It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: BuzzyWigs
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
Aww damn. Sorry. Didn't mean to be mean.
originally posted by: zazzafrazz
I heard this morning on the news the governor is holding a special session to define Kim Davies role duties.
originally posted by: zazzafrazz
a reply to: Benevolent Heretic
I just looked online and couldn't find it either. My husband and I both heard the same thing as we looked at each other and started discussing how much unnecessary work and cost this woman has created for her state.
I think people would be shocked when the total cost came out. I doubt she would be reelected after people see it.
"Regardless of whatever their personal feelings might be, the overwhelming majority of county clerks are following the law and carrying out their duty to issue marriage licenses regardless of gender, and the courts will deal appropriately with the two or three clerks who are acting otherwise." Beshear said his administration is continuing to identify state statutes that must now be interpreted in a different way and is making the appropriate changes. Read more here: www.kentucky.com...=cpy
It's time for everyone to take a deep breath," Beshear said. "There is no need to spend $60,000 a day of taxpayers' dollars calling a special session of the General Assembly, and therefore I will not be calling a special session on this topic. "If there are any minor changes needed to clarify the language of statutes, any such changes can be made in the 2016 legislative session in January," he said. Read more here: www.kentucky.com...=cpy
Amid the flurry of commentary by the mainstream and LGBT media on the “meaning” of Davis’ disputed meeting with Pope Francis during his trip to the United States, the Vatican issued a statement describing Davis’ so-called private audience with the pope to be nothing but a handshake in a reception line.
...
Within hours of the Vatican statement, Davis’ law firm fired back accusing the Vatican of misrepresenting the nature and extent of the meeting and wholly denied that Davis met the Pontiff as one of many people in a reception line.
...
To dispute the Vatican’s version of the meeting, Davis’ law firm posted pics that purport to show Davis and her fourth husband in the Vatican embassy in Washington where the meeting purportedly occurred. None of the photos has Davis and the pope in the same frame.
originally posted by: Darth_Prime
i mean why else would Gays be on Above Top Secret
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Darth_Prime
Hey, pal. I thought you were supposed to be out promoting your agenda or something, not ripping on poor Saint Kimmy.