It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Help ATS via PayPal:
learn more

I am Not a Homophobe! But...

page: 9
<< 6  7  8    10  11 >>

log in


posted on Aug, 17 2015 @ 10:06 PM

originally posted by: mymojo
Im no homophobe. Love the sinner, but hate the sin.

I believe heterosexual men are the worst of all Sin:
Heterosexual men are akin to the one named CAIN, he who was born of pure evil: endlessly surrounded by the stench of death and murder..

Gay folk, in contrast, simply practice the laws of love, and loving kindness..
edit on 17-8-2015 by tony9802 because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 17 2015 @ 10:39 PM

originally posted by: mymojo
...Gone Againt Yahweh--

It is corporate America INC. that has gone against Yahweh, (his true name is Allah in Aramaic), It is corporate America INC. that has gone against Yahweh, (his true name is Allah in Aramaic); It is corporate America INC. that has gone against Yahweh (his true name is Allah, in Aramaic),..


edit on 17-8-2015 by tony9802 because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 17 2015 @ 11:00 PM

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
Thank you for all the great comments; well, most of the non-hateful ones.

It's interesting to see the venom on both sides of this topic. Some folks are really angry about even posting such a topic...makes me wonder. As I've stated all along, I have no issue with sexual preference in everyday life. What I take issue with is the media trying to portray it as a larger representation of the populous than it really is. From there this topic has become a venomous debate about sexuality preferences. Again, I don't care. I just have an issue with the media making it something other than what it really is.

It seems some here have some real anger issues. Oh doesn't change my opinion in the OP, or my opinion going forward. My position stands.


I am not sure if you've been following the news very much lately, but there is a reason why gay representation is occurring more on TV: the reason is that there is an effort to demonize right wing fundamentalists who no longer believe in democracy and would prefer to live in a repressive theocracy. The media is operating for the NWO and it is creating the appropriate schism and division in society by highlighting gay issues and bringing them into mainstream discussion. It isolates and alienates Xtian fundamentalists-- As such, the gay community is the perfect pawn to rouse, stir up and use against the old Fundies. If you think the MSM and NWO sincerely and genuinely care about LGBQT issues, you are sorely mistaken: LGBQT is being utilized and manipulated to create the perfect end of days scenario here on planet Inc USA earth, just before the nuclear devices go off before WWIII begins. Does that make sense? Gay community issues also serve as a distraction from even greater issues in the u.s. such as an Islamic Communist invasion, a third world war,nuclear detonation, extinction of humankind, global financial collapse, Iranian conflagration.. Is anyone else following any of this, or am I the only that's worried?

edit on 17-8-2015 by tony9802 because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 17 2015 @ 11:40 PM
Too many Gays on TV? what world are you living in.. seriously.. maybe it's "Cool" and the in thing to talk about how Gays are invading the world, but that is just pure ignorance...

Gay Agenda, Gays on TV, Gays shoved down my throat... and yet we can still get fired, denied services, housing, property etc just because we are GLBTQ+

posted on Aug, 18 2015 @ 12:22 AM
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Would you have considered the Dick Van Dyke show to pushing some kind of agenda also?

posted on Aug, 18 2015 @ 12:30 AM
Maybe it was who knows anymore, the odd couple maybe.

As told by Orsen Wells in this Vid called 'Future Shock'. We're apparently living it right now years later. The comments were interesting as they showed kids from 12- up in school.

posted on Aug, 18 2015 @ 03:50 AM

originally posted by: Exelcior
Just why is it so wrong to hate gays? There is clearly a natural repulsion towards them. How is it wrong to express that? It is possibly not even so much a matter of sexuality but a matter of style. Even if gays stopped being gay, but they still dressed up as such and sounded like it and be lame and annoying general, they would still be gay. It's no joy for the senses, it's like morbid obesity or something. We see it's not something we want to see. Abominations. Are we fattophobes then? I think it's some sort of natural quality control. We don't want the world to be infested with hideous monsters. Maybe they can't help it, maybe they have some condition, like obsessive compulsive eating disorder, but still we have a valid reason not to hire them or not to bake them a cake if we don't feel like it, don't we? (it's for their own good). How about gays? Is it that you HAVE to hire them because they are gay or they sue you for discrimination? And you have to bake them cake or you are out of business? (even though you don't have to bake for anyone if you don't feeli like it). Who knows. And you can't make a comment againts them without being labeled as homophobe? How did they get it to that? Most people are silently silenced and they can't say what they really think because they would be attacked for their views, while pro-gays are free to spread their agenda. That's messed up.

