It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Thanks George W Bush for going after Iraq while letting North Korea get real WMD,s.
On 12 February 2013, North Korean state media announced it had conducted an underground nuclear test, its third in seven years
originally posted by: Forensick
originally posted by: johnwick
originally posted by: hutch622
a reply to: crazyewok
Millions will die, but the rest of the world will carry on.
just a little flippant about the millions of innocents .
And ignorant of the fact one nuke would end south Korea.
We aren't talking about A bombs and leveling a city.
A nuke is thousands of times more powerful.
Think firecracker vs a 1 lbs block of C4.
That is a pretty fair comparison.
We are talking North Korean Nukes mate, I would go with A bomb if it worked at all.
The problem is North Korean threats on nuclear weapons use. I truly believe little kimmy will use them on the south.
originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: crazyewok
Thanks George W Bush for going after Iraq while letting North Korea get real WMD,s.
On 12 February 2013, North Korean state media announced it had conducted an underground nuclear test, its third in seven years
Hmmmmm.....Let me see, who was the President most of that time? Clinton? No, no it wasn't him.....Maybe Bush? No......wasn't him either. Who is that guy? Right on the tip of my tongue...It's the same one who just handed Iran a ridiculous nuclear deal...........It'll come to me.
originally posted by: Forensick
originally posted by: johnwick
originally posted by: hutch622
a reply to: crazyewok
Millions will die, but the rest of the world will carry on.
just a little flippant about the millions of innocents .
And ignorant of the fact one nuke would end south Korea.
We aren't talking about A bombs and leveling a city.
A nuke is thousands of times more powerful.
Think firecracker vs a 1 lbs block of C4.
That is a pretty fair comparison.
We are talking North Korean Nukes mate, I would go with A bomb if it worked at all.
originally posted by: Xcathdra
originally posted by: crazyewok
Thanks George W Bush for going after Iraq while letting North Korea get real WMD,s.
I do agree with what you stated here regarding the bigger threat. With that said the US does not have to lead everything.
originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: crazyewok
Thanks George W Bush for going after Iraq while letting North Korea get real WMD,s.
On 12 February 2013, North Korean state media announced it had conducted an underground nuclear test, its third in seven years
Hmmmmm.....Let me see, who was the President most of that time? Clinton? No, no it wasn't him.....Maybe Bush? No......wasn't him either. Who is that guy? Right on the tip of my tongue...It's the same one who just handed Iran a ridiculous nuclear deal...........It'll come to me.
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Xcathdra
The problem is North Korean threats on nuclear weapons use. I truly believe little kimmy will use them on the south.
Thats ridiculous. They want to unite their country, not burn it. More accurately, drive out the foreign army occupying their Peninsula.
Nukes are for protection, like any other nuclear power.
originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: crazyewok
Thanks George W Bush for going after Iraq while letting North Korea get real WMD,s.
On 12 February 2013, North Korean state media announced it had conducted an underground nuclear test, its third in seven years
Hmmmmm.....Let me see, who was the President most of that time? Clinton? No, no it wasn't him.....Maybe Bush? No......wasn't him either. Who is that guy? Right on the tip of my tongue...It's the same one who just handed Iran a ridiculous nuclear deal...........It'll come to me.
originally posted by: johnwick
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Xcathdra
The problem is North Korean threats on nuclear weapons use. I truly believe little kimmy will use them on the south.
Thats ridiculous. They want to unite their country, not burn it. More accurately, drive out the foreign army occupying their Peninsula.
Nukes are for protection, like any other nuclear power.
For a country to be "occupied " dont the citizens have to not want them there?
Because the south Korean citizens love us, and love us being there to protect them from the north.
It is more of an invitation only party in South Korea than an occupation.
originally posted by: johnwick
originally posted by: Forensick
originally posted by: johnwick
originally posted by: hutch622
a reply to: crazyewok
Millions will die, but the rest of the world will carry on.
just a little flippant about the millions of innocents .
And ignorant of the fact one nuke would end south Korea.
We aren't talking about A bombs and leveling a city.
A nuke is thousands of times more powerful.
Think firecracker vs a 1 lbs block of C4.
That is a pretty fair comparison.
We are talking North Korean Nukes mate, I would go with A bomb if it worked at all.
Lol, OK good point.
it is beer 30 down in Aussie land right now isn't it?
originally posted by: Xeven
Honestly we need to go ahead and have this war before lil Kimmy gets something he can use to launch his nukes.
Because the south Korean citizens love us, and love us being there to protect them from the north.
The army and people of the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK) are no longer what they used to be in the past when they had to counter the US nukes with rifles, North Korea… is the invincible power equipped with both [the] latest offensive and defensive means unknown to the world.
Doesn't understand the difference between occupation and an allied relationship.
Thats ridiculous. They want to unite their country, not burn it.
The 2.5-mile (4km) wide DMZ separating the two countries is the world's most heavily armed border.
It is littered with landmines, barbed wire and heavy military equipment, as well as more than one million soldiers deployed on both sides.
Please give a source which indicates that NK is working towards uniting the countries.