It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Where did this lady push her religion on anyone? It was her PERSONAL beliefs. But yet you avoid the question with rhetoric and mantra. You cant answer , can you? Because it didnt happen.
originally posted by: AboveBoard
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Flatfish
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: IAMTAT
Funny how no other democrat or anyone on the left is supporting here huh?
She is also a new found Christian, are we sure she has not found a new political stance?
Funny , I noticed that too. Perhaps you cannot be a Democrat if you are Christian.I wonder how they feel about Muslims.
Most Democrats I know don't give a rat's ass what religion someone else identifies with so long as they're not pushing their beliefs on others.
On the other hand, most Democrats I know don't support religious zealotry in any form.
Hence, the lack of Democrats supporting Davis or Huchabee.
Hmm , pray tell where she "pushed her religion on others" ? As far as I know , she refused to provide marriage certificates for same sex couples due to her PERSONAL beliefs. She did not "push her religion on anyone" Another very lame argument. And how was this religious zealotry??? That is hilarious.......
Ahh the mindset of your party that was long ago the Democratic Party.Now is the Progressive Liberal party. The last true Democrat passed with Teddy
Sigh. Refusing to do her job and provide marriage licenses due to her PERSONAL beliefs = not upholding her oath to do her job = Judge got involved and she was found in contempt of court when ordered to do her job = jail time = NOT RELIGIOUS PERSECUTION.
How many threads have we seen of, say, a Stewardess who for her religious beliefs, complains that she is expected to serve alcohol on the plane? She happens to be Muslim, and devout. At least in the Stewardess's case, she is NOT infringing on the law of the land, nor on the civil rights of others by not wanting to serve them alcohol.
Not trying to derail here, just giving some perspective...
Separation of Church and State applies here - she cannot choose to enforce her religious ideas on the rest of the County.
- AB
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Flatfish
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Flatfish
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: IAMTAT
Funny how no other democrat or anyone on the left is supporting here huh?
She is also a new found Christian, are we sure she has not found a new political stance?
Funny , I noticed that too. Perhaps you cannot be a Democrat if you are Christian.I wonder how they feel about Muslims.
Most Democrats I know don't give a rat's ass what religion someone else identifies with so long as they're not pushing their beliefs on others.
On the other hand, most Democrats I know don't support religious zealotry in any form.
Hence, the lack of Democrats supporting Davis or Huchabee.
Hmm , pray tell where she "pushed her religion on others" ? As far as I know , she refused to provide marriage certificates for same sex couples due to her PERSONAL beliefs. She did not "push her religion on anyone" Another very lame argument. And how was this religious zealotry??? That is hilarious.......
Ahh the mindset of your party that was long ago the Democratic Party.Now is the Progressive Liberal party. The last true Democrat passed with Teddy
That's exactly what she's doing and it would be hilarious that you can't see it, if it weren't so pathetic.
Democrat, Liberal, Progressive, call us whatever pleases you the most because it's our mindset that binds us, not the label.
Where did this lady push her religion on anyone? It was her PERSONAL beliefs. But yet you avoid the question with rhetoric and mantra. You cant answer , can you? Because it didnt happen.
Btw , who is the pathetic one? I will take you off the list when you answer the question.
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Flatfish
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Flatfish
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: IAMTAT
Funny how no other democrat or anyone on the left is supporting here huh?
She is also a new found Christian, are we sure she has not found a new political stance?
Funny , I noticed that too. Perhaps you cannot be a Democrat if you are Christian.I wonder how they feel about Muslims.
Most Democrats I know don't give a rat's ass what religion someone else identifies with so long as they're not pushing their beliefs on others.
On the other hand, most Democrats I know don't support religious zealotry in any form.
Hence, the lack of Democrats supporting Davis or Huchabee.
Hmm , pray tell where she "pushed her religion on others" ? As far as I know , she refused to provide marriage certificates for same sex couples due to her PERSONAL beliefs. She did not "push her religion on anyone" Another very lame argument. And how was this religious zealotry??? That is hilarious.......
Ahh the mindset of your party that was long ago the Democratic Party.Now is the Progressive Liberal party. The last true Democrat passed with Teddy
That's exactly what she's doing and it would be hilarious that you can't see it, if it weren't so pathetic.
Democrat, Liberal, Progressive, call us whatever pleases you the most because it's our mindset that binds us, not the label.
