It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
500 first responders explosions or bombs/911
It is already known after 14 years, that no demo explosives were involved and that the explosions people heard had nothing to do with explosives.
Even seismic monitors in the area did not detect demo explosions and that is very significant because you can't hide demo explosions and yet, none of the monitors picked up demo explosions.
The seis mic signals propagating from New York on September 11, 2001, recorded at Palisades (34 km) and published by the Lamont - Doherty Earth Observatory of Columbia University (LDEO), have here been subjected to a new critical study concerning their sources. The a im of this paper is to demonstrate that the nature of the waves, their velocities, frequencies, and magnitudes invalidate the official explanations which imply as sources the percussion of the twin towers by planes and the collapses of the three buildings, WTC1, WTC2 and WTC7
In addition, explosions continued even after the WTC buildings collapsed, which simply means that explosions had nothing to do with demo explosives.
In addition, no demo explosions are seen nor heard on video as the WTC buildings collapsed
nor found in the rubble of the WTC buildings at ground zero and you can't hide such evidence either.
The rubble was hauled away and shipped overseas without it being investigated. You know this.
Are you saying that nohing was picked up, or can you prove that what was picked up were not demo explosions?
Important pieces of WTC steel were inspected at ground zero and at the Fresh Kills landfill. Only certain pieces of the steel structures were examined because you don't inspect every single piece of steel of their structures, only the steel that is important in an investigation.
I even posed with a piece of WTC steel at the Rio Vista Airport in California a couple of years ago. Other pieces of WTC steel were used in the construction of the USS New York.
No, because the seismic monitors detected the aircraft impacts and the collapse of the WTC buildings, but detected no demo explosions at ground zero. We can take a look here and notice that the aircraft impacts and building collapses were detected, but no demo explosions.
. The new interpretation presented here renders the assertions of the seismic analysis of the events at the WTC, as presented by the government in the NIST and other reports, null and void. On the co ntrary, all the documented evidence points to explosions as the source of the recorded seismic signals
Add to the fact that no demo explosions are heard as WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7 collapsed,
originally posted by: RogueWave
a reply to: intrptr
Maybe there is a substance in your eyes.
Point out any claim that I should back up, and I will.
Can you prove that the videos in question did not have their audio altered?
BS. There has been no official investigation into the rubble and only a very small fraction was preserved.
Can you prove they were altered?
Prove there was no official investigation,