It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
We've written several times about what a huge, sprawling company Google is and how many projects the company has going at any given time. Now-former CEO Larry Page apparently agrees: as part of a big shake-up, Page announced today that he is now the CEO of "Alphabet," a brand-new company of which Google is just one part. Page will be CEO of Alphabet, and fellow Google co-founder Sergey Brin will be helping him run Alphabet in some capacity. Sundar Pichai is now the CEO of the subsidiary known as Google.
Page describes the Google part of Alphabet as a "slimmed-down" company that still encompasses most of the things we think of as Google products—things like Google Now, Google Photos, and Google Maps are mentioned by name. Both Chrome and Android will continue under the Google banner. YouTube, which already operates as its own subsidiary under CEO Susan Wojcicki, will also remain under Google.
originally posted by: kal1ch
a reply to: reldra
At least read the article before being unconvinced by it. The author shares a lot of details regarding the people who run Google. It's an interesting read, regardless if you know the author or not.
originally posted by: Martin75
a reply to: reldra
Google doesn't fight the government. They happily and willingly hand over everything.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: kal1ch
a reply to: reldra
At least read the article before being unconvinced by it. The author shares a lot of details regarding the people who run Google. It's an interesting read, regardless if you know the author or not.
Read. Many points already brought up. Poor sourcing. Not new.
I am NOT a Google fan. I got rid of Chrome. I use other search engines. But not convinced of anything by what I have read here.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: Martin75
a reply to: reldra
Google doesn't fight the government. They happily and willingly hand over everything.
Not correct. 5 minutes of research would show otherwise. Here is a recent one. source You can find about a thousand like that. Research is your friend.
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: Martin75
I don't think you quite understand how the law works...
originally posted by: Chrisfishenstein
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: kal1ch
a reply to: reldra
At least read the article before being unconvinced by it. The author shares a lot of details regarding the people who run Google. It's an interesting read, regardless if you know the author or not.
Read. Many points already brought up. Poor sourcing. Not new.
I am NOT a Google fan. I got rid of Chrome. I use other search engines. But not convinced of anything by what I have read here.
Oh you don't use Google....Then you are off the lists and nobody is watching your computer usage.....(eyes rolling)....Who gives an eff what you use? They are all the same and all linked to all government agencies, FYI this site is about the biggest red flag to all the "alphabet agencies" you are talking about....
originally posted by: kal1ch
a reply to: reldra
This thread is about Google's potential link to the CIA and other Alphabet Agencies concerned with surveillance of any type. The response is on topic.
If you have definitive proof that Google is not tied to Alphabet Agencies in any way, I urge you to convince me. Absence of proof is not proof of absence.
originally posted by: kal1ch
a reply to: reldra
Since I am the one who created the topic, give me the benefit of being able to define its purpose. I created it specifically to discuss Google's ties with CIA and the interesting "Alphabet" name choice.
Now please, if you have nothing relevant to contribute, stop trying to divert the discussion.
originally posted by: reldra
originally posted by: kal1ch
a reply to: reldra
Since I am the one who created the topic, give me the benefit of being able to define its purpose. I created it specifically to discuss Google's ties with CIA and the interesting "Alphabet" name choice.
Now please, if you have nothing relevant to contribute, stop trying to divert the discussion.
I didn't divert anything. What I said was pretty close to what you said.