It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

9/11 Bombshell: Methodical Deception -- Rebekah Roth

page: 1
135
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join
share:
+82 more 
posted on Sep, 12 2015 @ 04:27 PM
link   
Let's start out by saying...I don't know. But it's info I haven't ever heard before now. Quite a few dots connected that are shocking but then again, the entire subject is just that.



What I do know is that we have never been told the truth behind 9/11.

I know that we have a right to know.

I know that if everything checked out to be as the OS states, there would be no questions.

I also know that what the OS states is NOT what actually happened.

I know that if the Govt. wanted to put this all to rest because what they say is the truth, they would be forthcoming with ALL info. Nothing to hide? Nothing to worry about. Sound familiar?

So if this video is yet another piece of crap with no substance we can dismiss it. But there are those here that know a hell of a lot more than myself and I will appreciate their input.

Here is the full interview.

From the YT source:

Source

In this interview Rebekah drops some bombshells that prove not only that 9/11 was a false flag event long in the planning, but that the operation leads directly back to companies and intelligence assets deeply rooted in and connected to the state of Israel.

In fact, some of the information shared in this remarkable interview is so critical for every American to understand that if you don't want to listen to the full interview, at least make sure you fast forward to the 31:20 mark.

Because as Rebekah says, "This is the elephant in the room that nobody wanted to talk about." The pictures you will see and the information you will hear may well shock you to your core. Share it with your friends and family.

Every single American citizen should know the truth about what happened on 9/11 and the months leading up to it - and who the REAL culprits were.


Just passing it along and asking for answers from those that know more than myself. If you believe that coming on here and saying "This is a load of crap" is your hard based evidence, then back it up.

If you think you might have something to say that can change my mind, it won't work.

I don't know as fact as to what, who, how or why but I do know that we are being lied to and that's enough. I do have my own theories as to what, who, how and why but that's for another thread.

So, watch the first vid and if it intrigues you move on to the second and more detailed vid. Then, and only then will it be time to comment.

Jude




edit on 9 12 2015 by jude11 because: (no reason given)



+7 more 
posted on Sep, 12 2015 @ 04:42 PM
link   
a reply to: jude11

Omg, at 1.00 in they show the second plane hitting. I was at the Stevens Institute that day and it was exactly what I saw with my own eyes. I nearly dropped my cell, I didn't think after seeing it so many other ways it would bother me as much. Just never saw that specific video.

Thanks J, I'll comment later if I have something pertinant to add.

AB

Add: That is very odd indeed but I don't understand why they would of needed to do all that extra work, especially on top of the added risk of getting caught. Those jets were sufficient in bringing the TT down but did they want a failsafe also. . .

Bld 7 was absolutely demolished and being an architect that works in NYC I have talked with hundreds of trade professionals in great length about this for 10 years now.
The consensus is without a shadow of a doubt. Even demo experts have explained to me how it could of been done in the time allotted with a crew of 4-6.

So let's again say this is all true for the sake of arguement(the US Corporate Military Industrial Government) is guilty, then what? Revolt, lynching, go through the same system they control, what can be done. . . join Snowden in Russia?
edit on 9/12/2015 by AnteBellum because: add



posted on Sep, 12 2015 @ 04:50 PM
link   
Siverstain.

Mossaud.


+27 more 
posted on Sep, 12 2015 @ 04:50 PM
link   
There is so much evidence out there but it just doesn't matter.
Just like jfk or aliens.
They will never ever ever admit it.

Well, we don't need them to officially admit anything.

I know it. You know it. A lot of people know it.
And knowledge is powerful.
Especially when they expect us to "really believe them".

Do know that those of us that "know" can never be brainwashed.
Tell your kids the truth.
Tell them how evil "they" really are.
Teach them to utilize their knowledge so they can be stronger than the brainwashed sheep that "they" keep churning out.

Die with a smile on your face knowing that they can kill you but that they can't force you to buy it.
edit on 12-9-2015 by NowWhat because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 12 2015 @ 04:53 PM
link   
Hum, the pieces come together, you got to hear what she says at 54:00, gives new meaning to the plane swap..
edit on 12-9-2015 by wildb because: correct time



posted on Sep, 12 2015 @ 04:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: AnteBellum
a reply to: jude11

Omg, at 1.00 in they show the second plane hitting. I was at the Stevens Institute that day and it was exactly what I saw with my own eyes. I nearly dropped my cell, I didn't think after seeing it so many other ways it would bother me as much. Just never saw that specific video.

Thanks J, I'll comment later if I have something pertinant to add.

AB


It's a rare shot indeed.

But what did you think of the "Artists" angle? It's a new bit I hadn't heard about until now.

