It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Lynch Orders Prosecutors To Lock Up Wall Street Execs

page: 6
26
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 11:58 AM
link   
a reply to: neo96

I think the whole thing is just a diversion from the real problems that they don't want to "enforce".





posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 11:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: neo96

I think the whole thing is just a diversion from the real problems that they don't want to "enforce".



It is all anyone has to do is look at what else is going on.



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 01:11 PM
link   
a reply to: StoutBroux

Yes, you are most likely correct. It seems a form of magic. The reason I kind of like it to witchcraft is because these are groups of people who make secret pacts or covenants with each other to benefit off the unawares demise. On the other hand I find the term distasteful knowing what atrocities have been committed against innocent people throughout the world's history in the attempts to stamp out witchcraft.



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 03:17 PM
link   

originally posted by: undo
a reply to: Boadicea

well not to mention the whole "get the corporations" theme from the socialist side, is smoke and mirrors since the corporations are what is funding socialist movements world wide.

socialism=captive market.


Yes, because there is no other reason to prosecute them beside the socialist agenda, it's not like they've been screwing people and the system with complete impunity. Must be those wraskley socialists trying to ruin the fun of cronyism again! How dare you try to protect people with regulations you socialist scum!



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 03:26 PM
link   

originally posted by: mahatche

originally posted by: undo
a reply to: Boadicea

well not to mention the whole "get the corporations" theme from the socialist side, is smoke and mirrors since the corporations are what is funding socialist movements world wide.

socialism=captive market.


Yes, because there is no other reason to prosecute them beside the socialist agenda, it's not like they've been screwing people and the system with complete impunity. Must be those wraskley socialists trying to ruin the fun of cronyism again! How dare you try to protect people with regulations you socialist scum!


i think you read that wrong. if the people who claim they are going to punish big corporations are in cahoots with the corporations they aren't going to punish anyone. for example, several of the big corps, including car companies, were invested heavily into the soviet union and the rise of bolshevism. yet these same guys have big unions in their industries in the usa. it's all the same banana. in the meantime, using free labor (read slave labor) in the ussr, the corporations were able to literally squash alot of their competition by drastically underpricing their products.

globalism=mass slavery. in case you didn't get the memo.



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 03:48 PM
link   
a reply to: undo

And if our military steps up to a coup?
The peole would nd be HOSTILE to the idea,preserving the nationstate is a republic being the objective?
dailycallernewsfoundation.org...



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 04:03 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
This might fit right into the Bernie Sanders Campaign.





Could be....maybe it's just prelude to the robin hood financial transaction tax they have planned. I bet Soros never gets locked up by these crooks.
edit on 13-9-2015 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 05:43 PM
link   
a reply to: ThirdEyeofHorus

Since I doubt Rush Limbaugh will talk about this angle of it, here you go:

The Pros and Cons of Bernie Sanders’ $50 Billion Tax Idea


Calls for introducing a Financial Transaction Tax have grown since the financial crisis and the Great Recession, and the concept has been just below the surface of many recent discussions of tax reform in the U.S.

But before any debate over the idea heats up, a new study from the Tax Policy Center busts some of the myths surrounding the tax

and comes up with a bottom line finding that, if properly implemented, it could raise $50 billion a year without seriously affecting the operation of the financial markets.


Just so you know.

Tax Policy Center

FINANCIAL TRANSACTION TAXES IN THEORY AND PRACTICE
Leonard E. Burman, William G. Gale, Sarah Gault, Bryan Kim, Jim Nunns, and Steve Rosenthal
June 2015 (Updated July 31, 2015)


The Great Recession, which is largely thought to be due to financial market failures, has
prompted renewed calls for a financial transactions tax (FTT) to discourage excessive risk
taking and recoup the costs of the crisis.

The chorus of FTT advocates includes Bill Gates, Jr., George Soros, and Pope Benedict XVI (Greenhouse and Bowley 2011). The idea is
not new, however. Keynes proposed an FTT in 1936 as a way to discourage the kind of speculation that fueled the stock market bubble that led to the Great Depression.

More recently, leading economists Tobin (1978), Stiglitz (1989), and Summers and Summers
(1989) have advocated similar taxes.

Taxes on financial transactions have a long history. The British stamp duty was
enacted in 1694 and remains in effect today. The United States imposed a nontrivial
stock transactions tax from 1914 to 1965, as did New York State from 1905 to 1981.

An extremely small securities transfer tax currently funds the Securities and Exchange
Commission (SEC). FTTs have long been popular in less developed countries as a way to
raise significant revenue from a small number of relatively sophisticated financial entities.



edit on 9/13/2015 by BuzzyWigs because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 06:01 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

I think the whole thing is just a diversion from the real problems that they don't want to "enforce".

