It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
But some agency has confirmed classified info was emailed.
And Hillery herself said she was going to scrub the personal stuff and leave the official stuff.
She (and other SD employees) used her server for official transmissions.
July 1, 2015
The State Department on Wednesday conceded that two dozen of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s emails did contain classified information, a fact that could trigger a U.S. policy that authorizes the government to take control of her private server and sanitize the contents.
Admission of Hillary Clinton’s classified emails opens door for feds to seize her servers
Discrepancies regarding when emails were erased from Hillary Clinton's private server have raised questions of whether the former secretary of state had a device other than the one that was recently obtained by the FBI.
"There's pretty definite time stamps when you move information from one computer to another," Marcus Rogers, head of computer information technology at Purdue University, told The Washington Examiner on Saturday. "Somebody knows exactly when this happened because those time stamps are there."
The intelligence source told The Times it is unclear at this point whether these steps already have been taken in the case of Mrs. Clinton
State spokesman John Kirby said on Wednesday those 25 were deemed classified at the time of review and that it does not necessarily reflect on Mrs. Clinton.
“In the review process it was deemed that some of the information, at least some of the information in that traffic, should be classified, and so it was,” Mr. Kirby said. “That doesn’t mean that at the time it was sent it needed to have been classified.”
When asked whether State will try to determine that, he said, “I’m not aware of any investigative effort to affix blame for that.”
The intelligence source told The Times that State did not have the option of classifying them in the past because they did not know they existed until an internal State review and pressure from the House committee investigating Benghazi.
The State Department did not comment on requests about why it did not comply with the DHS security review requirement.
"There are reviews and investigations under way, including by the IG and Congress," said State Department Spokesman Alec Gerlach. "It would not be appropriate to comment on these matters at this time."
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
a reply to: introvert
I am not sure that it applies to government, but in the world of business, what she did is a felony. She did not maintain the records from the email server, which would be reasonably believed to be records that are legally relevant. If i did that, it would be a felony and a huge fine.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: introvert
Well if there's a smear campaign going on, Maybe Obama is in on some sinister plot to unthrone Hillary in favor of another "Candidate".
Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense,
(1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or
(2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
18 U.S.C § 793(f) governs the “position” of “photograph, photographic negative,
blueprint, plan, map . . . relating to the national defense
Published on Aug 18, 2015
Rudy Giuliani says that Hillary Clinton is going to need a criminal lawyer. The former Federal prosecutor said Clinton is susceptible to at least half a dozen Federal charges, including:Conflict of Interest,Obstruction of Justice,Destruction of Government Property,Mishandling Classified Information.
Rudy Giuliani:Hillary Clinton Needs a Criminal Lawyer | Hannity 8 /18 /15
originally posted by: Phoenix
"Classified" is not a prerequisite in violating this law.
The term "relating to the national defense" does not mean "classified" in regards to this law.
Is that correct?