An Appeal to separate chemtrails from geo-engineering

a reply to: soulpowertothendegree

Can you explain why using a source other than a chemtrail blog or site?

a reply to: soulpowertothendegree

ok - simple question :

which REAL geo-engineeering proposal would leave visible white " trails " at ASL 25k -45k feet ????????????

heck - which would even operate at these altitudes ???????????????

a reply to: network dude

I don't think it should be dumped in skunk works.

Well remember it was until they cried about it needing it's own forum.

Which is what we have now, but of course it was changed to Geoengineering/chemtrails because they said they were the same thing.

Now we know different...so chemtrails really don't deserve their own forum, but I have no idea where to send them next except the hoax bin until we have actual evidence they could be real.

But that is just my 2 cents on that.

a reply to: soulpowertothendegree

Unfortunately, what some fail to realize about this matter is that geo-engineering and chemtrails go hand in hand

Actually one is actually being studied by real scientists...chemtrails are a figment of Will Thomas imagination.

Meaning no real scientist has ever found evidence they exist...care to provide a real scientist that can show they do?

So no they do in fact have nothing that proves they go hand in hand.

a reply to: soulpowertothendegree

You are wrong.

Prove him wrong then if you can...I would love to see you try.

originally posted by: tsurfer2000h
a reply to: soulpowertothendegree

You are wrong.

Prove him wrong then if you can...I would love to see you try.

As would I.

Anyhoo... I'm all for the idea of separating geoengineering from the chemtrail silliness, but not before we get a proper history forum, dagnabbit!

Geoengineering would fit just fine in Fragile Earth.
Leaving "chemtrails" with their own forum? No.
Just...no.

How about one forum called "Climate Engineering"?

a reply to: ConnectDots
That's what geoengineering is.

a reply to: Phage

Well, anyone wanting to discuss chemtrails could post there, could they not?

Or, is the idea to shut out chemtrails because certain individuals think they're bunk?

a reply to: ConnectDots
I'm not sure what the idea is, actually.
Dropping "chemtrails" from the name of the forum wouldn't, it seems, make much difference. Nothing is stopping anyone from starting threads about real geoengineering here.

a reply to: Phage

I think it might be helpful to have the title just have one term in it, which is not the term "chemtrail," which does have baggage associated with it that we could do without quite nicely.

Modifying, Creating or Altering a forum on ATS, the way ATS is structured, is a major undertaking.

Nothing is stopping anyone from creating any thread related to Geo-Engineering in this forum.

This thread is closed unless / until Admin wants to weigh in.

Thank you all

Semper