It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Debunking Some Infowars BS

page: 3
32
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 8 2015 @ 02:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: AttitudeProblem
a reply to: theantediluvian
you havn't proved jack, you took one word out of the title of that Youtube video to try too discredit infowars, thereby exposing your own nefarious agenda. the article was about Muslim “refugees” not ISIS and the pivotal point shown in the video still holds true,, Muslims yelling "death too the Infidels" in France...


...in 2011 (or maybe even 2010).




posted on Sep, 8 2015 @ 02:20 PM
link   
a reply to: theantediluvian

I vehemently despise Alex and his organization. The only people who buy his BS is mainly (gullible) Christians!
edit on 8-9-2015 by mekhanics because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 8 2015 @ 02:29 PM
link   
a reply to: Krazysh0t

And after stating " Meanwhile, Huffington Post may get facts wrong here and there and has a liberal slant to their presentation" then defending HuffPo makes you look ridiculous. HuffPo is nothing more than expanded Common Dreams "light". And Common Dreams is nothing more than Mother Jones light.

BTW, I don't agree with banning any of them; the more information the better, but it does need to be vetted.



posted on Sep, 8 2015 @ 02:52 PM
link   
a reply to: TonyS

But that's the thing, Huff Po isn't even CLOSE to the same level of misinformation as Infowars. Infowars actively seeks to disinform. Huff Po may do it because they have a bad journalist with loose guidelines for vetting sources or because they made a mistake, but they clearly don't do it all the time. Therefore it is dishonest to say they are on par with Huff Po in disinformation tactics.

Regardless if you want infowars or Huff Po banned, they are NOT the same content wise. If anything, Inforwars is a MUCH better candidate to be banned as a source here than Huff Po. Though I'd ban WND first, but whatever.



posted on Sep, 8 2015 @ 02:52 PM
link   
Closed for staff review.

Terms and Conditions of Use--Please Review

This thread will remain closed.
ATS has nothing positive to gain from allowing members to bash other conspiracy sites.
Also, ATS does not allow spinoffs of threads.
edit on Wed Sep 9 2015 by DontTreadOnMe because: (no reason given)




top topics
 
32
<< 1  2   >>

log in

join