks like a West Point class ring?


Because it did not look like a Masonic ring. Why would a guy who is not a Mason wear a Masonic ring? The only place claiming he is a Mason is the notoriously spurious freemasonrywatch.org where they even think the Queen and the Pope are Masons.



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 05:29 PM
link   
a reply to: six67seven



Unfortunately, thats not an official log. That's a photo of an excel spreadsheet with no links to official sources. Not credible in the least bit.


That is not an adequate reply. Once again, at what altitude were the two cell phone calls made?



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 05:30 PM
link   
a reply to: skyeagle409


That won't work.


You Mann up, of course not.

Your truth is not fact and you can not admit it.



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 05:31 PM
link   
a reply to: Informer1958

911myths, is a website full of documents from FOIA requests, videos and discussions on various aspects of 9/11. Why are you afraid of the truth?




top topics



 
135
<< 11  12  13    15  16  17 >>

log in

join