Breaking: 150 more Clinton Emails Have Classified Info.

a reply to: Philippines

Wow, an email deemed classified because of a public newspaper discussing drones. How does that make sense?

Read the sources I provided. The government classifies the most ridiculous things. That's why I think it's funny to watch the nutbags dance around the fire over this issue. What is considered classified could be the most trivial of things.

originally posted by: russ212
You have proven absolutely nothing except you are a corruption apologists.

a reply to: introvert

Sure. If it makes you feel better. I feel better knowing that you came to this discussion knowing very little and are not trying to sit on top your high horse.

Careful you don't fall.

www.politifact.com...

www.nationalreview.com...


www.usatoday.com...

www.npr.org...

Read the above links. Very educational.

originally posted by: russ212
www.politifact.com...

www.nationalreview.com...


www.usatoday.com...

www.npr.org...

Read the above links. Very educational.

Thanks for sharing those links, Russ.

Nothing 'classified' here...move along.

Clinton emails contained spy satellite data on North Korean nukes

www.washingtontimes.com...

News....

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch announced it filed a lawsuit seeking access to two of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails in their original, native format (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-01414)). The native format contains metadata, which provides details such as server information and hidden email recipients.

In May 2015, the State Department posted to its website several emails alleged returned by Clinton to the State Department late last year. In July, Judicial Watch submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request asking for email “as it was sent” for two of the emails – one by Clinton aide Huma Abedin on Sunday, August 21, 2011, from her [email protected] email address, and the other email “as it was received” by Jacob Sullivan on Saturday, July 7, 2012, at his [email protected] email address. Alternatively, if the State Department could not produce the emails in their native format, Judicial Watch requested that the agency produce records that would identify the information contained in the email headers.

Judicial Watch Files Lawsuit for Clinton Email Metadata

Hot Dawg !!

Another B-U-R-N-E-R !!! ....


Hillary Suggests Clinton Foundation $$$ To Cheryl Mills’ Domestic Partner For Haiti Project

Less than a week after the devastating earthquake in Haiti on January 12, 2010, the Secretary of State — in charge of America’s response to the devastating earthquakes in Haiti — requested a proposal from her Chief of Staff, Cheryl Mills about teacher training in Haiti.

Mills dutifully forwarded a multi-million dollar proposal for rebuilding schools in Port-Au-Prince along with developing and training a “Teachers Corps” with 500 American teachers in Haiti. And guess who the proposal came from? David Domenici, Mills’ husband and the father of her two children. The email gives no indication of any relationship between Mills and Domenici, but his online bio confirms it.

In a January 18, 2010 email, Mills noted; “…here are the ideas for the Haiti Education Corps that you asked for.”

The following day, Hillary wrote back:

“Great idea. No surprise. Let’s work toward solid proposal maybe to Red Cross and Clinton Foundation since they have unencumbered $.”

and ...

Emails show how aides crafted Clinton’s public image

Staffer who worked on Clinton’s private e-mail server faces subpoena

A former State Department staffer who worked on Hillary Rodham Clinton’s private e-mail server tried this week to fend off a subpoena to testify before Congress, saying he would assert his constitutional right not to answer questions to avoid incriminating himself.

The move by Bryan Pagliano, who had worked on Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign before setting up the server in her New York home in 2009, came in a Monday letter from his lawyer to the House panel investigating the 2012 attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi, Libya.

new meaning to "5th Column"

a reply to: xuenchen


So..on a regular basis, Hillary was using State Department Employees
to feed her info that would help the Clinton Crime Foundation, and
putting her underlings at risk with Conflict of Interest deals, all
so she could keep fingers in and benefit from.

Clinton = Corruption Knows No Bounds!

Oh...oh this reminds me of the news that part of the
Charity funds donated by Bill and Hill were actually
to themselves!

Yep...Bill and Hill...they donated to the Clinton Crime
Foundation and called it "Charity".

a reply to: burntheships

The past actions of a person usually dictate the adult person that it will become.

Hillary at age 27.

The 27-year-old Clinton was fired from the staff of the House Judiciary committee investigating the Watergate scandal in 1974. She was fired by her supervisor, lifelong Democrat Jerry Zeifman, who called her a liar and much worse.

"She was an unethical, dishonest lawyer," he said. "She conspired to violate the Constitution, the rules of the House, the rules of the committee and the rules of confidentiality."

