It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AnteBellum
I thought this theory was what that other famous physicist came up with first. He started out as a plumber and had some type of arguement with Hawkins over this very issue until Hawkins finally conceded to its validity. . .
Can't remember his name, sorry.
originally posted by: AceWombat04
a reply to: Maverick7
Slight addendum: I meant to say crushed at the singularity (or, as you say, intact but irretrievable.)
But my main question is: is this really new, or just a refinement of the existing theory that already expounded on this years ago?
Peace.
originally posted by: sycomix
a reply to: Kapusta
Firstly old theory, circa 2010, secondly there is a theoretical exit aperture for black holes. Given that there would be no need of information storage in the event horizon. It is not the destruction of matter, or energy, or information. It would seam the most likely solution to the function of a black hole would be condense and compress matter and energy for conservation, the exit aperture emits x-ray and gamma ray bursts, this is the information converted into a new format. (kinda like zipping files on your PC)
originally posted by: Sparky63
So, if we had a black hole of manageable size, whatever that is, and we funneled enough antimatter into the black hole would that cause the black hole to evaporate? Or would the massive gravity remove any distinction between regular and antimatter, thereby increasing the mass of the black hole?
originally posted by: BELIEVERpriest
a reply to: Kapusta
So many theories about a phenomenon that hasn't even been observed yet, let alone proven to even exist.
Sounds more like religion than science to me.
originally posted by: Parthin96
I'm grateful for the science popularizers, like him and Bill Nye. Someone needs to speak up against such widespread nonsense as Creationism, anti-vaxxers, anti-GMO. My post simply pointed out that are there are others doing unheralded work that has more significance.
a reply to: Kapusta