It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: shaneslaughta
a reply to: starfoxxx
I say at the least because, you have to be harmed to claim assault. Bruises abrasions what have you. But you only have to claim to be scared to press harassment charges.
originally posted by: Domo1
a reply to: alienjuggalo
It looked like that to me at first, but I don't think he was trying to choke him. That's the easiest area to grab if you're trying to get someone in a car and they're not going. If he was choking him the guy wouldn't have been able to keep screaming, and he wouldn't have had to try very hard considering dude was handcuffed.
I don't know enough about the situation to say if the guy should have been arrested, but I'm thinking probably not.
originally posted by: Domo1
a reply to: shaneslaughta
I call that baiting and entrapment.
It certainly isn't entrapment. I wouldn't call it baiting either, perhaps giving someone enough rope to hang themselves.
originally posted by: starfoxxx
originally posted by: alienjuggalo
originally posted by: Domo1
It's hard to yell if you're actually being choked.
Its obvious he is trying to choke him.. cmon.. It doesnt matter anyway because he should not be getting arrested period..
TRUMPED up charge of disorderly conduct, it'll get thrown out of court..
EXCEPT now they can say he was resisting arrest..
He should of just let them take him at that point instead of
feeding the trolls. He let them get to him which is what
they wanted...
On topic. All who say he wasn't being choked. Let someone put their hands around your neck and see what you call it.....