Woman Claims She Raised a Baby Bigfoot

Im sorry but i just can't buy this rubbish,it screams like it is a session from some horrible daytime tv like Jerry Springer ......

Anyhow moving on....I love you Jerry

a reply to: CIAGypsy

I've had nothing better to do and just dreamed dreams that had nothing to do with them and stumbled onto them in reality. As a psychic it blows even my mind the way it happened. As far as raising these things that is beyond comprehension for me personally. Not like raising a orphaned known animal is it. I have witnessed the ability of these creatures to hypnotize twice in about a 1 year span. It is interesting to say the least. I have a theory on the actual mechanism for that but I need more information.

Ah.
The mother of Harry in "Harry and the Harrisons" finally speaks.

Harry and the Hendersons? Sounds like she needs a boyfriend.
a reply to: UnBreakable

a reply to: Parthin96

www.youtube.com...

You wanna catch gravity and matter all at once just gimmie a call. These creatures are known to take women and children and they love smoked goods as well as birds. They evolved with these trees here.

I got an old white guy that has seen the foot back in the day while pleasure cruising with his crew way back when. This old guy I trust enough to have seen one phenotype, the one that was adapted to helens and surrounding areas before the eruption( this guy is bright but is a jesus freak but he would talk straight enough.) I would guess it is far more tough than the northern types having seen the northern beast.

I have a rather interesting anecdote from an area in the Pacific Northwest which could be considered Sasquatch Central! It's an utterly
Wild area comprising over 10,000 square miles of extremely rugged terrain starting from Port Moody, British Columbia, Canada all the way out to Hope/Princeton, British Columbia, Canada
which is truly a wild place!

About 3 years ago a series of interesting photos
were shown to me taken as video prints from
MiniDV tape footage originally shot at a
resolution of 720 by 480 pixels but
Blown up to an 8.5 inch by 11 inch print.

The footage was originally taken more than 20 km northwest of Pitt Lake west of an old logging camp settlement called Alvin.

The photo prints i saw were extremely clear
Considering their MiniDV video source and
were quite closeup. This video was very similar
To other footage taken years earlier in the kootenay mountain region of BC with each video
And printout showing a creature's facial region
Where the lower facial Region with jaw and
cheeks, nose and mouth being distinctly
Asiatic Human very similar to those of
Nepalese/Chinese mountain region origins.

The upper facial area with eyes, brow,
ears and forehead being in my opinion
Either orangutan or chimp-like. It seemed
Hybrid like to me. Half ape and half human.

The Kootenay region video was taken by
a "bigfoot researcher" who had ready video
Of bigfoot faces and of creatures throwing
rocks at him.

I understand those videos have been on Youtube
for some time now. The north Pitt Lake video
Was taken by Placer Gold prospectors, and as
far as I know, has never been publicly released
In its entirety due to issues of preserving
Gold mining claim secrecy...which is a
common and long-term issue in that
Part of British Columbia. I saw the photos
for two minutes or less and had no chance to
Take a cell phone photo of the printouts.

I do understand that printouts of possibly up
To 10 frames ARE now on various websites
Although i only saw three frames.

Again, the lower facial features to me were
very Asiatic but upper region were orangutan
or chimp-like.

The photos of the Pitt Lake creature and the Kootenay creature I thought were nearly
Identical in facial structure but for the fact
that i thought the Pitt River photos had
a more aged-looking creature.
(i.e. An older more wisened "person")

Recent sightings within the last two years
near Mission BC also remarked where
some witnesses thought they saw an
"Old Chinese Guy" but like 7 feet plus tall !!!

Is Hybridization at work here with modern
Homo Sapien being mated with earlier stage
Hominid? Asiatic peoples did cross the
The Bering Sea ice bridge over ten thousand
years ago...they could have mated (or more
likely were FORCED to mate!) with a much
larger and stronger genetically related hominid
Close enough to us that conception was possible!

