It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Christosterone
My problem with the President renaming our highest peak is on principle and procedural precedent.
On March 11, 1975, Governor Jay S. Hammond of the State of Alaska, in furtherance of a resolution passed by the Alaska State Legislature, formally requested that the Secretary of the Interior direct the United States Board on Geographic Names (Board) to change the name of "Mount McKinley" to "Denali."
...
The requested name change is consistent with the Board's substantive policies and is supported by the State of Alaska. While the Board does have a policy of deferring action when a matter is being considered by Congress, contradictory bills on this issue have been proposed by various members of Congress since the late 1970s. Under 43 U.S.C. §§ 364-364f, the Secretary of the Interior may take action in matters "wherein the Board does not act within a reasonable time."
Action may be taken by the Secretary in any matter wherein the Board does not act within a reasonable time.
originally posted by: Xcalibur254
Funny how all through Obama's time in the White House a certain group of people have complained about states' rights. Now when he gives a state what they have been wanted for years he still gets slammed. I guess the guy just can't win. Besides, why are people making such a big deal over something that doesn't affect them in anyway? Oh that's right. Because Obama did it
originally posted by: Christosterone
a reply to: KyoZero
Maybe this will help clarify my position...know that I only speak for myself and not for the conservative movement in general...
In the 19th century the American Civil War was fought and hard won by the United States of America(colloquially the North)...
Some states continue to identify with the defeated Confederate states of America(colloquially the South)
In Western societies you typically don't get to flaunt your failed regimes....
And generally the losing sides know this and will voluntarily remove vestiges of their failure...
Bavaria, for instance, didn't design a new flag with a small swastika in the corner after WWII.
They lost the war and when you lose you don't get to fly whatever loser flag you formerly identified with...unless the winners give you the ok(Japan and Non-swastika germany specifically)
Generally speaking you don't have to legislate against it. People inherently don't want to identify with the losing side.
Somehow parts of the American South are immune to this humility....so states like South Carolina must be cajoled into removing flags of this failed secession...
And I agree with it....but I don't agree with renaming mountains...
This is a tangential thought used to illustrate how I try to take things on a case-by-case basis.
There is no one-size-fits-all political belief system and it's very unfair to categorize entire groups of people without actually asking them their positions on issues.
originally posted by: AndyMayhew
a reply to: Christosterone
I have always known it as Denali.
But Im British ....
originally posted by: Answer
Denali is a cooler name anyway and McKinley was kind of a dick. He was also pretty much the first US President bought and paid for by the mega-corporations to make sure their interests were protected. Rockefeller, Carnegie, J.P. Morgan, and Vanderbilt owned McKinley.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: AndyMayhew
a reply to: Christosterone
I have always known it as Denali.
But Im British ....
We also have a mountin called lords herefords knob.
Dont think us brits should be telling people how to name mountains
originally posted by: Christosterone
a reply to: jtma508
Do you think the Nepalese and Tibetans wanted to name their mountain Everest?
People that land on the moon trump those who club seals....pun intended
-Christosterone