It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

"the media secretly tries to prevent the evolution of new cancer medication"

page: 1
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 05:13 AM
link   
there have been increasingly many conspiracies ever since this decade that certain parties / communities / companies are trying to prevent the evolution of new cancer medication.

the idea is, at bottom: there a ways to develep new medication, probably even at hand already, but diversification of that information is being prevented / prohibited / sabotaged.

what do you think about that conspiracy "milieu"?




posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 05:18 AM
link   
a reply to: peterp



what do you think about that conspiracy "milieu"?

That's its been discussed numerous times already, with the only difference being that usually the OP cites a new study or medicine that garners discussion...




posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 05:25 AM
link   
a reply to: BestinShow

i did that and the thread immediately got removed. please see my other threads as i will not repost links here. the input i wanted to provide can easily be found there. also i intended this to be a general discussion, with pro / contra for the idea itself.



posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 05:26 AM
link   
a reply to: peterp
Clickbait is not a valid basis for a thread.



posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 05:27 AM
link   
a reply to: peterp

Forgive the harshness of my counterpart above me their . But as he stated it has indeed been talked about for many moons here on ATS. And without a doubt I beleve the MSM censors allot of stuff. The internet is the best option for finding options.



posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 05:36 AM
link   
a reply to: Kapusta
You seem to have missed the link which was originally in the OP. It had absolutely nothing to do with what the OP is "about."
That would be the reason it was removed.

Clickbait. Seems the mods are being charitable by allowing the thread to remain at all.

edit on 9/9/2015 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 05:39 AM
link   

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Kapusta
You seem to have missed the link which was originally in the OP. It had absolutely nothing to do with what the OP is "about."
That would be the reason it was removed.



Yes , indeed . however I was not searching for a link and I was referring to bestunshow's somewhat harsh tone.

Maybe I just took it as such .

But thanks for the heads up

edit on 06/17/2015 by Kapusta because: (no reason given)

edit on 06/17/2015 by Kapusta because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 05:54 AM
link   
i intend this to be an in-depth general discussion.



posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 06:03 AM
link   

originally posted by: peterp
i intend this to be an in-depth general discussion.


No worries we can pick this thread back up.

Do you have any other links you would like to share or maybe some info ?



posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 06:55 AM
link   
Dear peterp:

Why should Big Pharma do this? What would they win?
More money? I doubt that.



posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 07:03 AM
link   
It's an interesting point (despite whatever link in the OP left members perturbed).

From a conspiracy mind the big companies and governments are definitely suppressing cures.

From a common sense point of view - I doubt they are.

On a personal level it's frustrating. One reads about these supposed cures and wonders how they can pass the information on to loved ones who are suffering. How do you convince a a conservative in his late 60s that cannabis oil may potentially be good for use as treatment? After all it may all be conspiracy nonsense and false hope.

It leads to frustration.

I imagine if a company had the cure someone/staff would leak it.



posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 07:07 AM
link   
a reply to: peterp

I hope this answers your question or at the very least gives you a general idea...

Cancer Act of 1939 - Prohibits Advertising Treatment or Cure of Cancer
Cancer Act of 1939 - Prohibits...

Love,



posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 08:39 AM
link   
a reply to: SirKonstantin

Bloody Norah, that IS an interesting reply.

The fact that there have been 24 convictions since '84 means this means something too.



posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 08:51 AM
link   
a reply to: SirKonstantin

It's to stop the insidious snake oil salespeople who prey on the sick and vulnerable. It's rarely enforced, but if you try and con people with little hope out of their money then you deserve to feel the full force of the law.



posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 09:41 AM
link   
Allow me to add one.Back in the 70s I had a Biology teacher (yes a real teacher not the ones they have today) that served as the right hand of the Surgeon Generals of the time until retirement and becoming a teacher. One day , she came in and wrote this extremely long chemical name on the blackboard . She asks the question, can anyone tell me what this is ? everyone in class was dumbfounded . It is a cure for cancer developed by some French doctors , It has a very high success rate,

Cancer cure known for 35 years?

Mods please remove if not acceptable

Seems that the French researchers had taken and worked with Dr. Burzynski’s early research . It was completely shut down and shut out by the various acronyms around the world.



posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 09:46 AM
link   
a reply to: Gothmog

Cancer isn't a single disease. Burzynski is a fraud who preys on the sick and terminally ill. You should be ashamed to be bringing up his name.



posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 09:55 AM
link   

originally posted by: ManFromEurope
Dear peterp:

Why should Big Pharma do this? What would they win?
More money? I doubt that.


ROLMFAO!!! Thanks for that.



posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 10:07 AM
link   

originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: Gothmog

Cancer isn't a single disease. Burzynski is a fraud who preys on the sick and terminally ill. You should be ashamed to be bringing up his name.


Yes you should be ashamed.
Only state licensed MD's are allowed to describe this malfunction called cancer and prescribe the appropriate poison in response. The FDA determines what is legal for the treatment of cancer. The FDA is the authority. There is no conflict of interest to see here. No PR. No kick backs. No fraud. No greed. No mass murder. Just pure scientism.

Please return to your regularly scheduled state of quiescent helplessness. The Dr will be with you in a moment.



posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 12:10 PM
link   
It's only a conspiracy if there is little chance it is happening. What is being said in the OP is fact. There are a lot of people deriving income from cancer and to find a way to cure it or stop it from happening will be discounted right away. They prefer to keep the money rolling in, the Medical industry is too high of a percentage of our GNP to start finding ways to cure things.

They know what causes cancer, it is not what we are told it is. In fact some of the things they call carcinogens are not even a problem to us if we consume the companion food chemistry when we eat them.

There are a lot of food chemistries in our western diet that can cause problems.
edit on 9-9-2015 by rickymouse because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 12:31 PM
link   
a reply to: InverseLookingGlass

You're welcome to advertise whatever you want if you perform the necessary clinical trials and come up with a safe and effective treatment. Otherwise, jog on, son.




top topics



 
5
<<   2 >>

log in

join