Where did this lady push her religion on anyone? It was her PERSONAL beliefs. But yet you avoid the question with rhetoric and mantra. You cant answer , can you? Because it didnt happen.
Hmm , pray tell where she "pushed her religion on others" ? As far as I know , she refused to provide marriage certificates for same sex couples due to her PERSONAL beliefs. She did not "push her religion on anyone" Another very lame argument. And how was this religious zealotry??? That is hilarious.......
Ahh the mindset of your party that was long ago the Democratic Party.Now is the Progressive Liberal party. The last true Democrat passed with Teddy
She said HERSELF that it's a religious tenet she intends to follow now that she's 'found Jesus.'
originally posted by: UnBreakable
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Flatfish
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Flatfish
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: IAMTAT
Funny how no other democrat or anyone on the left is supporting here huh?
She is also a new found Christian, are we sure she has not found a new political stance?
Funny , I noticed that too. Perhaps you cannot be a Democrat if you are Christian.I wonder how they feel about Muslims.
Most Democrats I know don't give a rat's ass what religion someone else identifies with so long as they're not pushing their beliefs on others.
On the other hand, most Democrats I know don't support religious zealotry in any form.
Hence, the lack of Democrats supporting Davis or Huchabee.
Hmm , pray tell where she "pushed her religion on others" ? As far as I know , she refused to provide marriage certificates for same sex couples due to her PERSONAL beliefs. She did not "push her religion on anyone" Another very lame argument. And how was this religious zealotry??? That is hilarious.......
Ahh the mindset of your party that was long ago the Democratic Party.Now is the Progressive Liberal party. The last true Democrat passed with Teddy
That's exactly what she's doing and it would be hilarious that you can't see it, if it weren't so pathetic.
Democrat, Liberal, Progressive, call us whatever pleases you the most because it's our mindset that binds us, not the label.
Where did this lady push her religion on anyone? It was her PERSONAL beliefs. But yet you avoid the question with rhetoric and mantra. You cant answer , can you? Because it didnt happen.
Btw , who is the pathetic one? I will take you off the list when you answer the question.
"Davis has asked to be excused from issuing marriage licenses to anyone on the grounds that licensing a same-sex marriage would violate her religious beliefs".
www.washingtonpost.com... icenses/
originally posted by: Flatfish
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Flatfish
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Flatfish
originally posted by: Gothmog
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: IAMTAT
Funny how no other democrat or anyone on the left is supporting here huh?
She is also a new found Christian, are we sure she has not found a new political stance?
Funny , I noticed that too. Perhaps you cannot be a Democrat if you are Christian.I wonder how they feel about Muslims.
Most Democrats I know don't give a rat's ass what religion someone else identifies with so long as they're not pushing their beliefs on others.
On the other hand, most Democrats I know don't support religious zealotry in any form.
Hence, the lack of Democrats supporting Davis or Huchabee.
Hmm , pray tell where she "pushed her religion on others" ? As far as I know , she refused to provide marriage certificates for same sex couples due to her PERSONAL beliefs. She did not "push her religion on anyone" Another very lame argument. And how was this religious zealotry??? That is hilarious.......
Ahh the mindset of your party that was long ago the Democratic Party.Now is the Progressive Liberal party. The last true Democrat passed with Teddy
That's exactly what she's doing and it would be hilarious that you can't see it, if it weren't so pathetic.
Democrat, Liberal, Progressive, call us whatever pleases you the most because it's our mindset that binds us, not the label.
Where did this lady push her religion on anyone? It was her PERSONAL beliefs. But yet you avoid the question with rhetoric and mantra. You cant answer , can you? Because it didnt happen.
You're all about labels, aren't you?
In this particular instance, her "PERSONAL" beliefs equate to her RELIGIOUS beliefs.
She said as much herself, repeatedly! Hell she thinks she's doing this for God and that he's the one who got her out of jail.
Give me a break!
a reply to: theantediluvian
You're going further out of your way to make unreasonable excuses for her actions than she herself is. What's it going to take for you to concede the obvious?
I have felt the sting of "you are going to hell" from a certain kind of Christian
originally posted by: theantediluvian
An empty offer if ever there was one. He may as well have offered himself up to be launched into the Sun.
originally posted by: Gothmog
Definition of marriage is state law.