That hominid could have already been present
In North America due to migration over the
Bering Sea ice bridges from earlier glacial
periods such as that from about 75,000+ years
earlier caused by the Toba supervolcano event
which constricted human genetic diversity due
to a relatively sudden onset of Nuclear Winter
like conditions.

That forced human/hominid migration
due to reduced food supplies could have
split humans into genetically related
sub-species that later adapted to local
conditions thus giving rise to larger and
stronger hominids in North America way
before the 2nd Great Migration of Asiatics
60,000 Years later!

a reply to: UnBreakable

She calls it an animal and then says it speaks?

Ummm no! Flush this one and I'm believer.

The Todd Standing kootenay region video
Link is here:

bigfootevidence.blogspot.ca...


I cannot vouch for the veracity of this Kootenay
Creature video still but the Pitt Lake images are
similar...with Asiatic lower face..but more Simian orangutan eyes.

I also understand there is huge controversy
With Todd Standing where it is said his photos
And videos were possibly faked with himself
as the actor....BUT...again, the stills I saw
were very similar in facial structure although
i would say I saw longer straighter hair
more yak-like In the Pitt Lake photos.

I should note that other description of
Sasqatch have noted the "Old Chinese Guy"
Descriptor within sightings going back up
To 100 years ago...ergo...possible Asiatic
Human .... I.e. Early North American Indian
Mated with genetically related unknown Hominid!

That's so awesome. Definitely have heard of things similar like this before. Doesn't surprise me this is true, they are very much so how she claims them to be.

I want to show the world about bigfoot! I just won't show you anything.

Why do we even bother ourselves with wasting time on unsubstantiated claims? Anyone can claim anything.

I don't believe her for 1 second.

It's so annoying that people feel the need to start posts with "I did a search on here but didn't see anything. If so, mods please remove." Just post the damn info and let the mods worry about it.

originally posted by: Argyll
a reply to: UnBreakable

When asked about evidence such as pictures she replied that she has some she keeps in a secret spot. “Oh you rascal, the only reason I wanted to tell you my story is to show the world these animals are beautiful creatures. But I would never, ever, betray my best friends

So show the world then.....lets see the pictures from the "secret spot"....because publishing her "secret journal" for a few dollars wouldn't be betraying her "best friends" at all would it?

She sounds like a chancer to me.

"It's very difficult emotionally for me to come forward to the world and explain this story. People will think I'm crazy, nuts, or worse, I may end in an insane asylum!

I have the proof to show them all how wrong they are though... I just won't show the proof. Don't worry about it and believe me though, the proof is in a safe place!"

Sincerely,
Super Serious Person

originally posted by: lambros56
There was a lady on Art Bell's Midnight in the desert show a couple of nights ago.
I think she said her name was Elaine and she claims she has a Bigfoot living in a wood or forest near her home.
She says it comes to her yard and has done since around 2007.

It was a good interview and most of the callers believed her story.
To be honest, she sounded credible to me.

Yes, I remember a story about her. I think the B-Foot asked for honey for it fur or something. I even think I recall her mentioning tomatoes.
Basically, I don't believe this story just yet, but thanks for posting it.

Maybe the baby had hypertrichosis sydrome
so the parents didn't want it and then abandoned it in the woods.

Of course it's not true but it's still kinda fun... and a bit of you wants to believe.

originally posted by: skoalman88
It's so annoying that people feel the need to start posts with "I did a search on here but didn't see anything. If so, mods please remove." Just post the damn info and let the mods worry about it.

Well, Jackwagon, you annoy me. Then don't read and reply if it bothers you.

Could be true but I'd think a baby Bigfoot would raise a few eyebrows, kinda hard to explain why the baby is hairy

a reply to: UnBreakable

Too bad you couldn't comprehend that my comment was directed at the rules of this website not at you, champ.

a reply to: UnBreakable

Sounds plausible, the only problem is that Bigfoot are likely adapted to high mountains and deep coniferous rain forests which is the opposite of LA.