Jude



posted on Sep, 12 2015 @ 04:54 PM
link   
a reply to: jude11

Whether there is substance here or not, that 8-minute video was about the most unsettling thing I've seen in a long time.

--On to the longer interview!



posted on Sep, 12 2015 @ 04:59 PM
link   

originally posted by: Aliensun
a reply to: jude11

Whether there is substance here or not, that 8-minute video was about the most unsettling thing I've seen in a long time.

--On to the longer interview!



I'm 3/4 thru the longer one and all I can say is wow.

There is a lot to digest but I have a feeling we are looking at something closer to the truth than we've seen in a long time.

Jude



posted on Sep, 12 2015 @ 05:13 PM
link   
a reply to: jude11

I added a comment to my original.

The Woolworth missile thing really had me questioning this whole story, which is quite good at first glance, much better then most others I've read.

I have a home in Mid-Manhattan and there is no way thousands would not of seen(or heard) this projectile. Everyone was watching at that point in time, all eyes were looking up.

I need to dig a bit on the labeling on those boxes, without that evidence things start to get cloudy.

That's where I remembered it, BB 18's are also floor mounted steel wall studs, like ones used in TT renovations and construction. I wish I could get the words on those boxes any good photo enhancing guys here?
edit on 9/12/2015 by AnteBellum because: add



posted on Sep, 12 2015 @ 05:13 PM
link   
I started at the 30 minute mark and nearly finished it off. I'm stunned.

I've always stayed out of 9/11 arguments just because it is very difficult to follow all of the theory and motive sometimes. She laid it out beautifully (especially the part about the lady who saw the plane flying north to the base when it should have been crashing in NYC).

Amazing stuff, maybe today gives me another chance to reexamine the "day after".

a reply to: jude11




posted on Sep, 12 2015 @ 05:23 PM
link   
Thanks, will have to go through the whole things. I hope others get to see it. It's disturbing so far to those who are just delving into the topic, but for everyone else who was hoping it's not this way may also be in for a shock. Whether conclusive to being something here or not there may be at least some of it that really adds up.



posted on Sep, 12 2015 @ 05:32 PM
link   

originally posted by: AnteBellum
a reply to: jude11

I added a comment to my original.

The Woolworth missile thing really had me questioning this whole story, which is quite good at first glance, much better then most others I've read.

I have a home in Mid-Manhattan and there is no way thousands would not of seen(or heard) this projectile. Everyone was watching at that point in time, all eyes were looking up.

I need to dig a bit on the labeling on those boxes, without that evidence things start to get cloudy.

That's where I remembered it, BB 18's are also floor mounted steel wall studs, like ones used in TT renovations and construction. I wish I could get the words on those boxes any good photo enhancing guys here?


I get this:

www.cooperindustries.com... pport/bb-18.html

Open box Support secures
boxes and plaster rings
between studs 16” and 24”
on center.
• Accommodates 4”, 4
and multi-gang boxes.
• Open design allows infinite
adjustability - box can be
placed in any horizontal
position along the bracket.
• Stamped markings at
and 1” increments
allow the installer to easily
locate the desired box
position

And this:

www.littelfuse.com...

Safe distribution of power to multiple fuse holders in a compact design is a key objective for panel designers. The Littelfuse UL508 bus bar system eliminates most wire terminations in a time saving package. A power distribution block and associated conductors are no longer needed to feed multiple POWR-SAFE™ fuse holders.

Either one raises questions as to why art students would be in this room with climbing gear and building a ramp.

Jude



posted on Sep, 12 2015 @ 05:35 PM
link   
a reply to: jude11

The first video was definitely new info for me.

So, like a dog pissing on a fire hydrant, I'm marking this for later viewing.

Thanks for posting Jude
F&S



posted on Sep, 12 2015 @ 05:40 PM
link   

originally posted by: Flatfish
a reply to: jude11

The first video was definitely new info for me.

So, like a dog pissing on a fire hydrant, I'm marking this for later viewing.

Thanks for posting Jude
F&S



Yeah, me too.

I thought I had seen it all. The problem was always a re-hashing of everything old.

Now we have this and if even a shred is conclusive we have a new trail to follow.

Jude



posted on Sep, 12 2015 @ 05:42 PM
link   
a reply to: jude11

I'm starting the longer vid now. Just had to say, so many do not believe the OS, and yet 14 years later we are still nowhere near the truth. It's sad that our government refuse to be open and honest with the citizens that make them able to pull off crap like this.

This has got to stop. When is our time to demand honesty? Bunch of lying fools, IMO.


