It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: greencmp
You know you could probably even do away with the permit if at the time of purchase you could prove you know what you're doing before they'd sell to you. It would shift some liability over to the gun shop owner and make it his duty to verify, even just personally between him and the buyer, that they were capable and understood what is needed. Which is really what any responsible seller should be doing anyway.
My buddy has a gun shop and he throws people out of there all the time if he feels unsure for any reason about selling a gun to someone. He has to deal with the FBI and stuff already anyway so the Gov. could easily verify the sellers are on the level and doing what they need to do.
Registering however is still important because if a gun is used in a crime it helps to be able to track it's ownership and so forth. But that is data, like you say, that needs to be safe and secure and not used for shady stuff. Unfortunately the Gov. is neither safe or secure and are almost always up to something shady.
originally posted by: Mugly
a reply to: DAVID64
bats and knives are a bit more personal though.
big difference.
i know the end result is the person is dead but shooting someone from x feet away is much different that being up close and beating them to death.
originally posted by: greencmp
You are beginning this intellectual experiment with a false premise though, that those who wish to exercise their 2nd amendment rights are subject to suspicion of being a criminal or a psychotic.
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: greencmp
How is it unconstitutional when nobody is stopping you from keeping it and using it???
You can't guns everywhere like we do and not at least track them to some degree. Let's be real. We're not talking about toasters. We track our pets and our deliveries better. Just having to register the owner isn't asking much.
originally posted by: greencmp
No, by that logic, why should you have the benefit of any amendment?
Why let you be secure in your person, house, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures?
originally posted by: mOjOm
originally posted by: greencmp
No, by that logic, why should you have the benefit of any amendment?
Why let you be secure in your person, house, papers, and effects against unreasonable searches and seizures?
Well, it says that you can keep and bear arms. They aren't infringing on anyone doing that by having them register them.
It's the same reasoning we have for tracking the whereabouts of lots of stuff like explosives, medical supplies, or even the new issue of guns and ammo you have coming in the mail. Some things are important so you need to know where they are.
originally posted by: greencmp
There are no qualifications to the second amendment.
In fact, there is nothing in it that limits the right to bear arms to guns at all.
I entirely dismiss the idea that the state (I presume that's what you meant when you said "you") must be aware of the whereabouts of all tools that could be used for nefarious purposes.
originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: infolurker
What is the purpose of the waiting period?
It's what they call a "cooling down period". It keeps people from flying off the handle, buying a gun and doing something stupid.
originally posted by: truthseeker84
Apparently, there are certain hand guns are are made recent years that didn't have one of a safety feature or whatever stupid # they came up with at the time, so basically any hand gun failing to meet that criteria, is not allowed to be sold in California. So there are a lot of hand guns that I wanted to buy but wasn't allowed to.
Funny thing is, in California, you could still go apply for a permit to own a FULL AUTOMATIC assault rifle.
Anyway, it's pretty messed up.
originally posted by: vor78
Its just my opinion, but it seems to me that if a person can pass the background check, then there's no justification for a waiting period. Are they guilty of anything? No, so why treat them as if they are or will be. Last I checked, our legal system wasn't based on a presumption of guilt.
Well, except on one issue, apparently.
originally posted by: Kapusta
Also for any type of high powered rifle like an AR-15 etc . they now have what's called a "bullet button" meaning you can no longer drop a magazine buy simply pushing the button .you need a slim instrument or an actual bullet to relese the mag.
I really think all these things are set in place for the purpose of generating $$$$ it's all a racket.
🎩
👀
originally posted by: ANNED
originally posted by: Kapusta
Also for any type of high powered rifle like an AR-15 etc . they now have what's called a "bullet button" meaning you can no longer drop a magazine buy simply pushing the button .you need a slim instrument or an actual bullet to relese the mag.
I really think all these things are set in place for the purpose of generating $$$$ it's all a racket.
🎩
👀
The joke on Calif is going to Nevada gun shows and seeing tables with non Calif AR magazine release buttons so the people from Calif can buy them no questions asked.
It takes about 5 mins to change a Calif AR bullet button to a non compliant non Calif AR.
I know many people that have bought the conversion an have them stored away just in case.
originally posted by: ANNED
originally posted by: truthseeker84
Apparently, there are certain hand guns are are made recent years that didn't have one of a safety feature or whatever stupid # they came up with at the time, so basically any hand gun failing to meet that criteria, is not allowed to be sold in California. So there are a lot of hand guns that I wanted to buy but wasn't allowed to.
Funny thing is, in California, you could still go apply for a permit to own a FULL AUTOMATIC assault rifle.
Anyway, it's pretty messed up.
With handguns its not the safety feature its if the manufacture pays $5000 per gun make and modal.
A manufacture selling new guns has to have every handgun make and modal tested.
If the manufacture sells two modal 1911s one in chrome and one blued its going to cost $10,000 TO GET THEM APPROVED.
and if the gun is modified to a Competition Match gun before sale its $5000 per change.
As for full auto weapons unless you own a movie prop gun company for the movies or TV shows you WILL NOT get a permit for full auto weapons. There are no other exclusions