It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Johannmon
This is just plain silly IMO. Which is more cruel to the cat; to shoot it and kill it quickly and relatively painlessly or to catch it in a net or a noose have it panick while it is stuffed into a cage dragged off to a animal shelter where it is left in a cage for a week or two scared and out of its element and then put in a gas chamber and killed anyway?
Originally posted by Johannmon
This is just plain silly IMO. Which is more cruel to the cat; to shoot it and kill it quickly and relatively painlessly or to catch it in a net or a noose have it panick while it is stuffed into a cage dragged off to a animal shelter where it is left in a cage for a week or two scared and out of its element and then put in a gas chamber and killed anyway?
The walmart employees did nothing wrong other than to have some bleeding heart peta person see them do the right thing. Stray cats breed rabies and a host of other diseases for which Walmart could be sued if they did not dispose of the cat. Its not like they set the cats tail on fire or beat it to death. They shot it, probably in the head. The animal felt little or no pain and suffered little or no fear. What is so cruel about that?
Pigs, cows, chickens, turkeys and a host of other food animals suffer much worse fates every day than this nuicance cat did, but because some people are emotionally attached to cats they react without thinking and scream cruelty to animals. WOuld these fellows have been arrested if they shot a rat or a snake?
The hypocrisy in this story is blatant and sad. To think that three valuable human beings, two of which probably have families with children will be subjected to hearings and trials and will probably have their main source of income compromised over this is just intollerable.
if you take away the guns of a citizenry they lose the power to hold off their own army in case of dissension in the ranks. They also lose the ability to aid their army in times of civil defense. Also, why not restrict idiots instead of guns? Guns could even help with that task!
Originally posted by GradyPhilpott
I have to agree that this was an ill-advised action, but federal charges and suspension without pay and possible dismisal for killing a cat? This is insanity. It's legal to kill a human fetus by the most atrocious means imaginable and it's illegal to kill a cat. Go figure.