If they are constantly in your face about it and acting in annoying ways, they are just asking for trouble. I understand perfectly why some people feel it is they duty to go bash them up. The whole subject used to be a taboo and out of mind out of sight. Maybe it was better that way. Putting them in every f***ing TV show is not good for anyone. It's not building tolerance but exceeding it. And then the heterophobes come and try to annoy you even further for not being compliant. It seems like some sort of conspiracy.

I just don't like to see gays ruin TV. Even childrens cartoons are not safe. I'm not sure but didn't "Dispicable me 2" have f***ing YMCA song in it? Isn't that like the gay national anthem or something? Is that really suitable for children? Gays tend to magically ruin everything they are associated to. Like rainbows for instance used to be a nice natural phenomenon, now it's just gay.

They should probably tell the kids too that that stuff is gay so they don't embarrass themselves.

You do know the tag line on this site is " Deny Ignorance" don't you?

posted on Aug, 18 2015 @ 04:53 AM
For a man that does not want to come across as homophobic you basically streamed a load of homophobic wording as in the Will & Grace comment with the double negative of "I don't like it" followed by a un-needed "at all".

You might want to sit and reread what you wrote to see what you wanted to say and what you actually wrote.

Yes mass media has a agenda's but normally its a more directly political one rather than you thinking they are trying to brainwash you with gay TV. I watch TV, not a great deal but enough to form an opinion and I don't see a gay agenda, yes there are programmes with gay people in but no more than real life. The percentage devoted to gay TV is very low, probably lower than it should be to be honest as there are quite a few gay people out there man and woman, they are just as entitled to a bit of their lifestyle TV but to be honest I'd bet they are watching as much main stream stuff as you and not even giving it a thought.

I live life with the ideal that I want a person to treat me how I'd treat them, if they don't then I avoid them, if they do I treat them as friendly, I don't see colour or lifestyle, I see person.

posted on Aug, 18 2015 @ 11:11 AM
a reply to: mymojo

Dear lord!

I love it when them's what preach against being judgemental judge and condemn others in the name of god. Like god needs you to do his job for him, get over yourself.

Funny as hell.

Oops, said the 'H' word...please - don't convict and sentence me on behalf of your god, something tells me he doesn't like that as much as you've convinced yourself he does

posted on Aug, 18 2015 @ 11:56 AM
They are featuring more gays in the media because they are finally being allowed to exist openly in society. As they should be. Because being gay is normal and exists in every facet of the animal Kingdom. In a couple generations we'll all look back at this time like we look back on racial integration now. It's painful for some but time marches on.
edit on 8/18/15 by Malynn because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 18 2015 @ 01:29 PM

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
I have no personall issue with it (to each his own), but I take exception to every freaking show trying to shove it down everyone's throat as if every other person in society is gay. The facts are, homosexuality is in the minority of societal population. Does it exist? Yes. Does it upset me? No. Do I agree with it? No, but that's just my opinion (ONLY mine). Is it wrong? This is not for me to say. However, I take strong exception to increasingly more and more TV programs and the news trying to make this lifestyle appear as if it is a significant representative cross section of society. It isn't...and they are trying to force it to be that way.

Personally I take issue with all these hospital dramas aired on TV these days. Most people don't work in health care. Why are they trying to make it seem like a significant number of people are physicians or nurses? I don't have anything against them, I have a friend who is a doctor, but they are a minority of the population!
edit on 18-8-2015 by Subnatural because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 18 2015 @ 02:25 PM
a reply to: Subnatural

Isn't it funny how there are no complaints about Heterosexuality being shoved down anyone's throats... can you watch any sports on TV without someone pointing to the sky being 'Blessed' and thanking their lord and savior.. Religion down our throats?

How dare a Reality show cast a Gay person, how very dare they allow Gays to be seen on TV, how Dare a Show have a Gay Character, they don't exist in real life

can someone please explain the difference between Heterosexuality being shoved down our throats and Homosexuality?

posted on Aug, 18 2015 @ 04:11 PM
a reply to: Darth_Prime

I just want to point out that I'm offended by reality television in general. I think it's a medium that is populated predominately by fakes, heterosexual or otherwise.

I agree with you though, human didn't need that stuff to get along throughout history...we worked it out for ourselves. I reckon that as long as an adult is aware and has a choice to watch or not then fair enough...but it should be regulated as strictly as possible and kept from children up to a certain age.

In fact I think we're treading on very dangerous ground where porn of any type, be it straight or gay...and also quite disturbing and violent content is available to children in schools on various devices and most parents seem to involved with their own handheld devices to care much.

