a reply to: samkent
They can't offer proof, because there is none for either.
This has been debunked over and over again.
For Thermite/Thermate (they like to interchange the two) -
The one man who claimed to have found "evidence" actually didn't, his paper was trashed by every scientist in the field and although it was published
on a pretty rubbish "science" website he claimed it was "peer reviewed", the person who owns that website then removed it and openly stated that it
The material he claimed was evidence of Thermite was actually nothing more than rust and pain chips, the same as you would find in billions of samples
taken from all kinds of places around the world. When asked to supply the samples he used, he refused to.
The claim that evidence of Thermite being used in the buildings with "molten steel" flowing out is also false. There were tonnes upon tonnes of
Aluminium used in the construction of both the plane and the building, which is orange when molten at the temperatures proven to have been in
existence in that building, and anyone who tells you it doesn't glow orange is a flat out liar.
The supposed "glow" seen from beneath the rubble which "truthers" claim is evidence of Thermite having molten the steel was actually nothing more than
the reflection of the camera mans flashlight when looking through that gap.
All tests after the fact have consistently shown that to melt steel to the degree they would have needed would have taken tonnes of Thermite, and
there was frankly not enough physical space in those areas for such an amount to have been applied.
The image of cut beams they claim was evidence of Thermite melting the columns at an angle was a blatant fabrication, the image was taken AFTER the
rescue effort was underway and was done by crews removing the debris.
As for Explosives, again there is absolutely no evidence for this.
They would need tonnes of explosives to be able to take out those columns, and I'm not talking lbs of it, I am literally talking TONNES of it. These
people seem to imagine all it would take is a Hollywood style chunk of Plastic Explosive on a column, but that would not do it.
You would also need so much of the stuff it would be impossible to rig a building like those towers with enough to take them down.
All of the above is the reason the "truthers" then start to invent their own magical mystery formula for brand new explosives the world has never
seen. When these people finally have their beliefs debunked through science, they start to become increasingly irrational in their weaving of the
fairytale to rebuild their belief.
It's like the fanatical religious person ending up saying "the Lord works in mysterious ways" because they no longer have an argument to debate you
I can guarantee that most of the "truthers" answering to this thread will completely ignore the fact that whatever they claim is evidence has been
debunked plenty of times. They refuse to accept that their conspiracy is not real and no matter how much you try to show them the real evidence and
the actual reality of that day they will utterly reject it all - and ironically while claiming YOU are narrow minded and refuse to consider an
The fact is, unless they can provide evidence for what they claim (and a YouTube video IS NOT evidence) then they should be repeatedly laughed out of