Representatives of God

originally posted by: vethumanbeing
a reply to: Trachel
Too many systems in place that have perfect synchronicity with each other (just speaking of the earth environs) to be ignored as accidental/happenstance. One major ecosystem that many ignore is the insect realm; (millions of species) yet seem to get along with each other/each has a different job. No one has proven another 'earth library' exists or has existed ever; this one was designed on purpose to serve as an experiment.

Very true point--thanks for calling it out.

I also find particular comedy in the argument of certain atheists who argue this happens to be the only universe (multiverse?) that randomly evolved with the correct variables to remain self-sustaining.

The infinite others, they vehemently argue, imploded or vanished or sank into void long ago.

Oh yeah?

So while they critique creationists for believing in a singular divine force whose existence can't be proved, they want us to believe in a googolplex of multiverses that supposedly imploded before this one randomly emerged balanced and existent through supposed probability.

In short, they critique creationists for believing in one unproven entity. But they themselves believe in a near-infinite number of unproven events.

There's poetic irony in that purported logic--and nothing but nonsense in that argument.

originally posted by: Trachel
originally posted by: vethumanbeing
a reply to: Trachel

vhb: Too many systems in place that have perfect synchronicity with each other (just speaking of the earth environs) to be ignored as accidental/happenstance. One major ecosystem that many ignore is the insect realm; (millions of species) yet seem to get along with each other/each has a different job. No one has proven another 'earth library' exists or has existed ever; this one was designed on purpose to serve as an experiment.

Trachel: Very true point--thanks for calling it out.

I also find particular comedy in the argument of certain atheists who argue this happens to be the only universe (multiverse?) that randomly evolved with the correct variables to remain self-sustaining.

The infinite others, they vehemently argue, imploded or vanished or sank into void long ago.
Oh yeah?

Multiverses if you want to go super LARGE concepts (accidently) popped into existence without any ordered system or plan in place "NOT by others"; just happened. The randomness itself would prove a creator or identity manipulated something to occur. If just the idea of Earth, with all of its ecosystems that work together perfectly was the jewel of definition of a higher thought form (field) at work this is all one needs as evidence.

Trachel: So while they critique creationists for believing in a singular divine force whose existence can't be proved, they want us to believe in a googolplex of multiverses that supposedly imploded before this one randomly emerged balanced and existent through supposed probability.

There is something intangible that animates the body form. What is it? They cannot adequately explain this as deny eternal 'spirit' energy exists and changes form constantly. Multi-universes imploded as a causal for this one; what is this madness?

Trachel: In short, they critique creationists for believing in one unproven entity. But they themselves believe in a near-infinite number of unproven events.
There's poetic irony in that purported logic--and nothing but nonsense in that argument.

God wont appear for them on command/demand? (I know its frustrating). They have to prove the unproven as yet events but as they have no imagination or faith in a near belief ALMOST MAYBE it will never happen.