It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: preludefanguy
a reply to: Trachel
the buddha was called the self awoken one
there was no mystical transference of attainment from the spirits
it is beyond all phenomenal states, including a neurological state or an exchange of chemistry in the body systems; these might be states attained in meditation, but they are not liberation
originally posted by: Profusion
Consider the "Illuminati" for example. They claim to have 'enlightenment' while committing horrendous acts. Many popes throughout history, many cults and secret societies throughout history, many countries throughout history have claimed to have 'enlightenment' while committing horrendous acts. Is it possible to be enlightened while committing horrendous acts?
originally posted by: woodwardjnr
I don't really know what enlightenment is. I get the feeling it's a process of discovering things that should be obvious, but take a while to clearly register in your thought process.
I think this is a crucial question. Consider the "Illuminati" for example. They claim to have 'enlightenment' while committing horrendous acts. Many popes throughout history, many cults and secret societies throughout history, many countries throughout history have claimed to have 'enlightenment' while committing horrendous acts. Is it possible to be enlightened while committing horrendous acts? I ask that question because I think that many people would claim that enlightened people would be incapable of committing horrendous acts. Do you agree?
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
originally posted by: woodwardjnr
I don't really know what enlightenment is. I get the feeling it's a process of discovering things that should be obvious, but take a while to clearly register in your thought process.
It is more like discovering that there are no things - that there is only what is happening - which is not a thing. And realizing that thoughts are not 'your' thoughts and that thoughts can never speak about you.
Thought just appears - watch closely and notice that you cannot possibly know what thought will arise next.
originally posted by: arpgme
a reply to: Itisnowagain
Thought just appears - watch closely and notice that you cannot possibly know what thought will arise next.
Some people can.
It's called having focus/concentration/self-control.
originally posted by: arpgme
a reply to: Itisnowagain
Thought just appears - watch closely and notice that you cannot possibly know what thought will arise next.
Some people can.
It's called having focus/concentration/self-control.
originally posted by: Itisnowagain
originally posted by: arpgme
a reply to: Itisnowagain
Thought just appears - watch closely and notice that you cannot possibly know what thought will arise next.
Some people can.
It's called having focus/concentration/self-control.
The true self can only be AWARE of what is arising.
Here is what might arise when you realize that what you really are is just aware.
You cannot control anything - you are just seeing the show.
If what is showing, is stories about how life could be better, stories about 'me in time', stories and ideas about how to make the world a better place - then that is what is filling the screen of awareness - but if it is realized that what I really am is the entire screen - the stories tend to drop away and what is here and now can be seen in it's true glory. Then there is clear seeing, clear hearing of what there really is - without the veil.
originally posted by: RobinB022
a reply to: Profusion
I think this is a crucial question. Consider the "Illuminati" for example. They claim to have 'enlightenment' while committing horrendous acts. Many popes throughout history, many cults and secret societies throughout history, many countries throughout history have claimed to have 'enlightenment' while committing horrendous acts. Is it possible to be enlightened while committing horrendous acts? I ask that question because I think that many people would claim that enlightened people would be incapable of committing horrendous acts. Do you agree?
A person can know what 'enlightenment' means without actually being enlightened.
I feel that the truly enlightened would be incapable, or rather unwilling, to act in a horrendous manner. There would be absolutely no need to treat another person in a negative way. How can a person be enlightened and yet still mistreat another..
Just because you can doesn't mean you should. An enlightened person who mistreats another would be like mistreating themselves.