Like...what?

a reply to: neo96

It is all anyone has to do is look at what else is going on.


Like...what?

In my opinion, you two and your cryptic, evasive posts don't help anything at all. Just so you know.


edit on 9/13/2015 by BuzzyWigs because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 06:09 PM
link   
a reply to: BuzzyWigs

You *actually* trust the Obama Administration ?

There's always a hidden agenda.




posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 06:19 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

You *actually* trust the Obama Administration ?

Nope! Not any more....at first, I had high hopes and expectations, which vanished without explanation.......

So -

No, I don't. That's why I'm paying attention to Bernie. (I kinda thought you were, too....but - I'm sure that's a figment of my imagination. You are a master at not saying anything while saying things and smiling/laughing. Don't blame me - I've told you repeatedly that I don't understand your style of communication.)



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 08:13 PM
link   
a reply to: BuzzyWigs




Like...what? In my opinion, you two and your cryptic, evasive posts don't help anything at all. Just so you know.


Seriously ?



Take your pick.

The crap deal with Iran.

CLinton's servers fiasco.

Refguees all over the globe.

Terrorism is bigger and badder than ever.

Hey throw out them evil rich crap for the 7th year in a row.


edit on 13-9-2015 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 08:58 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96



Seriously ?

Yeah, neo.
Seriously.

Do you think you could possibly just explain???? without insulting 'some people'? Is that in keeping with your repertoire??????


Or, never mind.
I know your thing is to make incoherent posts and run.....

I'm done asking you to please engage in an actual conversation. Sorry I don't measure up to your level of sagacity and righteousness. (Not.)

edit on 9/13/2015 by BuzzyWigs because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 09:03 PM
link   
a reply to: BuzzyWigs

Well I guess it's perfectly acceptable to insult rich folks/Wall Street exec constantly calling the crooks.

Then sic a government agency on them. Which one could easily call another GESTAPO branch of the Administration, after the IRS.


edit on 13-9-2015 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 09:07 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

wut?

The entire thread is about holding the banksters accountable!!

Like Iceland did....throw their corrupt asses in prison!! And Iceland is now doing great......

oh, wait. You think the Nordic model is communism.




edit on 9/13/2015 by BuzzyWigs because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 09:12 PM
link   
a reply to: BuzzyWigs




The entire thread is about holding the banksters accountable!!


Which is LAUGHABLE, and sounds like the DOJ and the current administration got their talking points from the script of Contiuum.

Much like that tv show, and POLITICS in general they BOTH are a WORK of fiction.

It is simply amazing how our government is never responsible for anything they ever do.

It's ALWAYS 'wall stree is corrupt'.

When our elected official make WALL STREET look like rank amateurs.



posted on Sep, 13 2015 @ 09:13 PM
link   
a reply to: neo96

yeah, never mind. I tried.

Honestly, I don't think you've looked at ANY of Bernie's policies or points. He's just as adamant about gov corruption as I am (and, I guess, you are). But - don't go out of your way to investigate. Nono...that would be SO beneath you.
edit on 9/13/2015 by BuzzyWigs because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 14 2015 @ 12:50 AM
link   
Well...what is the point of getting rid of most of the"1%" and
leaving the worst of that in Congressional, Legislative, Executive power?

The revolving door between Washington and Wall Street
would not thrive without the corruption in Washington.

Take out any CEO, CFO, that is just more cover for the
lifetime politicians who go retire in 1%.

Politicians must be held accountable, otherwise
witch hunts are just a ruse.



















edit on 14-9-2015 by burntheships because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 14 2015 @ 08:50 AM
link   
Actually... it doesn't matter. So, it IS "Bread and Circus".

If you think back... things started unravelling in 2007, and finally blew up in 2008. Many/most of the criminal fraud and looting had already taken place (the PEAK was in 2005).

With a little simple arithmetic... we quickly understand that the Statute of Limitations (SOL) has already run out on the bulk of the criminal activity. Now, the same is not true of the people in power and in the DOJ that ran block on prosecutions, and gutting/corrupting any regulatory agencies that could have raised a stink.

So, good luck getting the Obama administration, to investigate the Obama administration. (NOTE: Massive criminal activity took place during Bush/Cheney as well... but SOL protects them too... against all prosecutions besides murder.)

Isn't it fascinating, that SOL is also the acronym for "s**t outta luck"?

a reply to: stosh64



posted on Sep, 14 2015 @ 09:03 AM
link   
a reply to: StoutBroux

Election bravado if you ask me.

Hot air and no action.




top topics



 
26
<< 3  4  5    7 >>

log in

join