It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

#AllLivesMatter

page: 6
20
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 9 2015 @ 12:49 PM
link   
a reply to: Mugly

Yes that is correct. Police are the servants not the civilians.




posted on Aug, 9 2015 @ 12:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: JalapenoPepper

You are ignorant of facts. Walking down he street is not a valid reason for being stopped.


it is if you fit the profile of a crime that just happened.

do you not understand that?



posted on Aug, 9 2015 @ 12:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Mugly

Yes that is correct. Police are the servants not the civilians.


can you show me some proof please?
i dont usually ask for it but i just dont believe you.

pretty sure you have to answer/follow LAWFUL orders.



posted on Aug, 9 2015 @ 12:51 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: JalapenoPepper

You are ignorant of facts. Walking down he street is not a valid reason for being stopped.


It is if cars are having to go around you because of the chip on your shoulder.



posted on Aug, 9 2015 @ 12:52 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: JalapenoPepper

You are ignorant of facts. Walking down he street is not a valid reason for being stopped.


Name one case of someone stopped for walking down the street? While listening to my scanner, it is always someone who matches a description, from someone who CALLED. Go online and listen to live police scanners... You will understand then, that the police are not targeting ANYONE. they go to where the calls/dispatch send them. Stop the lie!



Jalapeno!
edit on 9-8-2015 by JalapenoPepper because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 9 2015 @ 12:52 PM
link   
a reply to: Mugly

Stop and Frisk policies don't require a crime to have been committed to stop someone. Do you not understand that? That's a direct violation of the Constitution and white fear/hate allows that violation. Do you not understand that?



posted on Aug, 9 2015 @ 12:54 PM
link   
a reply to: Mugly

Lawful being the key word in Lawful Order.



posted on Aug, 9 2015 @ 12:55 PM
link   



posted on Aug, 9 2015 @ 12:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Mugly

Lawful being the key word in Lawful Order.


Go listen online to a live police scanner. Once your done, you will be born again.


Jalapeno!



posted on Aug, 9 2015 @ 12:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Mugly

Stop and Frisk policies don't require a crime to have been committed to stop someone. Do you not understand that? That's a direct violation of the Constitution and white fear/hate allows that violation. Do you not understand that?


i dont understand that. i dont know everything the constitution says.
i didnt know it said anything about stop and frisk policies.

how did we go from being stopped and asked questions to being stopped and patted down anyway?

im still on the question part



posted on Aug, 9 2015 @ 12:57 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: JalapenoPepper

Search results from google



You cannot claim that which you do not know.


Jalapeno!



posted on Aug, 9 2015 @ 12:58 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bone75
From the #Black Lives Matter/About page...

#BlackLivesMatter was created in 2012 after Trayvon Martin’s murderer, George Zimmerman, was acquitted for his crime

George Zimmerman didn't murder anyone, he shot his attacker in self-defense. This movement is BS.



Whats funny is Zimmerman isnt white but was adopted.



posted on Aug, 9 2015 @ 01:00 PM
link   
a reply to: Mugly

4th Amendment says no unreasonable seizures or searches...


I think, Rudy Giuliani could answer your question.
edit on 9-8-2015 by CharlieSpeirs because: (no reason given)

edit on 9-8-2015 by CharlieSpeirs because: (no reason given)

edit on 9-8-2015 by CharlieSpeirs because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 9 2015 @ 01:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: JalapenoPepper

Search results from google


from terry vs ohio. it was on the page you linked


Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court which held that the Fourth Amendment prohibition on unreasonable searches and seizures is not violated when a police officer stops a suspect on the street and frisks him or her without probable cause to arrest, if the police officer has a reasonable suspicion that the person has committed, is committing, or is about to commit a crime and has a reasonable belief that the person "may be armed and presently dangerous.


so, yeah



posted on Aug, 9 2015 @ 01:00 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: JalapenoPepper

Search results from google



go to google or wherever, and type in live online police scanners... If you find any evidence that they did anything wrong, post back... See ya in the next life. They are sent to their calls by callers.. Nothing racist. See for yourself.


Jalapeno!
edit on 9-8-2015 by JalapenoPepper because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 9 2015 @ 01:05 PM
link   
a reply to: Mugly

Are you American? If so, read the US Constitution please. Seriously.



Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


Probable cause can only mean that a crime has been committed in which the police have been called and you match the description given by a witness, a crime has been committed and the police witnessed it themselves, a crime has been committed and you are the only person around.


The Stop-question-and-frisk program, or stop-and-frisk, in New York City, is a practice of the New York City Police Department in which police officers stop and question a pedestrian, then frisk them for weapons and other contraband; this is what is known in other places as the Terry stop. The rules for stop, question and frisk are found in the state's Criminal Procedure Law (the criminal procedure law) section 140.50, and are based on the decision of the United States Supreme Court in the case of Terry v. Ohio.[1][2] About 684,000 people were stopped in 2011.[1][3][4] The vast majority of these people were African-American or Latino.[1][3][4] Some judges have found that these stops are not based on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.[5]


wikipedia

ETA: Note: Stop and Frisk exists outside of NYC as well.

edit on 8/9/2015 by Kali74 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 9 2015 @ 01:07 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Mugly

Are you American? If so, read the US Constitution please. Seriously.



Amendment IV

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


Probable cause can only mean that a crime has been committed in which the police have been called and you match the description given by a witness, a crime has been committed and the police witnessed it themselves, a crime has been committed and you are the only person around.


The Stop-question-and-frisk program, or stop-and-frisk, in New York City, is a practice of the New York City Police Department in which police officers stop and question a pedestrian, then frisk them for weapons and other contraband; this is what is known in other places as the Terry stop. The rules for stop, question and frisk are found in the state's Criminal Procedure Law (the criminal procedure law) section 140.50, and are based on the decision of the United States Supreme Court in the case of Terry v. Ohio.[1][2] About 684,000 people were stopped in 2011.[1][3][4] The vast majority of these people were African-American or Latino.[1][3][4] Some judges have found that these stops are not based on reasonable suspicion of criminal activity.[5]


wikipedia

ETA: Note: Stop and Frisk exists outside of NYC as well.



If you walk around a national park and see a bear, are you not going to be cautious? Because of the danger they pose?


Jalapeno!



posted on Aug, 9 2015 @ 01:08 PM
link   
a reply to: JalapenoPepper

A bear is a wild animal, a person... a black person is not a wild animal.



posted on Aug, 9 2015 @ 01:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: JalapenoPepper

A bear is a wild animal, a person... a black person is not a wild animal.




Do civilized people do what they do when they are mad?



Jalapeno!



posted on Aug, 9 2015 @ 01:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: JalapenoPepper

Facts don't hurt anyone...
And even if they did...

Your post did not involve any!


This blog post is jam packed with facts and sources for your reading pleasure. Just thought you might appreciate it... or not.

Why are the Whitest States so Peaceful?

Funny how the most segregated states are all blue.




top topics



 
20
<< 3  4  5    7  8  9 >>

log in

join