It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RealTruthSeeker
originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: RealTruthSeeker
...cool beans. now you prove a supernatural force (specifically the one you are advocating here) is/was responsible for the genesis and evolution of life on planet earth.
You assume to much, did I say anything in this thread about the supernatural being responsible for anything? No I didn't so stop putting words in my mouth.
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: RealTruthSeeker
Did you really not read the entire article? Evidently not.
Again, please explain how any of this has anything to do with the mountain of evidence in favour of evolution or the deafening lack of evidence for creationism.
originally posted by: johnwick
My main problem is that slow mutation of just say the eye, doesn't seem possible.
Because it would require it to be formed not just the eye, but the nerves and the processing centers of the brain in tandem.
Otherwise it gives no advantage and takes energy away from the body.
That is a hinderence, not an advantage.
And until such a time as it was functional it would only be a drain.
originally posted by: pheonix358
a reply to: ServantOfTheLamb
No one is saying we have all of the answers.
But to use this as an excuse to push creation is just pure BS.
Science is still looking for answers.
So, how about you prove God did it all. All you have is belief and while it may be your cup of tea, it is not mine.
Science will continue to unravel these and many more mysteries. 100 years ago we had absolutely no idea that DNA, Genes and a whole lot of other goodies even existed.
We are getting there. In 2000 years, no one has been able to prove that God exists.
Really, God is all loving, he loves each and every one of us, ........ now ......... get ready for Armageddon!
No thanks.
P
originally posted by: Phantom423
a reply to: ServantOfTheLamb
Your question is poorly thought out. Darwin knew nothing about molecular biology and genetics. His work was developed simply on observation.
Creationists deliberately rewrite history and science to suit their agenda. Most people don't fall for it - fortunately.
originally posted by: Answer
If someone were able to answer the questions in your OP to your complete satisfaction, it would not change your opinion one iota about the validity of the Theory of Evolution so, and I'm asking this with 100% sincerity, what is the purpose of this thread?
To me, it seems to be yet another in a very long line of threads that is basically nothing more than a religious person saying "Evolution is so dumb, this is what those dummies believe with all their dumb science lol."
DON'T be alarmed, but you have alien DNA in your genetic code. Science says so.
Scientists from Kazakhstan believe that human DNA was encoded with an extraterrestrial signal by an ancient alien civilisation, Discovery.com reports.
They call it "biological SETI" and the researchers claim that the mathematical code in human DNA cannot be explained by evolution.
In a nutshell, we're living, breathing vessels for some kind of alien message which is more easily used to detect extra terrestrial life than via radio transmission.
"Once fixed, the code might stay unchanged over cosmological timescales; in fact, it is the most durable construct known," the researchers wrote in scientific journal, Icarus. "Therefore it represents an exceptionally reliable storage for an intelligent signature.
"Once the genome is appropriately rewritten the new code with a signature will stay frozen in the cell and its progeny, which might then be delivered through space and time."
The scientists also claim that human DNA is ordered so precisely that it reveals an "ensemble of arithmetical and ideographical patterns of symbolic language".
Their research has led the scientists to conclude that we were invented "outside the solar system, already several billion years ago".
The thesis supports the hypothesis that Earth is the result of interstellar life forms distributed by meteors and comets.
So if we are just vessels for alien communication, exactly what kind of secret message are we carrying in our DNA?
And if we were the creation of aliens, who created them?
Evolution IS dumb.
It really is amazing watching otherwise rational people try to explain how all of this works, like they know the framework, like it is just a matter of time if they continue down this path to finding out EVERYTHING.
I contend, that HUMANS, do not match ANY stage or parameter, but good luck trying to tell us we just formed out of some crazy coincidence.
Oh wait, that IS what we are being told.
Just because the Creationist story seems silly, why must you easily fall for the ridiculous INCREDIBLE amount of impossibilities that occur in every narrative otherwise ??
