Muslim Flight Attendant Files Complaint Because Airline Expects Her To Serve Drinks To Passengers

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Whenever you force anything you will get outrage.

Ok. Where's the force?

Courts have forced gay marriage despite many against it.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Courts have forced gay marriage despite many against it.

The Muslim flight attendant hasn't been forced to serve alcohol.
Kim Davis hasn't been forced to issue marriage licenses.

a reply to: Spider879

This is getting ridiculous.

The sooner we stop bending over backwards for bat# crazy Muslims the better.

This goes for any religions not just Muslims. They're all way off base and to our detriment.

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Courts have forced gay marriage despite many against it.

The Muslim flight attendant hasn't been forced to serve alcohol.
Kim Davis hasn't been forced to issue marriage licenses.

Which has what to do with gay marriage being forced on people by the courts?

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Sorry can you rephrase your question?

What right does this women think she has to ram her religious prejudices down other people of different faiths throat.

This is typical of what quietly bothers me with allowing so many muslims into europe - albeit muslims in my family all drink in any case. But its the thin edge of there wedge. How many people just intend to create mini muslim states within other countries and then use the law to force this issue?

Personally I hope she gets shown the door for taking a job she clearly knew she wouldn't carry out. I wonder if some idiot cleric is behind her in the background wanting to stop integration?

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

The majority support same sex marriage and nobody has been forced to do anything. If you don't want a same sex marriage, you are quite safe.

I don't care for Miracle Whip on my sandwiches but the fact that others happen to prefer it in no way shape or form prevents me from not eating Miracle Whip. I can enjoy my mayonnaise and mustard in peace.

Well, unless my ego is such that I feel that because I like mayo then, by God, everyone else will too.

That's called tyranny.

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Sorry can you rephrase your question?

The outrage has to do with something being forced on the general population, not the person in question. The general population can identify with them, thus outrage.

I'll admit I might have slightly gone off the topic (even though this thread popped up because of Kim Davis - it came from twitter) but I was just simply making an observation.

Carry on.

originally posted by: Hefficide
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

The majority support same sex marriage and nobody has been forced to do anything. If you don't want a same sex marriage, you are quite safe.

I don't care for Miracle Whip on my sandwiches but the fact that others happen to prefer it in no way shape or form prevents me from not eating Miracle Whip. I can enjoy my mayonnaise and mustard in peace.

Well, unless my ego is such that I feel that because I like mayo then, by God, everyone else will too.

That's called tyranny.

Perception is reality. Same sex marriage was unable to pass by popular vote, so courts overturned popular votes. That will garner outrage.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

The general population can identify with them, thus outrage.

Yep them being mostly Christians. When something similar happens it falls on deaf ears.

Even Muslims do not protest what happened to that Muslim flight attendant because they know to follow the laws and rules of this country.

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

The general population can identify with them, thus outrage.

Yep them being mostly Christians. When something similar happens it falls on deaf ears.

Even Muslims do not protest what happened to that Muslim flight attendant because they know to follow the laws and rules of this country.

No because she's in the wrong and should not be near alcohol to begin with. They think her position is wrong, and nothing is being forced on them.

Gee I took this job knowing my job requirements.....now that I have it I want an out on certain things.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
Courts have forced gay marriage despite many against it.

Courts have forced people to pay income tax despite many being against it....

Courts have stopped people lynching blacks, despite many being against them stopping it...

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

They think her position is wrong, and nothing is being forced on them.

Uh-huh now you are getting it. Now you see my observation?

originally posted by: hellobruce

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
Courts have forced gay marriage despite many against it.

Courts have forced people to pay income tax despite many being against it....

Courts have stopped people lynching blacks, despite many being against them stopping it...

Courts forced liberals to let blacks go to their schools. Guess what, they RAGED against it.

Boston, MA

Protests and violence[edit]
ROAR[edit]
Main article: Restore Our Alienated Rights
Restore Our Alienated Rights (ROAR) was an anti-desegregation busing organization formed in Boston, Massachusetts by Boston School Committee chairwoman Louise Day Hicks in 1974. Using tactics modeled on the civil rights movement, ROAR activists led marches in Charlestown and South Boston, public prayers, sit-ins of school buildings and government offices, protests at the homes of prominent Bostonians, mock funerals, and even a small march on Washington DC. By 1976, with the failure to block implementation of the busing plan, the organization declined.[3]

Violence[edit]
There were a number of protest incidents that turned severely violent, even resulting in deaths. In one case, Attorney Theodore Landsmark was attacked and bloodied by a group of white teenagers as he exited Boston City Hall.[9] One of the youths, Joseph Rakes, attacked Landsmark with an American flag.[10] According to Landsmark, Rakes was swinging the flag and trying to hit him, not trying to spear him as it appears in the photo, and he narrowly missed.[11] A photograph of the attack on Landsmark, The Soiling of Old Glory taken by Stanley Forman for the Boston Herald American, won the Pulitzer Prize for Spot News Photography (now the Pulitzer Prize for Breaking News Photography) in 1977.[12][13] In a retaliatory incident the next day, black teenagers in Roxbury threw rocks at a white man's car and caused him to crash.[6] The youths dragged him out and crushed his skull with nearby paving stones. When police arrived, the man was surrounded by a crowd of 100 chanting "Let him die" while lying in a coma from which he never recovered.[6]

In another instance, a white teenager was stabbed nearly to death by a black teenager at South Boston High School. The community's white residents mobbed the school, trapping the black students inside.[14] There were dozens of other racial incidents at South Boston High that year, predominantly of racial taunting of the black students.[6] The school was forced to close for a month after the stabbing.[6] When it opened again, it was one of the first high schools to install metal detectors; with 400 students attending, it was guarded by 500 police officers every day.[6] In December 1975, Judge Garrity turned out the principal of South Boston High and took control himself.[6]

Judge Garrity increased the plan down to first grade for the following school year.[6] In October 1975, 6,000 marched against the busing in South Boston.[6]

en.wikipedia.org...


When courts force things on people they typically do not react well.

a reply to: Deaf Alien

No, I still see mine, which is that these two cases are really completely different.

If she realize that drinking or serving drinks is haram (forbidden) then she should realize that travelling unescorted in public without a male chaperone from one's immediate family is also haram and thus she should quit her job and do internet sales from home, btw the jobs market in the states must be improving a heckova lot if folks can muck around with their jobs like that, and sadly Iam sure like the Kim Davis lady she won out over someone else who could have used that job.

a reply to: OccamsRazor04

No, I still see mine, which is that these two cases are really completely different.

There's no difference. Both cases do not involve force.

Ok I think we are going off the topic (my fault I'm sorry even though this thread popped up because of all that Kim Davis crap) so we can discuss this further in that other thread.

originally posted by: OccamsRazor04

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: OccamsRazor04

Whenever you force anything you will get outrage.

Ok. Where's the force?

Courts have forced gay marriage despite many against it.

Wow, they're forcing people to marry each other? Same sex couples? Why would they force two same sex people to get married against their will? That seems horrid.

Why have I not heard of this? I have heard that they have allowed same sex couples to marry, the same as heterosexual couples. but I had no idea they were forcing people to do this.

Sickening.

I am outraged.