It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It's been hijacked by disinfo, not wild mental theories. INTENTIONALLY wild mental theories. That's how they discredit all truthers -- everyone who questions the OS gets lumped in with the disinfo and the people who fall for the disinfo.
Gordon Duff Confesses to Posting 40% False Information
"If I Didn't Write False Information I Wouldn't be Alive..." -
Disinformation Killed 9/11 “Truth”
By 2009, the 9/11 “Truth” Movement was so inundated with disinformation that it had become a laughingstock. The easily-discredited claims (lies) contaminated the greater issue and soiled dissenters across the board. “Turd blossom” was a Karl Rove phrase that could describe what the movement had devolved into. The media, whether corporate or foundation-funded, could find people ranting about “the Jews” or the Illuminati, the Lizard People, the missiles, holograms, mini-nukes or space beam weapons vaporizing the Twin Towers.
Many trolls, and some public personalities, appeared to be professional disinformation artists hard at work concocting and posting this crap online, which others repeated to their own detriment. One cannot easily prove that a specific person is a paid shill, a disinformation agent, a cyber agent provocateur, but be assured they are out there, and “out there.”
DISINFORMATION TO DISCREDIT
Author Thomas Pynchon wrote, “If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don’t have to worry about answers.” I’ll go one better and in the process explain modern cyber disinformation: If they can get you asking stupid questions, then their lapdog media can dismiss you as a “nut.”
That’s how it works, people. Well beyond questions, they have long lassoed a whole generation of newbies into reposting pseudo evidence about the 9/11 attacks, as if these were established facts. That’s FUD, using bogus evidence to taint those who choose to pass it on.
Photographs or sound bites are taken out of context to fabricate some new angle that no one had ever noticed before. More often than not, that was because these new findings were patently false. So much sloppy research and twisted factoids peppered the 9/11 “Truth” universe that the very concept of truth itself was devalued in the process.
Why weren't the sounds that were heard during the destruction of the WTC skyscrapers on 9/11 as loud as the blasts heard in videos of acknowledged controlled demolitions?
As 9/11 researcher Jim Hoffman points out at 911research.com, the continuous and rapid explosions of the Twin Towers would make distinct explosions nearly impossible to hear, except perhaps by those who were right next to the Towers. A news clip from Fox shows witnesses in midtown NYC stating that the explosive roar of the Towers’ demise sounded like “another large aircraft flying overhead.” These roaring sound waves were heard miles away.
originally posted by: skyeagle409
a reply to: DarthFazer
Molten metal was seen pouring out the lower floors.
Molten aluminum was seen flowing from the northeast corner of WTC2, which is the exact location where much of the aluminum airframe came to rest. In addition, many aluminum panels were installed on the exterior of the WTC buildings.
A woman standing in the gaping hole from the Boeings impact when it was spose to be "burning out of control" ect ect inconsistency after another with the OS
There was no question the WTC buildings were on fire. Ever wondered why people were jumping from the upper stories of the WTC buildings?
Your plane hitting the pentagon theory does not hold up.
Planes made of aluminum do not disintegrate leaving no cabin behind.
... Whatever exploded in or out the pentagon was NOT a commercial airliner. Because commercial airliners dont defy the laws of physics when entering a solid object.
Windsor Building Fire
Photo: Concrete Structure Remains Standing After Collapse of its Outer Steel Structure
A survey of the fire damaged structure of the Windsor Tower, Madrid, has concluded that the concrete structure “performed extraordinarily well in a severe fire”.
The study, ‘Fire in the Windsor building, Madrid: Survey of the fire resistance and residual bearing capacity of the structure after the fire’ was carried out by the Spanish Instituto Technico de Materiales y Construcciones (INTEMAC). It underlined the need for fireproofing structural steel concluding that the “need for fireproofing of steel members to guarantee their performance in the event of fire was reconfirmed”.
The Windsor Tower fire started on the 21st floor of the 32 storey building in February 2005. The fire quickly spread due to a lack of fire stops between the curtain wall façade and the concrete floor slabs. Designed and built in the 1970s, the tower was built using traditional design methods. Extensive refurbishment was underway at the time of the fire. Ironically, part of the refurbishment programme was to bring the building’s fire standards up-to-date with the installation of active fire prevention and resistance measures.
Structural failure happened with the collapse of the steel perimeter columns which resulted with the floor slabs collapsing as the edge support was taken away.
The massive concrete transfer slab at the 20th floor prevented further progressive failure.
Many truthers were using conspiracy websites that are well-known for spewing disinformation and in some cases, outright lies. They have used 'Pilots for 9/11 Truth' as a reference, but I have caught 'Pilots For 9/11 Truth' spewing disinformation and lies and I have confronted the founder of that website and let him know that what he was posting was false, yet he continues to post disinformation and lies and truthers continue to use his website as a reference source, whereas, they continue spread debunked disinformation and lies to other message boards.
Because commercial airliners dont defy the laws of physics when entering a solid object.
The laws of physics, commons sense, and factual history backup what I say.
Case in point; Demo explosives when detonated, make a lot of noise, a lot of noise that is not heard as WTC1, WTC2, and WTC7 collapse, which explains why demo explosions were not detected by seismic monitors in the area and why no demo explosive hardware was ever found at ground zero.
The laws of physics do not back up what you say period.
Of course the laws of physics back up what I say and as an example, provide us with the time line where demo explosions are heard in the following WTC7 video.
You think you are funny. In my opinion all these videos you have posted have been tampered with and explosions edited out, and you know this. Yet you continue to spam the threads with pseudo videos.
originally posted by: skyeagle409
I use my decades-long experience to determine when to hold 'em and when to throw 'em.
Like you using 911 Myths as your sources and many others Shill disinformation websites that are very bias and only support the lies of the OS.
That won't work, because even seismic monitors failed to detect demo explosions at ground zero.
Now, please point out the time lines in the videos where explosions are heard.
Who doesn't use their knowledge and experience to determine what is credible?