Quite likely this entire adventure is being misdirected just as much as anything, but everyone will try desperately for thousands of more years before finally realizing they were being intentionally MISLED.
originally posted by: weirdguy
a reply to: RealTruthSeeker
Well #, it must be the magic man in the sky then.
originally posted by: ParasuvO
originally posted by: Phantom423
a reply to: ServantOfTheLamb
Your question is poorly thought out. Darwin knew nothing about molecular biology and genetics. His work was developed simply on observation.
Creationists deliberately rewrite history and science to suit their agenda. Most people don't fall for it - fortunately.
SCIENTISTS deliberately rewrite history and science to suit their agenda.
Most people DO fall for it - unfortunately.
originally posted by: Masterjaden
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Do you have absolutely ANYTHING in your repertoire than an appeal to authority fallacy??? I'm sorry but your gods (scientists) are not the be all end all of knowledge, most of them are wrong as has been meted out throughout history..
The first step in acquiring real knowledge is acknowledging this fact, the modern paradigms are most certainly wrong. This is even more true now, (not less as likes to be portrayed) because of specialization within fields. No one wants to question anyone outside of their specialty, so instead they fudge (throw out outlier data) any numbers that don't fit establishment guidelines.
Jaden
originally posted by: ParasuvO
Creationism IS dumb.
It really is amazing watching otherwise irrational people try to explain how all of this works, like they know the framework, like it is just a matter of time if they continue down this path to finding out EVERYTHING.
I contend, that HUMANS, do not match ANY stage or parameter, but good luck trying to tell us we just formed out of some crazy mythical diety's doing.
Oh wait, that IS what we are being told.
Just because the Evolution story seems silly, why must you easily fall for the ridiculous INCREDIBLE amount of impossibilities that occur in every narrative otherwise ??
Quite likely this entire adventure is being misdirected just as much as anything, but everyone will try desperately for thousands of more years before finally realizing they were being intentionally MISLED.
originally posted by: bottleslingguy
you're probably right that there is some self sustaining process that keeps life going and adapting but that still doesn't mean some earlier evolved species from another planet couldn't have blended their genes with one of the natural creatures here on this planet. earlier hominids took millions of years to morphologically change and modern humans just appeared less than two hundred thousand years ago from what? not Neanderthal, not denisovans, so from what?
where are the intermediate species? where did they disappear to? Why can't we find any record of them but we do find the record of civilizations that go back over one hundred thousand years.
There's just no time for your idea that we were part of the natural order here on Earth to work in a natural cadence.
originally posted by: Masterjaden
a reply to: Krazysh0t
Do you have absolutely ANYTHING in your repertoire than an appeal to authority fallacy??? I'm sorry but your gods (scientists) are not the be all end all of knowledge, most of them are wrong as has been meted out throughout history..
The first step in acquiring real knowledge is acknowledging this fact, the modern paradigms are most certainly wrong. This is even more true now, (not less as likes to be portrayed) because of specialization within fields. No one wants to question anyone outside of their specialty, so instead they fudge (throw out outlier data) any numbers that don't fit establishment guidelines.
Jaden
I never said it had anything to do with either, just pointing out the fact that those drawings are fake but have being passed off in textbooks as proof of evolution.
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: RealTruthSeeker
Did you really not read the entire article? Evidently not.
Again, please explain how any of this has anything to do with the mountain of evidence in favour of evolution or the deafening lack of evidence for creationism.
originally posted by: MrConspiracy
HA the minute you attack Darwinism you get called a creationist and believer in God.
Some of you are narrow minded.
originally posted by: ParasuvO
Science is getting us NOWHERE... in regards to anything of importance such as HOW.
Science is wholly and totally controlled to slow it down and make sure it does not ever find it either.
In the exact same way religion and "creationism" is used.
It is just as retarded to believe that "science" is going to ever answer the real questions, since it is NOT ASKING THEM.