Bernie Sanders is a nothing.

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: Kratos40

History shows that incumbent vice-presidents always win the electorate.

Al Gore may disagree with you.

Well that whole vote was rigged and it came down to a biased Supreme Court. Remember the whole "chad' controvesy? Otherwise, he would HAVE been our President.
Really? The Florida vote counters had to decided what was a "punched" chad or not. That was ridiculous.
We would not have to invade Iraq if Gore would in power. Afghanistan yes, but not Iraq. Wasted billions of tax payers money because bush/cheney decieved the American public that Saddam has WMDs. What a joke!

originally posted by: HammyCat

originally posted by: projectvxn

I find abortion abhorrent.

You do not get to choose who can and can not give up their fetus.
There are many reasons why people do. It is their choice not yours.

Health care isn't a right. YOU are responsible for your own health.

You have health insurance? Because I guarantee that your weekly / monthly payment wouldn't cover the full cost if you got cancer.

----

Do you really need an automatic to shoot a deer?

spray and pray you got it right?

Stop trying to sell it as anything other than feel good liberal BS.

Abortion needs to be banned lets force a kid with Anencephaly to be born so the parents can watch it live maybe 8 hours before it dies then they still have to pay that god awful hospital bill.

But you feel good don't you, even though you never met them.

You don`t get to choose who uses a semi-auto for deer.



Deer and hunting is mentioned nowhere in the Constitution.



Abortion?I want a Lamborghini.



Healthcare was never a right,Gov got involved and sent prices through the atmosphere.

Bernie Sanders is still a nothing.

a reply to: Sunwolf

All while trump is considered our knight in shining armor...

You mean"Knight",don`t you?Nope none of them are worth my vote,so far,but at least Trump has business experience unlike the latest raft of do nothing socialists.

a reply to: Sunwolf

His business experience is having other people pay for his business and then screwing them out of the money they gave him...

All while growing up with a silver spoon in his mouth.

The anti anything socialist propaganda does so well in this nation.

Socialists don`t have a good track record,ya know?You know like Hillary, or Pol Pot?

originally posted by: Sunwolf
Socialists don`t have a good track record,ya know?You know like Hillary, or Pol Pot?

General Tito(Yugoslavia) was lauded at home and abroad. Your point?

a reply to: Sunwolf

If the argument is I need my Automatic for hunting my reply is do you really need an automatic for hunting.
I am for guns, I would love to see only blackpowder hunting allowed ( in firearms ) but I do not vote against taking any away.
I believe you have the right to have any weapon, but don't say its for hunting when you and I know better.

If you need 50 rounds to shoot a deer then you need to learn to shoot. I'm not stopping you. I won't vote against it.

If the argument is I want an Automatic to protect my family my home my self from the government
Go ahead have one just don't use the excuse it's for hunting tell the truth.

Abortion?I want a Lamborghini.

Uhm good for you? Hope you have fun with it? Hope you don't wreck it?

Gov got involved and sent prices through the atmosphere.

Prices went up before the government got involved. Hospitals, clinics, etc started raising prices taking advantage of insurance. Over charging , charging for things that weren't needed just to make a buck. Then health insurance company's kept raising the prices to make up for the cost they were paying out.

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: Sunwolf
Socialists don`t have a good track record,ya know?You know like Hillary, or Pol Pot?

General Tito(Yugoslavia) was lauded at home and abroad. Your point?

Uh,he was a socialist.

originally posted by: Sunwolf

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: Sunwolf
Socialists don`t have a good track record,ya know?You know like Hillary, or Pol Pot?

General Tito(Yugoslavia) was lauded at home and abroad. Your point?

Uh,he was a socialist.

Right. And successful at home and in the international arena as well.

a reply to: Sunwolf

Hiliary isn't a socialist, she is an establishment democrat.
I wouldn't want to see her in office either.

And of course you want to go Pol Pot, because that obviously is the only example.
Not the actual modern day examples we have all around the world.

originally posted by: Sunwolf
You mean"Knight",don`t you?Nope none of them are worth my vote,so far,but at least Trump has business experience unlike the latest raft of do nothing socialists.

