It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
The gist of the idea is solid: women/females do not participate at the same rate as males do in the computer sciences. Further, the level of participation is markedly different. For example, it isn't often you find female database designers.
The approach....can't say that its good use of funding. But honestly, I can't say that it is a terrible use of funding, either. I can see some abstract ways that benefit could be had.
I think the root problem is that women have less overall participation in the non-biological sciences to begin with.
TL;DR: lets not throw out the baby with the bath water here.
How are they going to fit into the workforce when they can't focus or concentrate on the task at hand because of "rabid pronoun sensitivity"?
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
originally posted by: neo96
That terminology is used basically because everyone understands it, and requires little explanation.
If this gender fluidity nonsense catches on, the above common sense and standard knowledge will be lost within a generation or two. Western society has parodied the Biblical verse "choking on gnats while swallowing camels." But sure, let's go ahead and waste another $350,000 as supported largely by people who dismiss the "tiny amount of money" it represents while utterly losing their proverbial *snip* over a politician who proposes any $350,000 cut to a program they love.
originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul
IMO it is infinitely preferable that someone DOES study the issue and figure out whether it is real or not, than that it is decided by a bunch of misogynist comments on a forum like this.
originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul
a reply to: Reallyfolks
Given the comments on this thread, how many of their (mostly male) managers do you think might have paid any attention to anything they said??
originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul
IMO it is infinitely preferable that someone DOES study the issue and figure out whether it is real or not, than that it is decided by a bunch of misogynist comments on a forum like this.
originally posted by: Aloysius the Gaul
a reply to: Reallyfolks
Given the comments on this thread, how many of their (mostly male) managers do you think might have paid any attention to anything they said??
originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: neo96
And the question is, how spending all that money is going to help with productivity?