Shaun King: Race, Love, Hate and Me: A Distinctly American Story

All one has to do these days to turn tables on truth tellers is to
be rude, be defensive,
and claim that the truth tellers are racists, or bigots, or homophobes
or whatever.

That immediately stops all conversation regarding truth.

That is one of the biggest problems with our society today,
telling the truth, saying what is true is true is considered
to be not politically correct. Well, I for one am darn
tired of it and refuse to go along anymore with the
politically correct lies that are foisted on us as the truth.

On a thread the other day a white male said he wanted to be a black female
so he could open a business with the priviledges of being a black female.
It was suggested he grow his hair out, dye it black and get a tight perm.
Then go to a tanning bed weekly.
Dress like a woman and claim to be too poor to be able to afford the
surgery.
Then when challenged, be rude, be loud, be arrogant, and
call the challenger a racist and a bigot. Rinse and repeat
as often as necessary.
If further challenged say he always felt his entire life
like a black girl/woman and since that is how he always
felt, then no one should question his identity. Call
the person a racist, bigot and transgender phobe, rinse and
repeat as often as needed.
Voila a white man becomes a black woman and the bank
and contractors can not say otherwise.

Shaun just took advantage of Oprah and claimed to be
black, then he began to convince himself, like Doezel
that he really was black. I've seen pictures of his father,
who is quite white as is his mother, and so says his
birth certificate. He did it for the money and then
got in so deep and gained some personal power and
a little fame from being a black organizer, and began
to fool even himself.

Shaun and Doezel prove that in this society there is
black privilege
or white people would not be trying to "pass" for
social and societal gain.

Doezel finally admitted the truth.
Shaun should do the very easy and fairly cheap
DNA analysis that can prove if he has
African genes or not. Why isn't he doing it?
Why isn't his organization paying for it?
Simple and cheap, what is the fear in
proving it when your birth certificate and
photos of your parents prove you are white?

According to recent reports, the driving force behind the disruption of Sanders Seattle speech were members of an organization called Outside Agitators 206. The now defunct extremist organization embraces abolitionism, and view police with hatred:

F#@* the police: As an institution fundamentally rooted in white supremacy and anti-Blackness we reject the police presence in our communities, absolutely. It is our responsibility to hold each other accountable and keep each other safe

OA 206 viewed themselves as "..the first organized manifestation of the BlacklivesMatter movement." The real BlackLivesMatter movement wants the 2 ex-OA 206 members who hijacked the podium to publicly apologize to Sanders, but based on their unwavering position that Liberals are "useless" in the fight for Black lives, it isn't a realistic expectation. www.politicususa.com...

I think the background of the people involved in this discussion is pertinent to the subject at hand. As for Mr. King, a DNA test to dis-spell the allegations is not bowing to anyone, and if proven, strengthens his position and casts a racist pall on those who initiated and continued the charge.

originally posted by: Asktheanimals
a reply to: 200Plus

In King's case he isn't being tried and he doesn't have to prove anything.
Those who don't believe his story are the ones who need to provide definitive proof.

Maybe he isn't being tried BECAUSE he refuses to prove anything.

If he took the test he may well end up on trial for a very grievous crime that carries a very, very long sentence in a very, very nasty place.

For all we know he's committed a sickening crime against a person and left his DNA all over the crime scene and that is his real motive for refusing to prove his biology. King is in possession of the proof so if he'd give it up for independent scrutiny we could put this trial by media to bed couldn't we.His reasoning, as is yours, so far just comes across as smoke and mirrors.

Until he proves otherwise it is a workable theory to be used to vilify the man and the organisation he represents. He has the power to stop his reputation and that of his organisation being dragged through the mud. Yet he chooses (?) not to.

Just a quick note since it's been brought up in several posts... on BLM and Bernie Sanders and specifically what happened in Seattle. Here's an interview with Marissa Johnson who is one of the women that jumped on stage if you want the words directly from her mouth. Agree or disagree there it is.

However, it is off-topic and there is a thread to discuss that event in.