Yes his experience of bankrupting companies will do great things for this nation. The last republican in office had a habit of bankrupting companies until Saudi money got behind him and look the terrible shape he left the nation.

a reply to: Sremmos80

Hilary makes Satan look like "My Pretty Pony".

I'd rather be ruled by an honest socialist than her.

Gonna jump in on this real quick

originally posted by: Sunwolf
Socialists don`t have a good track record,ya know?You know like Hillary, or Pol Pot?

originally posted by: intrepid
General Tito(Yugoslavia) was lauded at home and abroad. Your point?

originally posted by: Sunwolf
Uh,he was a socialist.

@ Sunwolf

laud: praise (a person or their achievements) highly, especially in a public context.
"the obituary lauded him as a great statesman and soldier"

As in he has a good track record

As far as the gun argument, the SA is not in place for hunting purposes. To read the line that says "A well regulated militia" and thinking it has anything to do with hunting is just ignorant. It also says "shall not be infringed", which is exactly what Bernie would be doing by trying to take away any weapons that do not have the explicit purpose of hunting.

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: Sunwolf

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: Sunwolf
Socialists don`t have a good track record,ya know?You know like Hillary, or Pol Pot?

General Tito(Yugoslavia) was lauded at home and abroad. Your point?

Uh,he was a socialist.

Right. And successful at home and in the international arena as well.

Successful at being a tyrant and a murderer you mean:


www.infoplease.com...

a reply to: projectvxn

The military is one of the most socialist organizations in America.

-Healthcare provided for

-Job given to you based on ability

-Free meals in the mess hall

-Discounted groceries at the base exchange or AAFES

-Clothing for work taken care of (uniforms)

-Discounted gasoline on military bases for troops and dependents

-Free gym access for troops and dependents

-Free housing

-Off-base housing allowance

Basically, you can show up for a job with the military with nothing but the clothes on your back and be just fine. The military will provide and give you everything you need to live. The base itself is a little socialist enclave with it's own culture.

You can be married to a military member and never leave the base, and have pretty much all your needs met, either given to you or at discount due to the military. That's pretty damn socialist. I find it ironic that so many troops hate "socialism" and are staunch conservatives, yet they work for and live in a model socialist society.

See, even the lowest paid person in the military has a basic standard of living with basic necessities met. This is a key tenet in socialism, that everyone has their basic needs met.

originally posted by: Sunwolf

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: Sunwolf

originally posted by: intrepid

originally posted by: Sunwolf
Socialists don`t have a good track record,ya know?You know like Hillary, or Pol Pot?

General Tito(Yugoslavia) was lauded at home and abroad. Your point?

Uh,he was a socialist.

Right. And successful at home and in the international arena as well.

Successful at being a tyrant and a murderer you mean:


www.infoplease.com...

Did you read your own source?

Although Yugoslavia was closely associated with the USSR and was a leading member of the Cominform, Tito often pursued independent policies and did not hesitate to curtail the activities of Soviet agents. In 1948 the Cominform accused Tito of having deviated from the correct Communist line. Tito denied the charges and refused to submit to the Cominform, from which Yugoslavia was then expelled.

Having already transformed Yugoslavia into an armed camp, built up a highly efficient secret police, and purged dissident elements in the Communist party, Tito succeeded in maintaining his position despite the hostility of the USSR and his neighbors. Although he accepted loans from the Western powers, he initially did not alter his internal program. In later years, however, he relaxed many of the regime's strict controls, particularly those affecting the small farmers. As a result, Yugoslavia became the most liberal Communist country of Europe.

No where in YOUR source does it confirm your hypothesis. The Socialist Tito thumbed his nose at the Soviet Union for damn near 40 years. The country fell apart after his death and THAT wasn't pretty.

a reply to: MystikMushroom

Basically, you can show up for a job with the military with nothing but the clothes on your back and be just fine. The military will provide and give you everything you need to live. The base itself is a little socialist enclave with it's own culture.

Exactly.
You get a well paying job that doesn't require much to qualify for...

My old man calls them grey collar jobs, jobs that pretty train you from the ground up and then offer well pay from that.

LE requires more these days, but back in the day it is my understanding it was the same.