It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

the new chuck taylor all star II cost $75

page: 1
2

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 4 2015 @ 08:55 PM
link   
i dont think so

im a fan of the chucks but they have been over priced for years.
those are $25 shoes all day long

www.converse.com...

the $75 gets you
'premium' canvas
lunarlon sock liner
micro suede lining
padded non slip tongue

new



old



nope




posted on Aug, 4 2015 @ 08:59 PM
link   
Don't hate. $75 is CHEAP for a pair of shoes these days. Will look great next to my Jordan's.



posted on Aug, 4 2015 @ 09:01 PM
link   
a reply to: Mugly

Sigh...

In seventh grade I actually got into a massive amount of trouble ( at school and home ) because I got into a fight with a kid who was making fun of my Chuck's - because they were not Nike's. This was in the late 70's and anyone not in Nike's and an Izod shirt was seen as beneath contempt.

I was proud of my Chucks... and now.... this.



posted on Aug, 4 2015 @ 09:03 PM
link   
I'd buy those, they look alot better than the old ones. I wonder if they come in different colors.



posted on Aug, 4 2015 @ 09:06 PM
link   
a reply to: RealTruthSeeker

i posted a link
you should check it out

abe, $75 is not cheap for shoes in my book. i flip out if i have to pay more than about 30 bucks.

heff, i remember getting into scuffles for the same #.
i thought chucks were cool then and still do.
theyre not worth no damn 75 bucks thats for sure.

when i was in school, if you were not wearing nike, reebok, or fila, you were persona non grata

edit
black, red, white, blue
if they had the all black i might go up to $28
edit on 4-8-2015 by Mugly because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 4 2015 @ 09:17 PM
link   
I have always thought Converse shoes were FUGLY as hell. I didn't get in fights about it, I just never wore them.

I'll stick to my nice looking $130 Nike Air Max.



posted on Aug, 4 2015 @ 09:19 PM
link   

originally posted by: Bovah2
I have always thought Converse shoes were FUGLY as hell. I didn't get in fights about it, I just never wore them.

I'll stick to my nice looking $130 Nike Air Max.


bwuahahahahahahahaha

those are ugly as balls


edit on 4-8-2015 by Mugly because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 4 2015 @ 09:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Mugly

originally posted by: Bovah2
I have always thought Converse shoes were FUGLY as hell. I didn't get in fights about it, I just never wore them.

I'll stick to my nice looking $130 Nike Air Max.


bwuahahahahahahahaha

those are ugly as balls



Ew those are ugly!

Good thing mine aren't some weird flamboyant colors like that.

Mine are even designed differently. Mine actually look very nice. Better than any Converse i've ever seen. But that's just my opinion, and the tons of people that compliment me on my shoes when I'm out and about.

edit on 4-8-2015 by Bovah2 because: (no reason given)

edit on 4-8-2015 by Bovah2 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 4 2015 @ 10:56 PM
link   

originally posted by: Mugly

originally posted by: Bovah2
I have always thought Converse shoes were FUGLY as hell. I didn't get in fights about it, I just never wore them.

I'll stick to my nice looking $130 Nike Air Max.


bwuahahahahahahahaha

those are ugly as balls



Good god with all that mesh I've got to wonder if those are aqua shoes.
$130 for shoes like that made in China for under $10 including labor?
I work hard for my money, so I'll have to say no thanks I'll pass on those.



posted on Aug, 5 2015 @ 01:01 AM
link   
Those new low tops are clean. I just might have to get me a pair. $75 is a high start but they will go down in the stores as usual. But for now I'm willing to dish out 75 with some fat laces. Glad I saw this thread thank you




top topics



 
2

log in

join