It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Breaking: ‘Top Secret’ emails found on Clinton Server

page: 8
79
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 11 2015 @ 08:47 PM
link   

originally posted by: shaneslaughta
a reply to: Sublimecraft

I think people would know it better as Bradly Manning, though that i am a female trapped in a mans body was a nice attempt at getting better accommodations.

Its just scary to think about all the sensitive data she was privy to and how she abused that right. She is just one that got caught. Think about how many hundreds of others may be misusing their clearances and or being outright stupid with technology.


Really?? I mean are you effing serious?? You come into the thread with an off topic remark just to call someone an it. Ok you thing go back to whatever rock you crawled out from. Real piece of work you are, "oh look at me I'm so clever cuz I can call someone an it, he he he."




posted on Aug, 11 2015 @ 08:48 PM
link   
I also read in an article that she was not the only user of the email server. It makes me wonder who why and what did they feel the need to converse about on a private email server with top secret documents.

My conspiracy alarm is really starting to sound now. lol



posted on Aug, 11 2015 @ 08:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: TrappedPrincess

originally posted by: shaneslaughta
a reply to: Sublimecraft

I think people would know it better as Bradly Manning, though that i am a female trapped in a mans body was a nice attempt at getting better accommodations.

Its just scary to think about all the sensitive data she was privy to and how she abused that right. She is just one that got caught. Think about how many hundreds of others may be misusing their clearances and or being outright stupid with technology.


Really?? I mean are you effing serious?? You come into the thread with an off topic remark just to call someone an it. Ok you thing go back to whatever rock you crawled out from. Real piece of work you are, "oh look at me I'm so clever cuz I can call someone an it, he he he."


First off i didn't come in here, i was here since page 1. Second, how about not jumping the gun and assuming i am being an asshole. Ever heard of a typo?

Golly gee wizz forgive me for being human. Whatever happend to a a friendly pm or a bump to alert the person?

Defensive much? Ill edit it just for you.



posted on Aug, 11 2015 @ 08:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: shaneslaughta
I also read in an article that she was not the only user of the email server. It makes me wonder who why and what did they feel the need to converse about on a private email server with top secret documents.

My conspiracy alarm is really starting to sound now. lol


And with good reason.



posted on Aug, 11 2015 @ 08:54 PM
link   

originally posted by: shaneslaughta

originally posted by: TrappedPrincess

originally posted by: shaneslaughta
a reply to: Sublimecraft

I think people would know it better as Bradly Manning, though that i am a female trapped in a mans body was a nice attempt at getting better accommodations.

Its just scary to think about all the sensitive data she was privy to and how she abused that right. She is just one that got caught. Think about how many hundreds of others may be misusing their clearances and or being outright stupid with technology.


Really?? I mean are you effing serious?? You come into the thread with an off topic remark just to call someone an it. Ok you thing go back to whatever rock you crawled out from. Real piece of work you are, "oh look at me I'm so clever cuz I can call someone an it, he he he."


First off i didn't come in here, i was here since page 1. Second, how about not jumping the gun and assuming i am being an asshole. Ever heard of a typo?

Golly gee wizz forgive me for being human. Whatever happend to a a friendly pm or a bump to alert the person?

Defensive much? Ill edit it just for you.


I'll give you that you were in the thread previously but there is no excuse to call anyone an it and yes I am defensive over that. Typo my arse, that I do not believe but if you edit it then I will accept that as an honest attempt at making amends.



posted on Aug, 11 2015 @ 09:00 PM
link   
a reply to: TrappedPrincess

It was really just a mistake of the fingers. The comment was not to poke fun at transgendered or even the confused. It was just pointing out that he/she didn't have a problem being in the service and being comfortable with him/her self until he/she got caught.



posted on Aug, 11 2015 @ 09:03 PM
link   
Bravo.
Now, my friends,...let's get back to the topic at hand.



posted on Aug, 11 2015 @ 09:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: shaneslaughta
a reply to: TrappedPrincess

It was really just a mistake of the fingers. The comment was not to poke fun at transgendered or even the confused. It was just pointing out that he/she didn't have a problem being in the service and being comfortable with him/her self until he/she got caught.


