It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: hidingthistime
South america is nearly touching antartica now, yet it is still warm as can be, at that close! Lol
originally posted by: hidingthistime
South america is nearly touching antartica now, yet it is still warm as can be, at that close! Lol
he covers it all 7n the last video I posted, here, I will repost it for you.
originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: hidingthistime
Ok, then please post the link to your data backing up your claim. I posted mine. Nut I suspect you won't, and change the subject on us again. Keep that target moving and you can assure yourself nobody hits it.
Or, it this too a Mandela Effect that I thought we were discussing a Star Wars movie line, but now after the "effect" we are talking about the mean temperature of an entire continent?
You're joking? London to New York is only about 3,400 miles.
originally posted by: hidingthistime
a reply to: TerryDon79
It looks way different to me sorry.... 600 miles? It was more like 6000 before!
That's easily explained too.
He measured the difference between Australia and America as going from 8000 miles before, to now being 12000 miles.
if you guys arent willing to watch any videos that answer these questions, why shouldni put in my time for you? You are not really here looking for answers, you are both just here waiting, ever so anxiously, to shoot down everything I say.
originally posted by: Krakatoa
a reply to: hidingthistime
A YouTube video is not raw data....sorry. That is unacceptable for data to backup a temperature claim. Please use an accredited climate recording organization.
I refuse to provide "clicks" to a YouTube channel to boost the earnings of charlatans....AGAIN, SORRY.
originally posted by: hidingthistime
a reply to: TerryDon79
He is from Australia, he measured from the same point every time as he was planning a trip. Nice try though.
he thinks the landmasses are in the right spots and someone is screwing with the maps. Nothing has moved at all, just the maps are being messed with.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: hidingthistime
a reply to: TerryDon79
He is from Australia, he measured from the same point every time as he was planning a trip. Nice try though.
I'm sorry, but a large land mass moving 4,000 miles would have a MASSIVE effect on a lot of other things.
Things like plate tectonics, flight times, flight directions, weather patterns, clouds, water flow patterns, water temperatures and a whole host of other things.
originally posted by: hidingthistime
he thinks the landmasses are in the right spots and someone is screwing with the maps. Nothing has moved at all, just the maps are being messed with.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: hidingthistime
a reply to: TerryDon79
He is from Australia, he measured from the same point every time as he was planning a trip. Nice try though.
I'm sorry, but a large land mass moving 4,000 miles would have a MASSIVE effect on a lot of other things.
Things like plate tectonics, flight times, flight directions, weather patterns, clouds, water flow patterns, water temperatures and a whole host of other things.
There is cutting and pasting evidence all over the place.
yes, he talks about the rendering, but they are in HUGE chunks, not just the sizes of the pictures, just go and tak a look.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: hidingthistime
he thinks the landmasses are in the right spots and someone is screwing with the maps. Nothing has moved at all, just the maps are being messed with.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: hidingthistime
a reply to: TerryDon79
He is from Australia, he measured from the same point every time as he was planning a trip. Nice try though.
I'm sorry, but a large land mass moving 4,000 miles would have a MASSIVE effect on a lot of other things.
Things like plate tectonics, flight times, flight directions, weather patterns, clouds, water flow patterns, water temperatures and a whole host of other things.
There is cutting and pasting evidence all over the place.
No one is screwing with the maps.
You know WHY there is evidence of cutting and pasting? Because Google Earth works on individual images compiled together. Not all of the pictures are taken at the exact same time of day or the exact place. It's multiple images stitched together, so you will get artifacts and rendering differences.
Huge chunks are still pictures. 20 little pictures in one section would be noticeably different if they were done at, say, night time.
originally posted by: hidingthistime
yes, he talks about the rendering, but they are in HUGE chunks, not just the sizes of the pictures, just go and tak a look.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: hidingthistime
he thinks the landmasses are in the right spots and someone is screwing with the maps. Nothing has moved at all, just the maps are being messed with.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
originally posted by: hidingthistime
a reply to: TerryDon79
He is from Australia, he measured from the same point every time as he was planning a trip. Nice try though.
I'm sorry, but a large land mass moving 4,000 miles would have a MASSIVE effect on a lot of other things.
Things like plate tectonics, flight times, flight directions, weather patterns, clouds, water flow patterns, water temperatures and a whole host of other things.
There is cutting and pasting evidence all over the place.
No one is screwing with the maps.
You know WHY there is evidence of cutting and pasting? Because Google Earth works on individual images compiled together. Not all of the pictures are taken at the exact same time of day or the exact place. It's multiple images stitched together, so you will get artifacts and rendering differences.
I'm afraid that all he's trying to do is make sense of something really simple with an explanation that makes no sense.
This guy is quite on the ball, and not some crackpot.
You think his "they're changing the maps, but I don't know why" makes more sense than "it's a computer compiled model of million of pictures. There will be a lot of artifacts and rebdering problems"?
His ideas make the most sense I have heard yet.