Cancer Act of 1939 - Prohibits Advertising Treatment or Cure of Cancer, page 2

posted on Sep, 11 2015 @ 07:56 PM

link

a reply to: EternalSolace

If a promising study was published, research groups all over the world would be attempting to replicate it. Fact of the matter is, cancer is an incredibly difficult group of diseases to treat. There's certainly not going to be a silver bullet "cure all". But again, your view is very Americo-centric. The world is more than the FDA.

edit on 11-9-2015 by GetHyped because: (no reason given)

stumason

posted on Sep, 11 2015 @ 08:01 PM

link

a reply to: GetHyped

Indeed - in the UK, you have NHS and Cancer Research UK funding the bulk of the work at public University's.

You are quite right, this suppression nonsense is exactly that and always makes out like the US is the centre of the world but when it comes to medical science, it is far from it.

edit on 11/9/15 by stumason because: (no reason given)

EternalSolace

posted on Sep, 11 2015 @ 08:17 PM

link

a reply to: GetHyped

It didn't even dawn on me that this thread and the act in the OP was based out of the UK. Now I understand where you're coming from. Good call. My entire premise was based on US law and the FDA. You're right, the world is more than the FDA and I thank you for calling my attention to it in this thread.