You changed it so I give you credit for and appreciate that but c'mon man typing out it as opposed to her is a bit hard to believe as a typo. Freudian slip I'd accept but anyway you seem to want to play nice, so shall I. My apologies for lashing out but when I am offended I immediately set out to offend the offender.



posted on Aug, 11 2015 @ 09:07 PM
link   
a reply to: IAMTAT

Here Here.

So who is she selling secrets to? Russia? Snowden is still there isn't he?

I jest. I really don't have a clue at this point what to think. Time will tell.



posted on Aug, 11 2015 @ 09:08 PM
link   
I'm excited, I hope its aliens! Please let it be aliens,...... (Insert pic of the crazy hair guy from ancient aliens)
Staying tuned to this thread my curiosity has been massaged.



posted on Aug, 11 2015 @ 09:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kapusta



Clinton deleted more e-mails than she turned over. And, the process by which she decided which e-mails were entirely personal -- and, therefore, could be deleted -- remains relatively opaque. We know that these are the four criteria Clinton's office used to decide which e-mails to turn over: 1. Any e-mail sent to or received from an address including ".gov" was included. 2. The e-mail set was searched for the first and last name of 100 State Department employees and government officials. Any matches were reviewed. 3. All of the other e-mails were reviewed to evaluate the sender and recipient, in case of typos. 4. All of the e-mails were searched for specific terms, including "Libya" and "Benghazi." But, we don't know a) who led this process b) how many people were involved in it c) whether Clinton herself was involved in it or d) whether any one person actually read all of the e-mails. What we do know is that people on Clinton's payroll were in charge of deciding which e-mails to turn over to the State Department and which to permanently delete. And, let me emphasize again, that we are talking about 31,380 e-mails that will never, ever be seen again

Makes you wonder how good NSA really is if they cannot access "all" her emails if apparently every aspect of our lives are spied upon.
It's a dog and pony show for me......2016 writing is on the wall POTUS Billary.



posted on Aug, 11 2015 @ 09:13 PM
link   

originally posted by: Siris
I'm excited, I hope its aliens! Please let it be aliens,...... (Insert pic of the crazy hair guy from ancient aliens)
Staying tuned to this thread my curiosity has been massaged.


Let me help you.





I can only hope its Aliens.



posted on Aug, 11 2015 @ 09:14 PM
link   
a reply to: southbeach

They can.

And they did.

And they have 'em all.

Who do you think alerted the whole mess in the first place.




posted on Aug, 11 2015 @ 09:15 PM
link   
I didn't hear a peep about this on NBC nightly news tonight.

Edit: I'll believe all this when I see an indictment.
edit on 11-8-2015 by MystikMushroom because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 11 2015 @ 09:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: MystikMushroom
I didn't hear a peep about this on NBC nightly news tonight.


Hmmm.

I wonder why?



I could give it one good guess, but this topic isn't in the mud pit.




posted on Aug, 11 2015 @ 09:18 PM
link   

originally posted by: MystikMushroom
I didn't hear a peep about this on NBC nightly news tonight.

huh. That's surprising. I wonder why they wouldn't want to report on this subject.



posted on Aug, 11 2015 @ 09:18 PM
link   
Lol thank you for indulging me, this is the very picture in question.



posted on Aug, 11 2015 @ 09:20 PM
link   

originally posted by: MystikMushroom
I didn't hear a peep about this on NBC nightly news tonight.

Edit: I'll believe all this when I see an indictment.


I wonder if they'd even report a Hillary indictment.



posted on Aug, 11 2015 @ 09:24 PM
link   
The more i think about it the more i can see a wide range of implications depending on who else in involved and what the actual data is.

This could be a lot bigger than what it seems.



posted on Aug, 11 2015 @ 09:25 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

Exactly.
And that's my point.
Yet if i or you came up on the all seeing eyes radar we would be in Jail for far less.



new topics

top topics



 
79
<< 5  6  7    9  10  11 >>

log in

join