It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: eManym
The epic world wide economic crash has been fallacy that has been tossed around for over a decade and won't happen. There is a process going on with economic decline but it is very slow. So slow that people will grow accustomed to the changes and accept it as just the status quo.
originally posted by: FamCore
originally posted by: eManym
The epic world wide economic crash has been fallacy that has been tossed around for over a decade and won't happen. There is a process going on with economic decline but it is very slow. So slow that people will grow accustomed to the changes and accept it as just the status quo.
Why do you believe the economic crash is a "fallacy"? Are you well-read in macro economics and the various fiat monetary systems being used by the world's "great" economies of today? Can you elaborate at all? I sure would love to know what I am missing here
originally posted by: Reallyfolks
Doomsday clock for global market crash strikes one minute to midnight as central banks lose control
www.telegraph.co.uk...
No more tricks for next recovery
originally posted by: Reallyfolks
a reply to: Aazadan
Ok but we are on a fiat currency, basically it's worth nothing but we imagine and have faith in. If one fiat currency crashes, is it really logical to assume people would imagine or have faith that it's worth more or better than just what crashed?
originally posted by: Reallyfolks
a reply to: Aazadan
So the new currency with no real value, would be worth 1 million of the old currency with no real value. The savings would be wiped out. Wow who knew it would be that simple
originally posted by: Reallyfolks
a reply to: Aazadan
Ok but we are on a fiat currency, basically it's worth nothing but we imagine and have faith in. If one fiat currency crashes, is it really logical to assume people would imagine or have faith that it's worth more or better than just what crashed?
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: spy66
The printing of money is already largely outside of the hands of individual nations. No single nation controls the supply of Euro's and every bank in the US has the ability to create dollars. Any one world currency would be beyond the printing control of a specific nation, instead it would be under the control of multinational banks just as various national currencies are now.
originally posted by: Aazadan
originally posted by: Reallyfolks
a reply to: Aazadan
So the new currency with no real value, would be worth 1 million of the old currency with no real value. The savings would be wiped out. Wow who knew it would be that simple
Simple doesn't mean painless.
At the end of the day currency is necessary because not all jobs trade with each other equally. An hour of work from a plumber is not worth the same as an hour of work from a typist, or an hour of work from a lawyer. Currency represents a system of measuring the value of these works against each other and facilitating trade. Currency and credit (all currency is basically credit, since the currency is debt based) are nothing more than a ledger stating how much work you are entitled to from others. That ledger doesn't need any hard asset behind it because it's representing the work of others.
Does that make sense to you?
originally posted by: Reallyfolks
a reply to: Aazadan
Wouldn't say they create currency as much as they create purchasing power through fractional reserve banking. Fed creates currency or rather federal reserve notes at 260 per every 1000 printed.