It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Ectoplasm8
originally posted by: iDope
When a 160+ page report by scientists go into every detail imaginable and cannot conclude what it is, noone on this thread will either.
Yeah, quite the unbiased clear-minded group of scientists. Investigated by a group that call themselves the Scientific Coalition of UFOlogy. Can't go wrong there.
The video is first given to Daina Chaviano who happens to be a field investigator for MUFON in Florida. She then contacts Morgan Beall who is the lead investigator of the MUFON chapter for Florida. Then Robert Powell was along to help author the paper and has been the director of research for MUFON since 2007. Hmmmm... is there a running theme here?
Every time you mention "scientists", inferring it's a group unbiased investigators, either lead or follow it with "many affiliated with MUFON." I think it's important for clarity.
originally posted by: Parthin96
Weird huh? Still, it wasn't all that fast. And it flew in almost a straight line, which THEIRS never do . My guess would be a terrestrial aircraft of some type. a reply to: fockewulf190
originally posted by: fleabit
Has anyone in this thread actually read the report?
I'm amazed that folks here can in watching a clip perhaps 2 times (some once.. some not even finishing it).. can come up to conclusive results on what the object actually was. 6 folks with plenty of scientific history spending 1000 man hours, debunked by 7 minutes of watching a video. Amazing!
originally posted by: Ectoplasm8
This is ridiculous. First off, the "object" isn't going underwater. Watch the sequence between 1:41 and 1:45 before it's even near the water. This is a screen shot from that sequence reading right to left:
In frames 1 and 2 the object is clearly visible. In frames 3, 4, 5 and 6 it goes behind a cloud. In frame 7 it's clearly visible again as it emerges from the cloud. You see the same thing between 1:49 and 1:57. IR can't see completely through dense cold clouds and will only give a small heat signature of the object, as it does in the video.
The only time it touches water is at 2:34 when after losing altitude, the bottom strikes a wave and it splits apart.
You're not alone gortex. As I said over a year ago with this video.... Ballooooooooons:
originally posted by: sprockets2000
This reminds me of the UFO they said could be "trash" in Denver. Trash HAHAHA
www.youtube.com...
They're all experts here, didn't ya know?
They work in tandem, you'll soon notice them.
originally posted by: gortex
Because anyone who doesn't buy the unexplained object narrative is a shill , that's a given here , right ?
originally posted by: gortex
I've read enough to understand that this is essentially a MUFON report , the authors of the report are not exactly dispassionate scientists.
You know, being skeptic to claims of extraterrestial craft or just unidentified flying/submerged objects is one thing, spending thousands of hours on a web site systematically coming up with explanations that always lead to the same conclusion is another.
At least they do have credentials. Do you?
Instead of attacking the credentials or reputation of those doing the research, how about attacking their research instead.
originally posted by: gortex
My government handlers won't allow me to release that information
I want proof just as bad as everyone else, but:
originally posted by: funbox
a reply to: gortex
my apologies Gortex , I couldn't hear your post from down here , it appears you've been driven way up high by a sustained gust of wind , that lasted for around 5 mins
waybelowBox