posted on Dec, 29 2004 @ 08:57 PM
Here's my theory I posted on a different thread...
From what I've seen, Gravity is more of an effect as opposed to some actual thing. Like a very complicated form of centripetal motion or centrifugal
motion. Where you have to think of a huge wash of electrons desperately trying to reduce their orbits over their super heated parent atoms. Heat
something it expands, cool something it contracts. So, as the core is super heated an pressurized and then rapidly spun, the electrons are spun
outward and away, but they must still maintain some sort of orbit no matter how far out they are. Example, heat a magnet and the field disappears or
did it? The field may be weaker just simply because the force was sent further out over a larger area and can no longer be detected. Cool it off, and
presto, it returns. Now, really cool it down, and the force falls in on itself and will do wierd things like superconducting.
I say all this, after observing a strange effect from some university science experiment on TV. They had a huge magnet at some lab. A large round one
on its side, probably about 6-7 feet in diameter. With a 3 inch hole in its center. Not sure what their experiment was supposed to be, but one of the
students put an object in that hole while the magnet was on and it went into a free fall. The object floated in the center. They put a spider and frog
in there, and both became weightless while in the center of this giant magnet. Neither was harmed. I guess they blew off their main experiment to
explain this new effect. Nothing was super cooled, so it wasn't like those levitation, anti-gravity experiments you see.
I believe the magnet was powerful enough to cancel the effect of gravity or electron wash within that hole and cause a free fall. Its field created a
bubble strong enough for a tiny area to be free of gravity, or those particles responsible for it which are orbiting in and out of the core, like a
vacuum tube is sealed from the atmosphere.
Now when applied to another thread concerning frame dragging it would easily explain what's going on. I don't buy the time/space warping idea
proposed by most scientist. Its probably more mundane than that, which most things in nature tend to be. The spacecraft in the frame dragging
experiment are being dragged along in the wash of particles zooming in and out of the core creating both the magnetic field and gravity effect. Like
a leaf in a gentle stream, the satellites are being dragged along by a sheer mass of particles. Its not much, but apparently measurable. The very
air is made up of large atoms dense enough to allow airflight.
Now when comparing planetary gravity fields like mars, earth and venus which are relatively similar in size, it probably boils down to what heavy
elements are in their respective cores and then the respective pressures on the exterior of that core bearing down on it. Venus has the sheer weight
of its atmosphere which would probably be the equivalent to converting earth's oceans to steam. Earth has the pressure of both atmosphere and oceans
exerting pressure on the mantle. While mars has no appreciable atmosphere or water for that matter to exert pressure on its mantle to help rev up its
It's just my opinion, but it makes the most sense. Its probably the most direct explanation of the effect. I watch a show on quantum physics the
other day, and they still have no solid explanation for gravity, I couldn't believe it.