Ex Subway spokesman Jared Fogle in court today for child porn charges

a reply to: Chrisfishenstein

Didn't say it's right. I said that's how we roll here. You see it everyday on this site. Everywhere for that matter

originally posted by: Reallyfolks
a reply to: Chrisfishenstein

Are you serious, that's the American way, the gun manufactures, it's all democrats, it's all republicans, it's Christians, it's Muslims, it's the school system it's the rich, the poor. Anything happens we take any and everything with in sneezing distance and link and blame and group, and implement shared fault/responsibility for all.

Well sure....why would ANYONE take personal responsibility for their own actions these days when it is much easier to get money from corporate giants by blaming them for your own issues....

a reply to: Vasa Croe

In July, 2015, Subway and Fogle mutually agreed to suspend their relationship due to the investigation, according to Subway.[15] Subway removed all references to Fogle from its website.[16] On August 18, 2015, Subway announced via Twitter that Jared no longer had a relationship with the company

He has no relationship with the company as of yesterday.....Today is his court hearing.....He is not affiliated with Subway as of his court date.

He took personal responsibility....

There is no criminal that is willing to blame their employer for their actions, especially with the argument being spewed this way on here!

a reply to: Vasa Croe

You can apply that to about any problem in life. It's always someone else or something else at fault

a reply to: Vasa Croe

so - everyone who gets served with an federal search warrant = guilty ?

so much for due process

and like i said - ATS condems everyone - so dont congratulate yourself too much on ` getting it right `

just out of curiosity - and just for ammusement - WHY did you think he was guilty when the search warrant was issued ??

diod you have any evidence ????????????

a lucky guess - hech it was 50 /50 at worset

or did you just asume he was guilty ???????????????

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Vasa Croe

so - everyone who gets served with an federal search warrant = guilty ?

so much for due process

and like i said - ATS condems everyone - so dont congratulate yourself too much on ` getting it right `

just out of curiosity - and just for ammusement - WHY did you think he was guilty when the search warrant was issued ??

diod you have any evidence ????????????

a lucky guess - hech it was 50 /50 at worset

or did you just asume he was guilty ???????????????

Federal warrant was issued, his partner was found guilty, his family was not present at the time (report was he sent them away), confiscation of computers from his house.....

Yeah...pretty much a lucky guess. If it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, I tend to say it's a duck....

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Chrisfishenstein

thank you for dishonestly cropping my post - things like that help when i am evaluating the grade of idiot i am dealing with

Oh you have Noooooooo idea!

Dishonestly? He plead guilty, correct?

You said so what? Ummm....This means --- HE IS GUILTY....

Sorry for caps but you may not understand the meaning, so I wanted to be clear.

originally posted by: ignorant_ape
a reply to: Vasa Croe

so - everyone who gets served with an federal search warrant = guilty ?

so much for due process

and like i said - ATS condems everyone - so dont congratulate yourself too much on ` getting it right `

just out of curiosity - and just for ammusement - WHY did you think he was guilty when the search warrant was issued ??

diod you have any evidence ????????????

a lucky guess - hech it was 50 /50 at worset

or did you just asume he was guilty ???????????????

Sorry but are you in the right thread?

You know there are many links posted within this thread about him being guilty...Admittedly as well??

Might want to spew your "wait for the courts" for an earlier thread bud....He already took a plea deal as a GUILTY man...Sorry if you still don't understand

a reply to: Chrisfishenstein

He's innocent until proven republican.

lolz

originally posted by: beezzer
a reply to: Chrisfishenstein

He's innocent until proven republican.

lolz

I think the dude just clicked the wrong thread...

I don't know how you prove guilt when someone says they are guilty and accepts a plea prior to trial...Is that even possible?

a reply to: Chrisfishenstein

Just because they say they are guilty and have admitted to guilt for doing illegal things does not mean they are guilty.

It just means they work in congress.

Press conference is live now.

5 year scheme beginning in 2011. Fogle learned the guy running his foundation was abusing a 14 year old girl and received pictures of it. His actions lead to the abuse of 12 minors. Two trips for sex with minors. He hasn't plead or been sentenced, only informed the U.S. Attorney and the court he intends to plead guilty.


Over 3,000 videos, almost 50,000 images. 150,000 text messages, tens of thousands of emails. Dozens of phones and computers and tablets and removable hard drives.

a reply to: Shamrock6

His attorney says he "expects to go to prison."

As well he should.

I hope he likes pepperoni.

a reply to: ignorant_ape

No i think the point is people who plead "guilty" often are..I believe people get railroaded on occasion but not this time.

a reply to: Chrisfishenstein

sorry that you cannot actually read :

- WHY did you think he was guilty when the search warrant was issued ??

if you cannot or will not comprehend basic english then there is no point carrying on

a reply to: ignorant_ape

Okay, AGAIN HERE IS YOUR.....YES YOUR QUOTE:

yup - mr fogel has apparently entered a guilty plea

but so what

I said you answered yourself....You said BUT SO WHAT??

That means --- HE IS GUILTY!!! Period.....

You are arguing with me about something you were discussing on another thread buddy! This is the first Jared thread I have entered, so AGAIN I shall ask you....

How is someone who pleads guilty before trial NOT guilty?

Please don't bring another thread that I wasn't involved back into this one again!

a reply to: Shamrock6

Over 3,000 videos, almost 50,000 images. 150,000 text messages, tens of thousands of emails. Dozens of phones and computers and tablets and removable hard drives.

Is that all in his house?

originally posted by: alienjuggalo
a reply to: Shamrock6

Over 3,000 videos, almost 50,000 images. 150,000 text messages, tens of thousands of emails. Dozens of phones and computers and tablets and removable hard drives.

Is that all in his house?

All in his mind.....YUCKY.....

originally posted by: Chrisfishenstein

originally posted by: alienjuggalo
a reply to: Shamrock6

Over 3,000 videos, almost 50,000 images. 150,000 text messages, tens of thousands of emails. Dozens of phones and computers and tablets and removable hard drives.

Is that all in his house?

All in his mind.....YUCKY.....

LOL, He cant help it he was born that way... JOKE