+5 more 
posted on Sep, 12 2015 @ 05:58 PM
link   
S&F


In all the years I have researched 911, this is new information and now supports evidence of demolition in the WTC's.
Has anyone sent this information to A&E?

This will back up their technical papers of demolition.

Not only is this credible, the photos are a slam dunk proving hundreds of fuse holders were in the WTC. This alone would hold up in any court room as evidence.

There is no reason for anyone to have fuse holders in the WTC unless they were going to demolish the buildings.

I always suspected Dick Chaney had something to do with being one of the terrorist who helped plot 911 and now we find out that Halliburton had their dirty hands in it as well.

This info needs to go viral I am going to post it on Face Book.



posted on Sep, 12 2015 @ 06:05 PM
link   
a reply to: jude11

Large commercial buildings like the TT's have there own construction staff(glorified superintendents) used to make repairs and alteration on the fly as required. Most of these buildings also keep spare, left over material in specific floors(areas) designated for building use only(a private storeroom).
The boxes don't look stacked to me but placed there for protection against damaging the walls(look at the cut half boxes in the window shot), which since this is temporary, would have been a cheap way to accomplish this, using garbage from previous renovations.
The TT had many of these locations and if they were removing windows chances are they would only allow it in these specific areas to not disturb other tenants. Makes sense and I've seen it done more then a few times.

As for the fuse angle I would have to see if these are used for that purpose, which I have no idea.
I've only been involved in one demo that used explosives and the fuses shown(BB 18) look a bit 'beefy' from the quick connect systems I've seen that day. Not a demolitions expert though.

Many buildings in NYC have these events to raise publicity or ads, happens more often then you think. Just for the movie 'Devils Advocate' alone more then a dozen real locations were used, even Trump's private penthouse. Now the big trend is 'selfies in high up places' but Dubai is the main attraction with its cloud clipping heights.

Really the validity of these stories doesn't matter to me anymore, I know Bld 7 was 'pulled' and that speaks volumes.
In my best personal summation I feel terrorists pulled 911 off and we didn't stop it in time.
Then Bld 7 was demo'd to cover up something.
Then the US analyst's took a bad situation and turned it into a positive by use of war and the Patriot Act. The rest is history, with strong motives against Russia and China using an energy grab in the Middle East as the goal.
edit on 9/12/2015 by AnteBellum because: add



posted on Sep, 12 2015 @ 06:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: Informer1958
S&F


In all the years I have researched 911, this is new information and now supports evidence of demolition in the WTC's.
Has anyone sent this information to A&E?

This will back up their technical papers of demolition.

Not only is this credible, the photos are a slam dunk proving hundreds of fuse holders were in the WTC. This alone would hold up in any court room as evidence.

There is no reason for anyone to have fuse holders in the WTC unless they were going to demolish the buildings.

I always suspected Dick Chaney had something to do with being one of the terrorist who helped plot 911 and now we find out that Halliburton had their dirty hands in it as well.

This info needs to go viral I am going to post it on Face Book.


Agreed.

The more I view the last vid and rewind along with checking a few points on searches, the more it's starting to come together.

I'm waiting for the deniers to chime in tho. That should be interesting.

Jude



edit on 9 12 2015 by jude11 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 12 2015 @ 06:12 PM
link   
a reply to: AnteBellum


Then Bld 7 was demo'd to cover up something.

www.wtc7.net...

They covered up our knowledge of the 9/11 plus much more IMO.
Littered with Gov agencies and financial agencies.

Pretty sure there was some big investigations involving banks and the SEC at the time as well.

edit on thSat, 12 Sep 2015 18:13:58 -0500America/Chicago920155880 by Sremmos80 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 12 2015 @ 06:12 PM
link   
a reply to: AnteBellum




Really the validity of these stories doesn't matter to me anymore, I know Bld 7 was 'pulled' and that speaks volumes. In my best personal summation I feel terrorists pulled 911 off and we didn't stop it in time. Then Bld 7 was demo'd to cover up something. Then the US analyst's took a bad situation and turned it into a positive by use of war and the Patriot Act. The rest is history, with strong motives against Russia and China using an energy grab in the Middle East as the goal.


Agreed. 7 was pulled

Terrorists of course. But in the new description of terrorists we can lay that label on anyone. Bush, Cheney, Hop Sing from the local Chinese Food Store.

7 was pulled either to cover up, take advantage of a huge insurance pay out or both. But the issue is...That it was rigged BEFORE the 11th in order to do so so there was advance knowledge of events to come.

The Patriot Act being ready and printed so quickly is another indicator of fore knowledge.

Jude




top topics



 
135
<<   2  3  4 >>

log in

join