It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
It seems the gun rights groups are afraid of even having a conversation about better regulations.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
I will admit that I have met some people that really shouldn't be allowed to own a gun. I have always distanced myself from those people.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Grimpachi
I will admit that I have met some people that really shouldn't be allowed to own a gun. I have always distanced myself from those people.
Me too, but it's kind of hard to distance myself at the mall, the grocery store, the library, the gas station, the movie theater, a school, etc., etc. - unless I just refuse to leave my house.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
originally posted by: Grimpachi
I will admit that I have met some people that really shouldn't be allowed to own a gun. I have always distanced myself from those people.
Me too, but it's kind of hard to distance myself at the mall, the grocery store, the library, the gas station, the movie theater, a school, etc., etc. - unless I just refuse to leave my house.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Answer
What I have seen is whenever the issue comes up the gun rights groups try to shut them up ASAP. The mantra used to be "it is too soon to talk about it" after any shooting tragedy.
As far as the father goes with what he is doing, it doesn't bother me. At some point maybe a sensible conversation can be had on the issue, but I don't think it will happen on ATS.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Answer
I know those people are not your typical poster in these threads, but they still pop in and disrupt meaningful debate on the issue.
That is one reason why I said I don't think ATS will be a place that such a conversation will be had.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Answer
Oh I agree that no law is going to stop it. No law would have prevented Adam Lanza from taking his mother's guns. No law stopped James Holmes from getting a gun. No law stopped Jared Loughner from getting a gun. No law stopped this Bryce/Vester guy from getting a gun. There's no law that would stop any of it, because as long as there are guns in existence, people will get a hold of them, somehow, some way. And you are never going to get rid of all the guns - that's just never going to happen.
I don't know what the answer is, other than to have metal detectors at every single public place, and armed guards roaming around at every single public place. That's going to cost the country a pretty penny though, and there's no guarantee that any of the armed guards aren't going to lose it and shoot indiscriminately.
Basically, we're just SKROOD.
originally posted by: Answer
That's why the focus needs to be on the root causes and not the tools used.
originally posted by: TheOneElectric
Ammunition and gun sales...
Crisis actors...
False flags...
All for the green. Guess what? It works every time.
We should all invest in the ammunition and gun market. Maybe then they'll end the nonsense and find new profit avenues once the average joes have caught on.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
a reply to: Answer
Oh I agree that no law is going to stop it. No law would have prevented Adam Lanza from taking his mother's guns. No law stopped James Holmes from getting a gun. No law stopped Jared Loughner from getting a gun. No law stopped this Bryce/Vester guy from getting a gun. There's no law that would stop any of it, because as long as there are guns in existence, people will get a hold of them, somehow, some way. And you are never going to get rid of all the guns - that's just never going to happen.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Subaeruginosa
I find that those laws are too repressive. No thanks, but if it works for you guys then good for you.
Just try to remember the US is far different from Austrailia.