That's a very bad mix of anything to be available to young and impressionable people. We thrived without all of this, it can't be healthy. But that's another thread I suppose...carry on.

posted on Aug, 18 2015 @ 04:23 PM
a reply to: Darth_Prime

You haven't read my post back on page 5. To summarize: I don't want to see sex or making out by either group on my TV in my living room. Most of it has nothing to do with the story or if it does the point could have been made less graphically.

posted on Aug, 18 2015 @ 04:26 PM
a reply to: icewater

At what point is there Gay Sex on TV?
edit on 18-8-2015 by Darth_Prime because: (no reason given)

posted on Aug, 18 2015 @ 04:38 PM
I remember a rather smutty show on channel 4 about 15 or so years ago called eurotrash and it was basically an excuse to show porn of all types.

Naturally, as kids, we all would watch it then talk about it at school. It was aired late at night but easily accessible to us as we were privileged, spoilt...but not to the standards of today.

We had our own tv and such...accessing what kids can get their mitts on nowadays was most likely impossible. To me we're just progressing down a bad road where we're becoming more narcissistic and self involved. Everyone's got whacky hair, trendy clothes - they all dress like reality tv show stars because they believe that is actually reality.

I'm not religious, at all. But still, there's part of me that knows this isn't right. We're beasts of lust and pleasure, selfish, greedy...want what we want and all so self entitled. Ot's not even really about sexuality or how diverse it is, it's a small part of a bigger picture.

Kids can see what they want when they want and like us their curiosity will lead them down some dark paths, darker than any paths we stumbled on at such young and impressionable ages. People speak about role models...who gave a damn about the sexuality of any great hero in history? No one, it should be a non-issue on both side. We don't feel the need to have heterosexual pride day and if we did I can imagine the outcry it would cause.

If you genuinely believe your lifestyle is natural then why the need to validate it, just be who you are. It's not the kids that need educating,t hey adapt to their environment...that's why we're here now and are who we are. It's the adults that need educating...we care too much about what the other people are doing. We seem to want approval for who and what we are...all I see are people posting constant selfies and trying to prove to everyone else that they're so tolerant and loving, etc, etc.

All I see are double standards.

posted on Aug, 18 2015 @ 04:52 PM
a reply to: samerulesapply

You are confusing (most people do) what PRIDE is when it comes to Pride events, Parades etc. it's not having a 'Special Month' where we shove the GLBTQ+ down everyone's throats.

posted on Aug, 18 2015 @ 04:58 PM
a reply to: Darth_Prime

I never said or implied that gay pride events were any such thing.

My point is if it's natural (again, I'm neither claiming nor disputing that) then why celebrate it at all? If people don't want to be singled out or labelled why group and label yourself? What's all the fuss?

I'm not denying you your right to a pride event, have at it. But you'll always get haters, you can't complain at being labeled then group yourself into a category that, supposedly...shouldn't really exist...I'm just, really...confused. I'm sorry, and i mean that.

I'm leaving this thread now, no hard feelings I meant no harm or insult to anyone.

posted on Aug, 18 2015 @ 05:10 PM
a reply to: samerulesapply

The Pride parades were to remember Stonewall and the Equality Marches, and it expanded out from there. it started as political and it still has it's political edge now, but is more open to all aspects of the GLBTQ+ Culture and History.

Pride is celebrated because we are told we are immoral, we are mental defects we are "Wrong" and Unnatural and abominations, we are disappointments to our Family etc. so we our Pride to be who we are and survive the negativity, just like other people who have been oppressed do and should do the same.

Think of it this way, people assume you are straight from Birth, when you are born peoples first thought is not oh He/She is Gay or Bisexual... we have this thought of our Parents wanting Grandchildren and the "American Life" Married White Picket Fence Children etc. anything outside of that is "unnatural"

so we have to come out, we have to tell people that we are GLBTQ+ and this is who we are and no matter the negativity we are proud.

form being disowned by our parents, homeless, killed and attacked we are Ok and Proud to be who we are

does that make sense?

posted on Aug, 18 2015 @ 05:20 PM

originally posted by: Malynn
They are featuring more gays in the media because they are finally being allowed to exist openly in society. As they should be. Because being gay is normal and exists in every facet of the animal Kingdom. In a couple generations we'll all look back at this time like we look back on racial integration now. It's painful for some but time marches on.

You are wrong. Gay doesn't exist in the animal kingdom.
Intercourse in the animal kingdom exists for two reasons.... fertilization and dominance.

So pull out your thoroughly studied and peer backed reviews stating that some animal said they are gay and like gay sex because they are in love. Please do so, cause I would love to see the amazing study.

And please don't make it the story about the two male penguins who are best mates - they are not dominate enough to be able to mate with a female, therefore they are mates (best friends). They don't have sex with each other.

Nothing wrong with some gays on TV because it does offer some realism in some circumstances because there are gay people in real life.

new topics

top topics

<< 6  7  8    10  11 >>

log in