Zeifman also refused to give Clinton a letter of recommendation, making her one of only three employees he snubbed during his 17-year career.

www.wnd.com...

She never redeemed herself, she has not changed much.

She just got more experience been unethical, dishonest and she still a liar.

a reply to: marg6043

You are on the spot with that,
At this point, she is locked into that life she chose as a
hypocrite extraordinaire; a political criminal on par
with worst in history.

And...if I may say so, she is The War on Women.
Not to mention the Letch she is "married" to.

a reply to: burntheships

I believe that the only reason Bill stayed with her is because she probably blackmailed him as she was eyeing the white house for herself.

a reply to: marg6043

I agree. Imagine all of his dirty laundry tossed
out onto the White House lawn.

He knew better than to let that happen.
Maybe Vince Foster was just a warning to Bill.

Deadly pathetic couple of people they are.

UH-OH...Hillary's server guy is about to plead the 5th!
Not good news for Hillary....

Clinton Ex-Aide Is Likely To Invoke 5th Amendment in Response to Congressional Questions Over Private Email Server

A former aide to Hillary Rodham Clinton who helped set up the server that housed Mrs. Clinton’s private email account plans to invoke his Fifth Amendment right in response to congressional questions about the email practices, according to two people who have been briefed on the matter.

The former aide, Bryan Pagliano, was subpoenaed to testify before a House committee, but a lawyer for Mr. Pagliano has told the panel that Mr. Pagliano will decline to answer their questions and will assert his Fifth Amendment right.

The subpoena was issued by the House committee investigating the 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya. As part of its inquiry, the panel is examining Mrs. Clinton’s use of a private email account while she was secretary of state, which shielded her correspondences from congressional inquiries.

Mr. Pagliano was the information technology director for Mrs. Clinton’s 2008 presidential campaign and then worked at the State Department as an adviser and special projects manager for its chief technology officer, according to his LinkedIn page. He left the State Department in February 2013, the same month Mrs. Clinton stepped down as secretary of state.

It is not clear why Mr. Pagliano is refusing to answer questions about the server. The F.B.I. is investigating how classified information was handled in connection with the account, but no evidence has surfaced that Mr. Pagliano had anything to do with those materials.

Mr. Pagliano’s lawyer, Mark MacDougall, declined to comment.

www.nytimes.com... te-email-server/

a reply to: IAMTAT

I will not be surprised if they find the aid death in some park after committing Suicide, like the Clintons "Friend Vince Foster"

a reply to: IAMTAT

All these "new names" keep seeping out of the woodwork.

There could be thousands involved with this.



[email protected]

a reply to: IAMTAT

Lets see if this guy is more intelligent than Lois Learner when it comes to how to correctly invoke your 5th amendment rights - Don't give an opening statement and then try to invoke - It doesn't work that way.


Secondly has anyone seen the weird back story to the MI-6 guy who was found dead a year or 2 back? he was found packed inside his duffle bag in his shower? I saw an update that the guy had accessed information about the Clintons shortly before his demise. Voice mails he left for other people were deleted and apparently his apartment was steam cleaned, which is why they never found DNA / finger prints of other people.

Not sure if its related but it makes one wonder, considering the controversy surrounding the deaths of people over the years linked to the Clintons.

originally posted by: introvertA law that is consistently broken and is done so because it provided better reaction time, and the classified system is not any more secure than private correspondence. It's best to understand what you are talking about before you form an opinion, or try to push it on to others. Obviously, you are not informed on the issue.

Talk about not understanding what you are talking about, "the classified system is not any more secure than private correspondence." A classified email system goes through multiple levels of encryption and is on a network that does not even connect to the internet. To even log into a classified system you need to have a special login token that generates a new key code for every login. Granted she wouldn't have been able to have that type setup at her home, but I guarantee she had access to a secure system at the state dept, assuming they have an LA (Limited Area). She took no precautions, just because everyone else does it is no excuse. You keep coming back to the fact that the email were not classified when she sent them and that is only the case because she didn't follow procedure. Before she sent ANYTHING that could possibly be classified it should have gone to a derivative classifier first. Those are the people that review the information and determine it's classification level. It has no official classification till that happens not matter what the correspondence contains. But she could do that or her little private CYA server would have gone away when security took it out of there after seeing she sent classified material on a insecure system.

I'm sure she wasn't hacked...

radaronline.com...