posted on Dec, 30 2004 @ 09:24 AM
In a recent letter published to Rense, HMason comments on the extraordinary coincidences between the existence of weather conferences and the actual
events that the conferences were gathered to speculate about. (
www.rense.com... )
In other words, the question comes up, How much experience is contrived, beforehand?
And on the other side of the coin, this morning -- satellite data
(
satellite.ehabich.info... )
says one thing and local cameras
(
sv.berkeley.edu... )
(
mthamilton.ucolick.org... )
(
cbs5.com... ) say something else.
The data on which we make heuristic plans appears to be too far out of spec, to be reliable. This is a matter for the "scientific method" to
address--is it not?
Maybe it's true--from the philosophy of science--we can't really "know" anything. So, we have to just "believe somebody who thinks he knows."