It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

The Nukes Hoax: Have we all been lied to?

page: 4
9
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 26 2015 @ 02:49 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

Well, how could that have been that easy?

First shipping and given the know how and then of course the official story, soviet spies stole it. Can't be hard really making some spies believe they really stolen some very important information, which where already given to the USSR. Of course if the latter is true of course you ain't gonna tell the public.
But this guy who worked at and helped design, nuclear power plants for creating material for making nuclear bombs (& a WWI vet who fought against Japan) found out this material/plutonium and know-how where shipped to Russia..




posted on Aug, 26 2015 @ 03:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Pluginn
Well, how could that have been that easy?


Because the Soviet Union had a relentless and huge spy network.


First shipping and given the know how and then of course the official story, soviet spies stole it. Can't be hard really making some spies believe they really stolen some very important information, which where already given to the USSR.


They had this years before your claims, it is well documented.



posted on Aug, 26 2015 @ 03:16 PM
link   

originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: sycomix

You need over 1,500 pounds of uranium ore to make enough enriched uranium for one bomb, plus a cascade of centrifuges, you are not building one in your garage next to your Craftsmen tool box.



Not making the bomb out of the uranium dude, you said I needed a source to irradiate the cobalt. Poof source.



posted on Aug, 26 2015 @ 03:19 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

ok not really about how to make nukes (although that also may have been given, I don't buy this spy crap with such important matters really), but the material for making Nukes and how to make this with Power Plants (& the designs from Nuclear Power Plants).
edit on 26-8-2015 by Pluginn because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 26 2015 @ 03:20 PM
link   
I should make sense!!! this is ATS !
nuc = nuclear


originally posted by: sycomix

originally posted by: buddha
most of you fall for the oldest lye, the bible!
US fire bombed All Japan citys constantly.
they all look't like they had a nuc dropt on them.
all that fire! the japs Would have burns on them!!!
and you just say hoax...


Ummm What???? You are not making any sense at all...



posted on Aug, 26 2015 @ 03:28 PM
link   
a reply to: Pluginn

The first nuclear reactor was powered up in 1942 and became part of the Manhattan Project.



posted on Aug, 26 2015 @ 03:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: [post=19740293]P3tr4Q[/post

One of the things I remember clearly being told over and over was that the history is written by the winners.


An old canard, oft repeated - by those who what you to think history is wrong.

But the reality is that whilst it may have been true 2,000 years ago, these days history is written by archaeologists and historians from all nations and all backgrounds, irresepective of who won.

The only exception being in some extreme authoritarian nations where only state accepted history is permitted. North Korea, for example.



posted on Aug, 26 2015 @ 03:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: sycomix
Not making the bomb out of the uranium dude, you said I needed a source to irradiate the cobalt. Poof source.


You cannot make a bomb out of only cobalt 60, it is not capable of becoming supercritical.



posted on Aug, 26 2015 @ 03:38 PM
link   
a reply to: Pluginn

See Zaphod's comment above. The Soviets spies got in on the ground floor.



posted on Aug, 26 2015 @ 03:45 PM
link   
a reply to: P3tr4Q

I know I should not say this, but;
I have witnessed "first hand" the detonaton of both U S and "foriegn" nuclear tests.

They are real.



posted on Aug, 26 2015 @ 04:06 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

If the theory is true its only the casing ..according to Dr.Strangelove anyway...


As an American I do NOT want or need a COBALT bomb, because I DON'T need a planet full of hostages.
edit on 26-8-2015 by cavtrooper7 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 26 2015 @ 04:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: cavtrooper7
If the theory is true its only the casing ..according to Dr.Strangelove anyway...


Which is the point I was trying to make. The casing needs to be irradiated for it to have any major affect. You cannot build a nuclear device solely with cobalt 60.



posted on Aug, 26 2015 @ 04:10 PM
link   
a reply to: AugustusMasonicus

My point is I am BEYOND sure nukes aren't the tips of our best spears anymore.
What did someone call them..."Last Use" weaponry.
Teir 1 platform?
Yeah the only reason they AREN'T used is because we don't need them...yet.



posted on Aug, 26 2015 @ 04:11 PM
link   
Hiroshima ... Nagasaki
/



posted on Aug, 26 2015 @ 04:28 PM
link   
Educated idiots created nuclear weapons and nuclear power.
edit on 26-8-2015 by HUMBLEONE because: "Unst!-"- Jose Glunt



posted on Aug, 26 2015 @ 04:38 PM
link   

originally posted by: rigel4
Hiroshima ... Nagasaki
/


Harry Truman- war criminal. He didn't have to bomb them, but he wanted to send a message to the other psycho Stalin. A horrific act unparalleled in human history. Thanks Harry, you JACKA$$!



posted on Aug, 26 2015 @ 06:10 PM
link   




top topics



 
9
<< 1  2  3   >>

log in

join