Human Capital - Episode 3: Planned Parenthood's Custom Abortions for Superior Product

Looks like the most recent PP slap by the Center for Medical Progress is released.

It's the 7th.

It deals with some "unethical" processes used in obtaining fetal tissue samples for research.

The controversy this time is about possible "Live" fetuses being killed?

We also know that StemExpress has stopped "doing business" with Planned Parenthood because of the recent negative exposures.

Not for the faint of heart

In the latest video produced by the Center for Medical Progress, Holly O’Donnell describes a medical technician using scissors to cut through the face of a newly aborted but nearly fully developed baby boy at a Planned Parenthood facility so that his intact brain could be extracted.

Planned Parenthood Clinic Cut Through Dead Baby’s Face to Get His Intact Brain

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

#PPSellsBabyParts PLANNED PARENTHOOD ABORTED BABY’S HEART STILL BEATING IN LATE-TERM ORGAN HARVESTING CASE
Whistleblower Who Harvested Aborted Baby Parts Inside Planned Parenthood Clinics for StemExpress Describes “Most Difficult Experience I Had There” In Latest Documentary Episode

LOS ANGELES, Aug. 19--The third episode in a new documentary web series and 7th video on Planned Parenthood’s supply of aborted fetal tissue tells a former procurement technician’s harrowing story of harvesting an intact brain from a late-term male fetus whose heart was still beating after the abortion.

Human Capital - Episode 3: Planned Parenthood's Custom Abortions for Superior Product

HHS And State Investigations Find No Violations Of Fetal Tissue Laws After Witch Hunt Sparked By Deceptively-Edited Videos

After investigations sparked by the series of undercover videos attempting to smear Planned Parenthood, probes in Georgia, Indiana, Massachusetts, and South Dakota have found "Planned Parenthood affiliates to be in full compliance with the law," according to the Huffington Post. As the Post went on to explain, "Probes in other states, like Arizona, Kansas, Louisiana, Missouri, Ohio, Tennessee and Texas, are unlikely to reveal evidence of illegal tissue donation practices, since those states' Planned Parenthood centers either don't participate in a tissue donation program, don't even have a center actively performing abortions in the state or are barred by state law from donating tissues in the first place. "

The facts of the matter demonstrate that all these videos are fraudulent garbage.

Just like in 1999. Fraudulent videos, nothing illegal discovered after multiple investigations.

Keep peddlin' the BS.

a reply to: xuenchen

This isn't possible: according to another thread today, the investigations of PP's wrongdoings are a witch hunt perpetrated by fundamentalists and Pubs. The op goes on to foresee future investigations will yield nada.
www.abovetopsecret.com...

Illegal and unethical may be used as a descriptor by some, but the former has no place according to researchers who claim "tissue procurement was done in accordance with the tissue laws." Like their livelihood and research wouldn't be compromised by reporting anything but compliance with the laws.

This last video literally made me begin to vomit in my mouth.
I'm so sad that humanity has fallen so low as to treat our children like disposable garbage we can sell for profit.

"[Jessica] taps the heart and it starts beating," O'Donnell says. "I'm sitting here and looking at this fetus and its heart is beating."

www.washingtonexaminer.com...

This right before they cut open the baby boy's face from the underside of his jaw...cut upwards to split open his face and skull in order to pull out his brain whole.

In the latest video produced by the Center for Medical Progress, Holly O’Donnell describes a medical technician using scissors to cut through the face of a newly aborted but nearly fully developed baby boy at a Planned Parenthood facility so that his intact brain could be extracted.

O’Donnell says that the technician could also make the boy’s heart beat.

www.breitbart.com...

Of course, given the way the press has ignored this at all. It's a wonder anyone anywhere knows about it. Then they use polls like the Reuters on the NYT used in their "story" on the videos.

www.powerlineblog.com...

The New York Times is typical: it has not yet mentioned today’s video. It hasn’t covered the content of the videos, except to misrepresent them and to defend Planned Parenthood. For example, today’s Times includes a story on a Reuters poll that is headlined, “Americans back federal funds for Planned Parenthood health services: poll.” The poll asked about women’s health exams, prenatal services and contraception, not abortion. The Times story begins:

Americans broadly support providing federal funding for free women’s health exams, screenings and contraception services, a Reuters/Ipsos poll has found, suggesting risks for Republicans criticizing Planned Parenthood as part of the 2016 campaigns.

So they use a poll to defend PP where the questions that garner support are about services that are NOT abortion. Then they portray that as support for the service in question - abortion.

The story did report at the bottom that 44% who saw the videos had a more negative image of PP. 34% said their views are unchanged, so either those 34% already had a very negative view to begin with OR they are the hardcore pro-abortion folks who could have their own abortion, watch the child squawk, see it get dismembered and still not care because they are that pro-choice.

And in the poll question that loosely described the videos it was also bad news:

After the videos were described to poll respondents, 39 percent said Planned Parenthood should not receive government funding and 34 percent said federal dollars should continue.

Screen cap of the poll question.

Here's the poll in question.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Why would they do that? That's NOT proper dissection protocol AND it destroys all the glands and organs in the face!

Anyone who has ever taken Biology 101 knows that fetal pig brains are taken from the crown of the skull.

WARNING; GRAPHIC
www.youtube.com...

a reply to: windword

They aren't dissecting it. They need the glands and organs in the face. They are only after the brain.

a reply to: ketsuko

They aren't dissecting it.

What? If they're not dissecting a fetus, in order to remove its brain, what are they doing, ya think?

They need the glands and organs in the face. They are only after the brain.

What qualifies you to make that analysis? With an intact fetus, everything is useful, nothing is wasted.

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: IAMTAT

Why would they do that? That's NOT proper dissection protocol AND it destroys all the glands and organs in the face!

Anyone who has ever taken Biology 101 knows that fetal pig brains are taken from the crown of the skull.

WARNING; GRAPHIC
www.youtube.com...

FYI: Fetal pigs aren't aborted human babies.
You're welcome.

a reply to: windword

1.) If it's alive, they are vivisecting it.

2.) Typically, when I was dissecting in school, we wanted to preserve all the relevant structures for learning purposes. In this case, PP is only after the profitable bits. If they aren't after the facial glands, then they don't care about the damage done to them, only that the brain is preserved for their customer.

Maybe butchery would be a better term?