It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

EXCLUSIVE: First picture 'proof' Russian troops all over Syria

page: 2
10
<< 1   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 8 2015 @ 11:48 PM
link   
Hopefully the ISIS will be destroyed and Syrian lands will once again be safe for Christians and minorities. If the west won't or can't defeat the ISIS it's time to try something different. The mass Islamic invasion of Europe no doubt pushed Putin into action. This instability and violence cannot continue, enough is enough. The ISIS cannot be allowed to expand into Europe.




posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 12:44 AM
link   
Still waiting on proof these pics were even taken in Syria. Nice pics of Bashar and Putin mind you.
edit on 9-9-2015 by Soloprotocol because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 12:44 AM
link   
double post.
edit on 9-9-2015 by Soloprotocol because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 12:45 AM
link   
Triple post, WOW!, internet slow today. I'm sure the Daily mail has the answer.
edit on 9-9-2015 by Soloprotocol because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 01:33 AM
link   

originally posted by: Soloprotocol
Still waiting on proof these pics were even taken in Syria. Nice pics of Bashar and Putin mind you.


Yeah, I agree from seeing them earlier -over the weekend. Even then there was questioning on being valid interest of being current photos taken in Syria. After all it's social media sourcing and the bases already exist.



posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 10:52 AM
link   
a reply to: donktheclown

I'd rather see that everyone takes care of their OWN business.

Why would I prefer troops at all?



posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 10:54 AM
link   

originally posted by: blacktie
Red Alert Red Alert

Russia is still communist isnt it?


Yes, as communist as america is a dictatorship.



posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 10:59 AM
link   

originally posted by: intrptr
Russia and Syria are allies.

At least the Russians are supporting the legitimate government.



Exactly
They are allied in defeating Islamic terror. Russia is invited there by the legitimate government to help them them remain a normal secular society battling against terrorism.



posted on Sep, 9 2015 @ 11:12 AM
link   

originally posted by: PutinTheGreat
Hopefully the ISIS will be destroyed and Syrian lands will once again be safe for Christians and minorities. If the west won't or can't defeat the ISIS it's time to try something different. The mass Islamic invasion of Europe no doubt pushed Putin into action. This instability and violence cannot continue, enough is enough. The ISIS cannot be allowed to expand into Europe.


Like this
Thanks heavens some Christian state is going in and attempting to preserve Christians in the Middle East, all the UK and USA have done through the endless wars is accelerate their demise. Good on Russia and Vlad, I love the way he acts decisively unlike the joke EU dithering behind an aimless legs tied by balls and chains Germany.



posted on Sep, 10 2015 @ 03:19 AM
link   

originally posted by: tony9802
Written in the article is the following statement:
"The images do not prove Russians are directly involved in fighting but suggest Putin's troops are on the ground in a number of locations in Syria."


So it's a proof but, it is not a proof ...



A Russian buildup in Syria? The propaganda machine strikes again



Somebody wants the Saudis and their Arab neighbors to believe that Russia is intensifying its presence in Syria. That possibly explains a hysterical propaganda overload this weekend.

They seek them here, they seek them there. According to certain elements of the US media, Russian soldiers are everywhere. At this stage, the moon is probably the only place you are safe. Then again, maybe they are readying copy which 'proves' that the Russians are hiding on the dark side. Or perhaps even they believe that such an accusation would be a bridge too far.

Russian military personnel have always been in Syria. Moscow has a base there. Furthermore, Vladimir Putin has hardly hidden the fact that his government has fulfilled defense contracts with Damascus. That would require trainers on the ground.

So why did Russia’s involvement in Syria suddenly become such massive news? Is it because relations between the Kremlin and Saudi Arabia are rapidly improving? Or maybe it's down to Washington's fears that Moscow may decide to take out ISIS, unilaterally, or with European approval, freezing America out?



posted on Sep, 10 2015 @ 03:25 AM
link   

originally posted by: tony9802
EXCLUSIVE: First picture 'proof' that Russia has troops on the ground all over Syria helping dictator Bashar Al-Assad - and they've been there since APRIL


Helping the dictator fight against the radical terrorist group ISIS who gassed a number of civilians last year and tried to convince the US that it was Assad who did it? The same ISIS the US is *allegedly* fighting around the globe? The same ISIS that the USA happily outfitted and armed when America's idiots-in-charge visited them in Syria for photo ops and rah-rah speeches against Assad because he had not kissed the House of Saud's ring recently enough?

Wait, why is Assad the bad guy, again?
edit on 10-9-2015 by burdman30ott6 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 10 2015 @ 03:33 AM
link   
a reply to: burdman30ott6




Wait, why is Assad the bad guy, again?


because he does not fetch and roll over when told. Oh yeah...he's a dictator also. Dictator = bad boy.



posted on Sep, 10 2015 @ 03:45 AM
link   
a reply to: burdman30ott6




Wait, why is Assad the bad guy, again?


Hmmm for a start there is this .



In his foreign policy, Assad is an outspoken critic of the United States, Israel, Saudi Arabia, and Turkey.[56] Until he became president, Assad was not greatly involved in politics; his only public role was head of the Syrian Computer Society, which introduced the Internet to Syria in 2001. Al-Assad was confirmed as president by an unopposed referendum in 2000. He was expected to take a more liberal approach than his father.



posted on Sep, 10 2015 @ 03:48 AM
link   
a reply to: hutch622

What part makes him bad?



new topics

top topics



 
10
<< 1   >>

log in

join