It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
◦South Korea:
◾SoKo Military
◾47,000 KIA (Encyclopedia Americana)
◾46,812 KIA + 66,436 MIA (Wallechinsky; also Clodfelter, citing Defense Dept.) [=113,248]
◾59,000 (Summers)
◾70,000 (Clodfelter's own est.)
◾100,000 (Leckie)
◾113,248 (COWP)
◾212,500 KIA (Pentagon: ¼ "KWM")
◾225,784 (Nahm93)
◾281,000 (Rummel)
◾281,257 to 400,000 (Lewy - the latter citing the ROK Defense Ministry)
◾415,000 (S&S; Hastings)
◾[MEDIAN: 113,248]
◾SoKo Civilian ◾315,000 (Rummel)
◾244,000 killed and 303,000 missing. (Nahm88)
◾373,500 killed and 387,740 missing (Nahm93)
◾[MEDIAN: 547,000]
◾SoKo Military + Civilian
◾415,004 killed (Leckie; Wallechinsky; Clodfelter, citing Defense Dept. incl. k, exec., dis.)
◾591,285 (Compton's)
◾596,000 (Rummel)
◾600,000 (Dictionary of 20C World History)
◾987,024 (Nahm93)
◾1,300,000 (Britannica)
◾[MEDIAN: 595,000]
◦North Korea:
◾NoKo Military
◾130,000 KIA (Pentagon: ¼ "KWM")
◾294,151 (Nahm93)
◾214,899 KIA + 101,680 MIA (Wallechinsky; Clodfelter, citing ["highly suspect"] Defense Dept. est.) [=316,579]
◾316,579 (COWP)
◾350,000 (Rummel)
◾520,000 (Small & Singer, FAS)
◾[MEDIAN: 316,579]
◾NoKo Civilian ◾406,000 killed + 680,000 missing (Nahm93)
◾Up to 1,000,000 (Wallechinsky; Clodfelter)
◾1,185,000 (Rummel)
◾[MEDIAN: 1,000,000]
◾NoKo Military + Civilian ◾500,000 (Britannica)
◾700,000 (Dictionary of 20C World History)
◾926,000 (Compton's)
◾1,316,579 (Wallechinsky; Clodfelter)
◾1,380,151 (Nahm93)
◾1,535,000 (Rummel)
◾[MEDIAN: 1,316,579]
◦China
◾110,000 KIA + 35,000 other (FAS citing "Chinese sources")
◾225,000 KIA (Pentagon: ¼ "KWM")
◾401,401 KIA + 21,211 MIA (Wallechinsky; Clodfelter, citing ["highly suspect"] Defense Dept. est.) [= 422,612]
◾422,612 (COWP)
◾500,000 (Rummel)
◾900,000 (Compton's, S&S, FAS)
◾1,000,000 (Britannica)
◾[MEDIAN: ca. 460,000]
◦Combined Chinese and North Korean military dead
◾400,000 (from disease, Wallechinsky; Clodfelter [in addition to KIA est. above])
◾500,000 (from battle, Summers)
◾0.5M (generally, Lewy)
◾1.5M (from all causes, Hastings)
◦US
◾33,000 (Dictionary of 20C World History)
◾33,625 (Nahm93)
◾33,741 battle + 2,827 other = 36,568 (DIOR [official])
◾36,940, incl. 3275 non-combat (FAS)
◾54,000 (Britannica, S&S)
◾54,246 (COWP)
◾33,629 KIA + 20,617 other = 54,246 (Summers, Wallechinsky, Lewy, Encyclopedia Americana)
◾33,629 (Compton's; Hastings)
◦Other
UN: 2,186 (Nahm93); 2,630 (S&S); 3,063 (Hastings, Summers); 3,194 (Wallechinsky)
◾By nation
◾UK ◾11 Nov. 2000 Times [London]: 1,078 British
◾Clodfelter, COWP, Wallechinsky: 710
◾Leckie, S&S: 670
◾Turkey ◾S&S: 720
◾COWP, Clodfelter, Leckie, Wallechinsky: 717
◾Canada ◾Clodfelter: 291
◾COWP, Leckie: 309
◾S&S: 310
◾France ◾COWP, Clodfelter, Leckie: 288
◾S&S: 290
◾Australia ◾Leckie: 265.
◾COWP, S&S: 281
◾Clodfelter: 291
◾AWM: 339 Australia
◾Greece ◾S&S: 170
◾COWP, Clodfelter, Leckie: 169
◾Columbia ◾Clodfelter, S&S, Leckie: 140
◾Ethiopia ◾Clodfelter, S&S: 120
◾Neth. ◾S&S: 110
◾COWP, Clodfelter, Leckie: 111
◾Thailand ◾S&S: 110
◾Clodfelter, Leckie: 114
◾Belgium ◾S&S: 100
◾COWP, Clodfelter: 97
◾Phillipines ◾S&S: 90
◾Clodfelter, Leckie: 92
◦TOTAL ◾1,333,060 killed + 1,067,740 missing (Nahm93, not including Chinese)
◾1,892,000 (S&S, not including civilians)
◾2,454,000 (Compton's)
◾2,488,744 (Wallechinsky)
◾2,854,000 (Britannica)
◾2,889,000 (Eckhardt)
◾3,000,000 (D. Smith)
◾3,000,000 (B&J)
◾3,062,000 (Rummel)
◾3,500,000 (Lewy, incl. 2-3M civilians)
◦[MEDIAN of TOTALS: ca. 2,950,000] or [TOTAL of MEDIANS: ca. 2,470,000]
originally posted by: Puppylove
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Still doesn't come close to accounting for it all. Or are you telling me you honestly believe what we see is what we get? When in the history of the U.S has that EVER been the case?
originally posted by: EA006
a reply to: PLAYERONE01
I'm not American, and I don't think the U.S.A would remain unscathed in a WW3 scenario.
Thanks.
originally posted by: boymonkey74
The Chinese have been going nearly 4000 years I don't think they would start any war...what would be the point?.
I do find it funny when people say "We would beat them because we have better tech"....Vietnam.